Consider the following debate between two students regarding the energy given off by the Sun. Student 1: I think that the Sun gives off most of its energy at ultraviolet wavelengths because ultraviolet light is more intense than visible light and you always hear about ultraviolet light causing sunburns. Student 2: Even though UV photons are more energetic than visible photons, the Sun simply gives off fewer ultraviolet photons and gives off way more visible and infrared photons. So I think that these longer wavelength photons account for most of the energy coming from the Sun. Do you agree or disagree with either or both of these students? Explain your reasoning.
Consider the following debate between two students regarding the energy given off by the Sun. Student 1: I think that the Sun gives off most of its energy at ultraviolet wavelengths because ultraviolet light is more intense than visible light and you always hear about ultraviolet light causing sunburns. Student 2: Even though UV photons are more energetic than visible photons, the Sun simply gives off fewer ultraviolet photons and gives off way more visible and infrared photons. So I think that these longer wavelength photons account for most of the energy coming from the Sun. Do you agree or disagree with either or both of these students? Explain your reasoning.
Consider the following debate between two students regarding the energy given off by the Sun. Student 1: I think that the Sun gives off most of its energy at ultraviolet wavelengths because ultraviolet light is more intense than visible light and you always hear about ultraviolet light causing sunburns. Student 2: Even though UV photons are more energetic than visible photons, the Sun simply gives off fewer ultraviolet photons and gives off way more visible and infrared photons. So I think that these longer wavelength photons account for most of the energy coming from the Sun. Do you agree or disagree with either or both of these students? Explain your reasoning.
Solar scientists want to measure the temperature inside the sun by sending in probes. Imagine that temperature increases by 1 million◦C for every 10,000 km below the surface. A probe that can handle a temperature of x million degrees costs x³ million dollars. a. How much would it cost to measure the temperature 10,000 km down? b. How much would it cost to measure the temperature 100,000 km down? c. How much would it cost to measure the temperature 200,000 km down?
Hi, I just need help with Part 2 of 4 please. The answer I submitted of 4.592 × 1010 was not correct even in real number form and scientific e notation form.
Which of the following is least reasonable regarding the "water hole"?
Group of answer choices
It consists of frequencies which are greater than the frequencies of atmospheric emissions.
It relates to the natural frequencies of vibration of hydroxyl (OH) and hydrogen (H), respectively.
It occurs in that part of the electromagnetic spectrum where the galactic "noise" from stars and interstellar clouds is minimized.
It is considered the "electromagnetic oasis" for interstellar communication.
It corresponds to wavelengths in the 18-21 cm range.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.