Plainville Hospital has three wings ( A , B , and C ). The nurses in the hospital are assigned to the three wings based on the number of beds in each wing, shown in Table 4 − 30 _ . Table 4-30 Wing A B C Number of beds 154 66 30 a. Suppose there are 20 nurses working at the hospital. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on Table 4 − 30 _ . b. Suppose an additional nurse is hired at the hospital, bringing the total number of nurses to 21 . Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on Table 4 − 30 _ . c. Compare your answers in (a) and (b). What is strange about the two apportionments?
Plainville Hospital has three wings ( A , B , and C ). The nurses in the hospital are assigned to the three wings based on the number of beds in each wing, shown in Table 4 − 30 _ . Table 4-30 Wing A B C Number of beds 154 66 30 a. Suppose there are 20 nurses working at the hospital. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on Table 4 − 30 _ . b. Suppose an additional nurse is hired at the hospital, bringing the total number of nurses to 21 . Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on Table 4 − 30 _ . c. Compare your answers in (a) and (b). What is strange about the two apportionments?
Solution Summary: The author explains the apportionment under Hamilton's method of the nurses at the hospital.
Plainville Hospital has three wings (
A
,
B
, and
C
). The nurses in the hospital are assigned to the three wings based on the number of beds in each wing, shown in
Table
4
−
30
_
.
Table 4-30
Wing
A
B
C
Number of beds
154
66
30
a. Suppose there are
20
nurses working at the hospital. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on
Table
4
−
30
_
.
b. Suppose an additional nurse is hired at the hospital, bringing the total number of nurses to
21
. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the nurses to the wings based on
Table
4
−
30
_
.
c. Compare your answers in (a) and (b). What is strange about the two apportionments?
1.
Prove the following arguments using the rules of inference. Do not make use of
conditional proof.
(а) а → (ЪЛс)
¬C
..¬a
(b) (pVq) →
→r
יור
(c) (c^h) → j
¬j
h
(d) s→ d
t
d
-d
..8A-t
(e) (pVg) (rv¬s)
Лѕ
קר .'
The graph of f(x) is given below. Select each true statement about the continuity of f(x) at x = 1.
Select all that apply:
☐ f(x) is not continuous at x = 1 because it is not defined at x = 1.
☐ f(x) is not continuous at x = 1 because lim f(x) does not exist.
x+1
☐ f(x) is not continuous at x = 1 because lim f(x) ‡ f(1).
x+→1
☐ f(x) is continuous at x = 1.
2. Consider the following argument:
(a)
Seabiscuit is a thoroughbred.
Seabiscuit is very fast.
Every very fast racehorse can win the race.
.. Therefore, some thoroughbred racehorse can win the race.
Let us define the following predicates, whose domain is racehorses:
T(x) x is a thoroughbred
F(x) x is very fast
R(x) x can win the race
:
Write the above argument in logical symbols using these predicates.
(b)
Prove the argument using the rules of inference. Do not make use of conditional
proof.
(c)
Rewrite the proof using full sentences, avoiding logical symbols. It does not
need to mention the names of rules of inference, but a fellow CSE 16 student should be
able to understand the logical reasoning.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.