If satisficing settling for second best. Introduction: Satisficing: Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

1.1 Discuss any FIVE (5) leadership failures of ‘The company founder and former CEO, Elizabeth Holmes’. Identify FIVE (5) elements of leadership and evaluate the outcome of the organisation if each element was used correctly by the former CEO. Your answers should be supported by academic sources where applicable. Make reference to the case study.

write a paper on the topic: The importance of soft skills when hiring. Introduction Definition of soft skills and their relevance in the workplace. A brief overview of the traditional focus on hard skills during hiring. Pros and cons of the topic Importance of the topic Thesis statement: Soft skills are essential for a well-rounded employee, facilitating teamwork, communication, and adaptability. Literature Review: Scholarly review of soft skills definition Scholarly review of the relevance of soft skills for employment A scholarly review of the emergence of soft skills Discussion The role of soft skills in effective communication. Importance of clear expression in team settings. Ability to listen actively and respond appropriately. Examples of how strong communicators can enhance collaboration within teams. The significance of teamwork and interpersonal relationships in the workplace. Soft skills as a foundation for building trust among colleagues. The impact on project…

I have been hired by the Transnational Electronics (TE) Corporation, an international retail electronics company, as their Human Resources Director. I report to the Chief Human Resource officer of the company. TE has over 900 hundred employees in 11 different nations, including Mexico. They have revenues in excess of 1 billion US dollars per year. I need to hire a Training and Development Specialist for the Mexico City, Mexico regional office. what is the purpose of the HR Training and Development specialist and why does this job exist? Where does it fit into the HR function and how does it relate to the corporate structure? What are the differences between this position in the U.S. and one in Mexico City?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1TAI

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If satisficing settling for second best.

Introduction:

Satisficing:

Making decisions and pursuing the course of action which will satisfy the basic necessities to achieve a goal. It is a strategy used in decision making that involves searching alternatives and coming up the best solution which meets the requirements.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Solution:

A study on if satisficing is settling for second best or not?

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

Satisficing is called second best as it is not the first choice. But satisficing is not bad as it still gives hope. Managers look into alternatives. Sometimes the alternate plans turn out to be better than the intended one. So instead of being negative on it, we can take up satisficing positively.

At times, managers need to compromise on the best idea looking into the various factors involved in the post actions of decision making. Decision making is a crucial aspect in business, and decision should be wisely taken keeping in mind all the aspects of the organisation and consequences.

Examples for Satisficing:

Bargaining for the best price is important but over bargaining is not recommended. It is better to settle for a good price rather than losing the deal.
Raw products are available at your place for cheaper price, but trying to get raw materials from a far off place just because the cost is a little lesser is stupidity. Satisficing is handy here.

Pros of Satisficing:

Time saver.
Avoidance of unwanted perfectionism.
Works within the capacity and ability of the organisation.
Satisficing gives more satisfaction than maximising.
According to studies, satisficers has lesser regrets and anxiety.
Budget work plan is formed. Unwanted expenses can be avoided.
Satisficing helps in maximising profits.
Satisfies shareholders.
Confidence is maintained among investors in the management.

Maximisers always want the best. They never settle, which not a good thing is all the time. Investment, budget, capital of the organisation should all be taken into account. To get the best, if resources are not taken into account and vague decisions are made, the organisation has to undergo lot of complications later. Satisficers keep the best in mind, but go through alternates and choose what is best with the available resources. Hence, even if it is second best, the organisation need not undergo many complications in the future.

Reasons for Satisficing:

Sacrificing short term profit, in order to concentrate on the long term profit.
Limited resources.
Diversified Entrepreneurship.
Age and background of owners can also add up as a factor.
Strategies and efforts for the betterment of the organisation.
In order to deal with difficult situations.
Risk management. To avoid fatal risks in advance.

Organisation must be maximises when it is capable of taking all risks and have enough resources and capitals to bring the plans into actions. Maximising should not bankrupt the organisation. If that is the case, an organisation should always choose satisficing and look into the alternates.

Answer 12

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1TAI Ch. 4 - Prob. 2TAI Ch. 4 - Prob. 3TAI Ch. 4 - Prob. 4TAI Ch. 4 - Paying college athletes: Who are the stakeholders...Ch. 4 - Prob. 6TAI Ch. 4 - Prob. 1DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 2DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 3DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 4DQ

Concept explainers

Answer to Problem 1TAI

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions