The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 2BS
Summary Introduction
Case Summary: New York City enacted an ordinance to prevent crime, preserve the quality of urban life and maintaining property value to regularize the locations of the adult entertainment establishments. The ordinance didn’t apply to male, topless entertainment but only to females. AB owned a CC, a cabaret which featured female topless dancers. AB and an anonymous dancer filed a case against city to declare ordinance as unconstitutional.
To Explain: The standards that apply to the court for consideration of the ordinance.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…
Argue that piercing the corporate veil is a moral rule as well as a legal rule.
In January 2016 Ben Sisko bought a “Quark's Burgers” franchise in Montana. Quark's Burgers has over 100 franchisees, and its franchise agreement states that all franchisees must offer menu items as directed by Quark's Burgers, and that the failure to do so could result in the immediate termination of the franchise. Ben bought the franchise because he was a vegetarian, and its menu was free of meat products. In addition, Ben's religion forbids the eating of any meat products.
Ben's franchise was very successful, and every year he received an award from Quark's Burgers for being one of the top 10% of its franchisees.
In April 2019 Quark's Burgers changed its menu; among the changes included breakfast sandwiches with bacon, ham, or sausage. Ben refused to sell these items at his store on the ground that his religion forbids the eating of pork products.
In January 2020 Ben opened a second franchise, at which he also refused to sell products with meat products. Ben's franchises…
Chapter 4 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In 1975, after the war in Vietnam, the U.S. government discontinued draft registration for men in this country. In 1980, after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, President Jimmy Carter asked Congress for funds to reactivate draft registration. President Carter suggested that both males and females be required to register. Congress allocated funds only for the registration of males. Several men who were subject to draft registration brought a lawsuit that challenged the law as being unconstitutional, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the draft registration law, reasoning as follows: The question of registering women for the draft not only received considerable national attention and was the subject of wide-ranging public debate, but also was extensively considered by Congress in hearings, floor debate, and in committee. The foregoing clearly establishes that the decision to exempt women…arrow_forwardThe Abercrombie & Fitch Religious Discrimination Case The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 2015 case involving Abercrombie & Fitch, ruled that that “an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant for work if the employer was motivated by avoiding the need to accommodate a religious practice,” and that doing so violates the prohibition against religious discrimination contained in the CRA of 1964, Title VII. According to the EEOC general counsel David Lopez, “This case is about defending the American principles of religious freedom and tolerance. This decision is a victory for our increasingly diverse society.”22 The case arose when, as part of her Muslim faith, a teenage girl named Samantha Elauf wore a hijab (headscarf) to a job interview with Abercrombie & Fitch. Elauf was denied a job because she did not conform to the company’s “Look Policy,” which Abercrombie claimed banned head coverings. Elauf filed a complaint with the EEOC alleging religious discrimination, and the EEOC,…arrow_forwardADMINISTRATIVE LAW The University Statutes allows the promulgation of rules relating to highway signs in order to "promote the safe operation of motor vehicles and advance the greater public good ". At a Transport Committee meeting that was unannounced and not open to the public, the University promulgated "Regulation A” which provides: No new vehicle shall be granted access in the University until the University’s accidental highway death rate decreases for at least two consecutive years. The members of the University did not keep any meeting notes or other record of their discussions at the meeting. "Regulation A" did not set out any process for a challenge or variance. Bob has purchased a new vehicle and wants to use it in connection with his work at the University. He is prohibited from doing so by "Regulation A" because the University’s rate of accidental highway deaths has yet to decrease. QUESTION: d)Discuss challenges to "Regulation A" that Bob may bring.arrow_forward
- Catherine Bosley worked as a television news anchor for WKBN Channel 27 in Youngstown, Ohio. While on vacation with her husband in Florida she participated in a “wet t-shirt” contest, which was videotaped without her consent by DreamGirls, Inc. and licensed to Marvad Corp., which runs a Web site for adult entertainment through a subscription service on the Internet. Marvad used depictions of her in advertisements to promote the materials and services it markets. Web site searches related to Catherine Bosley in 2004 were the most popular search on the World Wide Web. Due to the publicity, she resigned from her position at WKBN. Bosley sought an injunction against the defendants from using her image in any manner that promotes the sale of their goods or services. The defendants contend that an injunction would violate their First Amendment rights. [Bosley v. Wildwett.com, 310 F. Supp. 2d 914 (N.D. Ohio)] 2.2. ) Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (i.e., in the section for…arrow_forwardA State statute empowered public school principals to suspend students for up to ten days without any notice or hearing. A student who was suspended for ten days challenges the constitutionality of his suspension on the ground that he was denied due process. Was due process denied? Explain.arrow_forwardIn order to police the profession, the state legislature has just passed a law permitting the State Plumbers’ Association the power to hold hearings to determine whether a particular plumber has violated the plumbing code of ethics, written by the association. Sam, a plumber, objects to the convening of a hearing when he is accused by Roger, a fellow plumber, of acting unethically by soliciting business from Roger’s customers. Sam goes to court, seeking to enjoin the association’s disciplinary committee from holding the hearing. What is the result? How would you argue Sam’s case? The association’s case? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- Post to “The California “Home Protection Bill of Rights” presumes that a person using deadly force on an intruder acted in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or a member of the household. Do you agree or disagree with such a presumption? Does the castle doctrine encourage gun ownership?”arrow_forwardAssume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.arrow_forwardThe National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. §§ 4301-06, exempts certain joint research, development and production activities from the per se rule of antitrust liability, and from the automatic award of attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who successfully challenges such activities under the antitrust laws. For parties that notify the antitrust agencies of their intent to engage in such activities, it also requires “detrebling” – successful antitrust plaintiffs are entitled only to single damages. Do you support this legislation? Why or why not? Would you support extending these same protections to all competitive conduct that is subject to the US antitrust laws? Which categories of conduct would you include or exclude from such protection? Explain your reasoning.arrow_forward
- Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes illegal to discriminate against someone based on seven Acts; list and explain each one.arrow_forwardDistinguish between justice and rights.arrow_forwardAnnalise suffers from a mental illness but is nonetheless capable of working for the Office of Child Support in Wayne County. She was fired from her job when it was learned that she had misappropriated approximately $2,000 in state funds. Annalise filed a complaint with her union, claiming the DNR violated a state law against discriminating against someone because they suffer from a mental illness. The case went to arbitration, and the arbitrator concluded that Annalise had been dismissed without "just cause," because her acts were caused by her mental illness and were not “within her capacity to control." The county appealed the decision to a court. How should the court rule? a. The Court should reverse the arbitrator’s decision because the County’s dismissal of Annalise was not to discriminate against the mentally ill but because she knowingly misappropriated County money. b. The Court should void the arbitration agreement (meaning that the agreement is not…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education