(a)
Units of food, consumer would consume to maximizing utility is to be calculated.
Explanation of Solution
The consumer purchases food (F) and other goods (Y). The per unit price of F and Y is equal to $2 and $1 respectively. And the income of the consumer is equal to $12. The utility function of the consumer is given as follows-
And the budget constraint of the consumer can be calculated as follows-
The rate at which consumer is willing to sacrifice some units good F to get an additional unit of good Y is known as marginal rate of substitution (MRS). It measures the slope of the indifference curve. The ratio of price of good F to price of good Y measures slope of the budget constraint.
At the optimum level of consumption, slope of the indifference curve is equal to the slope of the budget constraint. Mathematically, it can be expressed as follows,
Plug the values of prices and marginal utilities in (2).
Plug (3) in (1).
Plug value of F equal to 3 in (3).
Thus, optimal level of food and other goods is equal to 3 units and 6 units respectively. This implies that the consumer will consume 3 units of food at the maximum utility level.
(b)
To calculate cash subsidy and present optimal consumption basket on an optimal choice diagram after cash subsidy.
Explanation of Solution
The cash subsidy provided by government should be enough so that her income increases as much that she can now consume 8 units of F.
Due to cash subsidy, the budget line changes as follows:
Therefore, the government should provide cash subsidy of $20 to the consumer so that he can consume 8 units of F. Plug F equal to 8 in (3) to calculate optimal unit of Y.
Thus, optimal consumption basket after cash subsidy includes 8 units of F and 16 units of Y.
Graphically, the point at which budget line is tangent to indifference curve gives the optimal level of consumption.
The figure (1) below plots the budget constraint along with the indifference curves of the consumer.
At point A (8,16), budget constraint is tangent to indifference curve showing optimal consumption basket.
(c)
Analysis of the effect of food stamp vouchers on consumption pattern and present optimal consumption basket on an optimal choice diagram after provision of food stamp scheme.
Explanation of Solution
Food stamp scheme:
It is a scheme under which government provides vouchers that can only be used to buy a good and cannot be used for meeting other desires.These vouchers are generally provided to ensure food safety of low-income or poor people.
As an alternative to the cash subsidy in part (b), the government is also considering giving consumers food stamps, that is, vouchers with a cash value that can only be redeemed to purchase food.
If the government is giving her a voucher of $16 to purchase food, she has $16 voucher and $12 as previous income to purchase good.
Now, she will consume 8 units of food with $16 voucher and 12 units of other goods with her income of $12. So, her new optimal consumption bundle is (8, 12).
The figure (2) below shows the optimal consumption basket after provision of food stamp scheme.
At point B (8,12), budget constraint is tangent to indifference curve showing optimal consumption basket.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK MICROECONOMICS
- Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, also known as BRICS, are emerging countries poised to be dominant economic players in the 21st century. What are some of the political, legal and economic conditions that help or hinder economic expansion for these countries?arrow_forwardExplain what is Microeconomics? Why is it important for all of us to understand what are the drivers in microeconomics?arrow_forwardThe production function for a product is given by Q =100KL.if the price of capital is 120 dollars per day and the price of labor 30 dollars per day what is the minimum cost of producing 1000 units of output ?arrow_forward
- خصائص TVAarrow_forwardplease show complete solution, step by step, thanksarrow_forwardTo determine the benefits of extending hours of operation for a food truck business, the couple should calculate additional revenue, break-even analysis, market demand, and raise prices. They should analyze competitors' prices and customer sensitivity to price changes, determine price elasticity, and test the strategy by implementing a slight price increase and monitoring sales closely. If costs exceed revenues, the couple should analyze their financials, evaluate their business model, explore new revenue streams, and consider long-term viability. They should analyze their financial statements to identify high costs and areas for reduction, evaluate their business model based on market demand, and explore new revenue streams like catering, special events, or partnerships with local businesses. Long-term viability is a key consideration, as if the business still operates at a loss after making adjustments, it may be necessary to consider shutting down. Staying in business should be…arrow_forward
- Respond to following post. You can charge higher prices if the parents think these are valuable by providing different services such as extended hours, healthy lunches, and smaller staff-to-child ratios. But pushing for prices much higher won’t make sense unless parents think the added value is worth the price hike. You should research your local parents to find out what they want. If you want your business to be profitable, then focus on your strengths, do great work and have a reputation. Promote your special products and keep your prices low. If you want to see if you’re making money, keep a log of all your profits and losses. You’re making money if you’re earning more than you’re losing. A break-even analysis can help you figure out how many customers you need to eat and start making money. Keep an eye on your budget so you don’t get off track.arrow_forwardIf you are willing to pay up to $8 for your first cup of coffee the blank of your first cup of coffee is $8arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- (Figure: Good Y and Good X) Suppose the budget constraint shifted from constraint 2 to constraint 1. What could have caused this change? Quantity of good Y 18 16 14 Budget constraint 2 12- 10 8 Budget constraint 1 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Quantity of good X an increase in income and an decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Y a decrease in income an decrease in the price of good X and no change in the price of Y a decrease in income and an increase in the price of good X relative to that of good Y an increase in income a decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Yarrow_forwardSuppose you have the three scenarios proposed below. Using the language of the Levy and Meltzer paper, Scenario(s). Scenario(s) _ can best be described as a randomized experiment. can best be described as an observational study, and Scenario A: Researchers randomly assign some individuals to a high-intensity workout program and others to a low-intensity program. They then track the participants to see how their cardiovascular health changes over time. Scenario B: Researchers randomly assign individuals to receive varying levels of nutrition education. They track participants and see how eating habits changed. Scenario C: Researchers have data on individuals' workout habits and their cardiovascular health. They use this data to describe the relationship between workout intensity and cardiovascular health. A; B and C A; B and C × A and B; C C; A and B B and C; Aarrow_forwardSuppose you observe that when the price of a particular vitamin supplement_ by 3%, the quantity purchased increased by 0.9%. This implies that this vitamin supplement is price in demand and that the price elasticity of demand is equal to _ ☑ rises; inelastic; 0.3 O O rises; inelastic; 0.9 falls; inelastic; 0.3 rises; elastic; 3 falls; inelastic; 0.9arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning