KPMG
(LO 1, 2, 3)
KPMG LLP served as the external auditor for some of the largest sub-prime mortgage lenders in the U.S. leading up to and during the housing market crisis of the mid to late-2000s. The audits of two of their largest lending clients, New Century Financial Corporation and Countrywide, ultimately led the firm to settle litigation charges in 2010 for $44.7 and $24 million, respectively. The business model of these two subprime mortgage lenders consisted of providing loans to borrowers with weak credit histories. The business model had begun to fail during 2007, when the economy weakened, borrowers began defaulting, and home prices declined drastically. New Century filed for bankruptcy and Countrywide was purchased by Bank of America, which subsequently suffered massive losses related to business failures at Countrywide.
Just before the housing crash of 2007 put the companies in severe financial crises, KPMG had given both companies unqualified audit opinions. In both cases, KPMG was subsequently accused of violating professional standards, lacking independence, and being negligent. K PMG defended itself by arguing that its audits were not the cause of the financial woes at New century and Countrywide. Rather, the firm contended that the failed business model of the two companies led to investor losses.
a. How does the economic environment affect the litigation risk faced by audit firms?
b. Should auditors be held liable if their client’s business fails or if the financial statements contain a fraud that the auditors did not detect?
c. What defenses do auditors use in response to litigation?
d. What actions can auditors take to minimize litigation exposure?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK AUDITING: A RISK BASED-APPROACH
- Hatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forwardHatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forwardHatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forward
- Bengston, CPA, is conducting the audit of Pollution ControlDevices, Inc. In addition, a supplemental negative assurance report is required to a majormortgage holder. The supplemental report concerns indenture agreements to keep theclient from defaulting on the mortgage. Total assets are $14 million and the mortgage isfor $4 million. The major provisions of the indentures are as follows:1. The current ratio must be maintained above 2.3 to 1.2. The debt/equity ratio must be maintained below 3.0.3. Net earnings after taxes must exceed dividends paid by at least $1 million.a. Write the appropriate supplemental report if all three indenture agreement provisions have been satisfied.b. How would the supplemental report change if net earnings after taxes were $1,010,000and dividends paid were $60,000?c. Assume the same situation as in part b. and also assume that the client refuses tomodify the financial statements or disclose the violation of the indenture agreementprovisions on the grounds…arrow_forwardUntil its involvement as Enron’s auditor, Arthur Andersen was recognized as one of the most respected CPA firms in the world. Arthur Andersen, as did other large CPA firms, operated as a limited liability corporation, or LLC. At the time that its involvement as Enron’s auditor was making news every day, an article in The Wall Street Journal stated that it wasn’t clear whether the LLC form of organization was going to offer Andersen’s partners protection from creditors’ lawsuits or whether creditors would be able to take the personal assets of Andersen’s partners. Assume that Andersen had 2,000 partners and that creditor claims in the Enron case totaled $50 billion. Would failure to report the litigation constitute financial statement fraud?arrow_forwardUntil its involvement as Enron’s auditor, Arthur Andersen was recognized as one of the most respected CPA firms in the world. Arthur Andersen, as did other large CPA firms, operated as a limited liability corporation, or LLC. At the time that its involvement as Enron’s auditor was making news every day, an article in The Wall Street Journal stated that it wasn’t clear whether the LLC form of organization was going to offer Andersen’s partners protection from creditors’ lawsuits or whether creditors would be able to take the personal assets of Andersen’s partners. Assume that Andersen had 2,000 partners and that creditor claims in the Enron case totaled $50 billion. If Arthur Andersen was a corporation, how would you expect to see creditor litigation reported in the financial statements?arrow_forward
- Kay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forwardKay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forwardKay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forward
- Chelsea Bank provided overdraft facilities to Liverpool Ltd and Manchester & Co. were Liverpool’s auditors. The relevant overdraft facility letters between Chelsea Bank and Liverpool Ltd contained a clause requiring Manchester & Co. to send Chelsea Bank, each year, a copy of the annual audited financial statements.In 2018 Liverpool Ltd was put into receivership with approximately $23.5M owing to Chelsea Bank. Chelsea Bank claimed that, due to massive fraud, Liverpool’s financial statements for the previous years had misstated the financial position of Liverpool and Manchester & Co. had been negligent in not detecting the fraud. Chelsea Bank contended that it had continued to provide the overdraft facilities in reliance on Manchester’s unqualified opinions.Manchester & Co. applied to the court for an order striking out the claim on the grounds that, even if all the facts alleged by Chelsea Bank were true, the claim could not succeed in law because Manchester & Co.…arrow_forwardChelsea Bank provided overdraft facilities to Liverpool Ltd and Manchester & Co. were Liverpool’s auditors. The relevant overdraft facility letters between Chelsea Bank and Liverpool Ltd contained a clause requiring Manchester & Co. to send Chelsea Bank, each year, a copy of the annual audited financial statements.In 2018 Liverpool Ltd was put into receivership with approximately $23.5M owing to Chelsea Bank. Chelsea Bank claimed that, due to massive fraud, Liverpool’s financial statements for the previous years had misstated the financial position of Liverpool and Manchester & Co. had been negligent in not detecting the fraud. Chelsea Bank contended that it had continued to provide the overdraft facilities in reliance on Manchester’s unqualified opinions.Manchester & Co. applied to the court for an order striking out the claim on the grounds that, even if all the facts alleged by Chelsea Bank were true, the claim could not succeed in law because Manchester & Co.…arrow_forwardThe accounting firm involved in this case wants to know if their independence will be questioned by the BOA. You have been asked to submit an analysis and conclusion. 2. Franklin Rosario is an audit manager in the Salvador & Santos accounting firm. He has just been assigned to the audit of the Starex Money Market Fund. Franklin has maintained a money market account with SMMF since it opened in 2008. All his savings, amounting to 75 percent of his total assets, are in this account, which pays the highest interest available in money market funds. However, his account constitutes only .00001 percent of the fund's assets.arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:CengageCornerstones of Financial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337690881Author:Jay Rich, Jeff JonesPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage LearningEBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT