
(a)
Interpretation:The reason why the statement cannot be agreed upon with.
Concept Introduction:Organizations often go into automating production processes. This is done with a view in bringing down labor costs involved. However, the process is much complicated as well as expensive. It is very seldom that organizations realize that the cost savings from labor cannot be off-set with costs involved in automating.
(b)
Interpretation:The reason why the statement cannot be agreed upon with.
Concept Introduction:
Having robots run the production lines could be seen in many manufacturing organizations of the day. They are indeed helpful in enhancing the productivity. Nevertheless, it must be understood that organizations cannot solely rely on them.
(c)
Interpretation:The reason why the statement cannot be agreed upon with.
Concept Introduction:
Within the current context, it could be seen that many organizations move into computer integrated manufacturing. In doing so, it must be ensured that all functional units of the firm work towards the same objective with having equipment, mechanisms and processes that unify them into the above. Having individual agendas and mechanisms within various departments would lead the organization into chaos, incurring an enormous cost that would be irreversible.
(d)
Interpretation:The reason why the statement cannot be agreed upon with.
Concept Introduction:
Computer Aided Designing and Computer Aided Manufacturing are commonly heard terms within the day. They assist designers and engineers in doing their work much easier. However, in order to reap the maximum benefits from them, the personnel using them must be informed of what they could do as well as how they differ from doing the same manually. Without having a clear idea of the two settings, going into CAD and CAM blindly could mislead an organization.

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Chapter 4 Solutions
OM6 ONLINE-LMS INTEGRATED ACCESS
- Provide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forwardWomen who ask for what they want in negotiation are less well-liked than women who do not self-advocate. However, nonassertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash and are regarded as less competent because their behavior is regarded to be _____ and _____. A. high-negative feminine; low-positive masculine B. high-positive feminine; high-positive masculine C. high-negative masculine; low-negative feminine D. low-positive masculine; low-positive femininearrow_forward
- There are five most recognized personality traits that can reliably be measured and predict negotiator behavior in a number of different situations. All of the following are one of those "Big 5" personality traits except _____. A. conscientiousness B. introversion C. agreeableness D. openness to experiencearrow_forwardWith regard to reputation in negotiation, negotiators who use adversarial, stubborn, and ethically questionable behavior often have the effect of _____. A. improving their business relationships B. decreasing their effectiveness as a negotiator C. improving their business relationships D. decreasing their group statusarrow_forwardWhen it comes to assertiveness, there is only a modest link between negotiators' self-views and how the counterparty sees them. Many negotiators come away from a negotiation thinking they came on too strong with the counterparty. The _____ refers to the fact that negotiators believe they are coming on too strong with the counterparty, but they actually are not. A. Collective trap illusion B. Attribution error C. Aggressive anchoring bias D. Line-crossing illusionarrow_forward
- As you think about the issue of using chatbots in contract negotiations, consider whether other facets and concepts of negotiations that we have discussed and whether they would be adequately addressed.arrow_forwardWhile I am not a fan of AI as of yet, I do understand the endless possibilities. Based on the research, it is clear that AI has great potential for negotiation (Yang, 2025). Herold et al. (2025) suggested that AI can flag potential risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to address them and mitigate potential problems proactively. AI can draft new contract templates by examining industry standards and past contracts, and AI technology can help lawyers spot errors and inconsistencies in contract drafts. In relation to risk management, AI can flag possible risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to proactively address them and lessen potential problems, which can speed up the negotiation process, making the negotiation efficient because AI can industrialize tasks like document review, redlining, and finding potential issues, significantly reducing negotiation time. Lastly, AI can analyze vast amounts of data and identify errors, inconsistencies, and irregularities in…arrow_forwardWhat is a main thought on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward
- What are some people thoughts on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: a. Risk Management Plan Focus on specific, actionable steps for each risk and mitigation strategy.Provide detailed timelines for procurement, stakeholder engagement, and risk monitoring.Avoid over-simplifying and add more technical details in areas like quality assurance and financial control measures. Add a risk prioritization method and mention how risks will be monitored and reviewed throughout the project lifecycle. Overall, it is well organized andc overs key risks.arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: Human Resource Management Plan Provide more concrete timelines and actionable steps for human resource management.Include more detailed risk management strategies and link them more explicitly to the overall project plan.Expand on how training and development will be evaluated and tracked.Also, the overall length is good, but some sections could be condensed by eliminating repetition (e.g., you discuss stakeholder communication and engagement in two sections without adding new information).Try not to repeat the same risk management ideas (e.g., resource sharing and stakeholder concerns) in multiple sections without adding value.arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Contemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage LearningPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing


