Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781305506381
Author: James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 4, Problem 1E

(a)

To determine

Estimated regression line.

(a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The formula for the regression equation is:

  Y^=a+bX^Here,a is estimated intercept coefficientb is estimated slope coefficient

Run the ordinary least squares method for the given data in excel. The results drawn are as follows:

  Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List), Chapter 4, Problem 1E , additional homework tip  1

Use the summary output to find the estimated regression equation as follows:

  Y^=321.24 + 0.03A^ -12.44P^ + 2.08M^Here,Y^= estimated sales in thousands gallonsA^=estimated promotional expenditures in $1,000P^=estimated selling price in $/gallonM^=estimated disposable income in $1,000

(b)

To determine

The economic interpretation of the estimated intercept (a) and slope (b) coefficients.

(b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Interpretation of estimated intercept (a) coefficient:

When the selling price, promotional expenditure and disposable income are zero, on average the quantity sold of pens is equal to 321.24× $1000 = $321,240.

Interpretation of estimated slope (b) coefficient:

For a given level of selling price and disposable income, an additional $1,000 promotional expenditures lead to a rise in sales by 0.03×1000 = 30 gallons on average.

For a given level of promotional expenditure and selling price, an additional $1,000 disposable income leads to a rise in sales by 2.08×1000 = 2,080 gallons on an average.

For a given level of promotional expenditure and disposable income, an additional $1/gallon lead to falling in sales by 12.44×1000 = 12,440 gallons on an average.

(c)

To determine

The hypothesis that there is no relationship between the variables at 0.05 significance level.

(c)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Conduct the t-test to know the statistical significance of the independent variables A, Pand M. The test statistic can be calculated using the following formula:

  T = b ^ 1 s b 1

   Here,

   b ^ 1  is coefficient of estimated independent variable

   s b 1  is standard error of coefficient of estimated independent variable

The t-statistic follows t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom.

For variable A, t-test is conducted as follows:

According to the summary output, the t-statistic for A variable is equal to 0.16.

At 5% significance level and 10-1=9 degrees of freedom, the critical value is equal to 2.262.

  Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List), Chapter 4, Problem 1E , additional homework tip  2

In figure (1), since the calculated t-statistic lies in the acceptance region. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. This means that the variable A is not statistically significant.

For variable P, t-test is conducted as follows:

According to the summary output, the t-statistic for P variable is equal to -2.89. At 5% significance level and 10-1=9 degrees of freedom, the critical value is equal to 2.262.

  Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List), Chapter 4, Problem 1E , additional homework tip  3

In figure (2), since the calculated t-statistic lies in the critical region. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. This means that the variable Pis statistically significant.

For variable M, t-test is conducted as follows:

According to the summary output, the t-statistic for M variable is equal to 0.69.

At 5% significance level and 10-1=9 degrees of freedom, the critical value is equal to 2.262.

  Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List), Chapter 4, Problem 1E , additional homework tip  4

In figure (3), since the calculated t-statistic lies in the acceptance region. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. This means that the M variable is not statistically significant.

(d)

To determine

Coefficient of determination.

(d)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The coefficient of determination measures the proportion of variance predicted by the independent variable in the dependent variable. It is denoted as R2.

According to the summary output, the value of R2 is equal to 0.81. This means that the regression equation predicts 81% of the variance in sales.

(e)

To determine

Analysis of variance on the regression including F-test of the overall significance of the results.

(e)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The value of F-statistic is given as 8.40. And the critical value at 0.05 significance level is equal to 0.01.

Since F-statistic is greater than the critical value, thus, the overall model is statistically significant.

(f)

To determine

Best estimate of the product sales when the selling price is $14.50. And an approximate 95 percent prediction interval.

(f)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

According to the regression statistics of the summary output, for a given level of promotional expenditure and disposable income, $14.50/gallon lead to fall in sales by 12.44×14.50×1000 = 180,380 gallons on an average.

According to the regression statistics in the summary output, a 95% confidence interval for the P variable ranges from -22.99 to -1.89.

(g)

To determine

Price elasticity of demand at a selling price of $14.50.

(g)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Formula to calculate elasticity in linear regression model is as follows:

  Elasticity = b×(PY)

At given value of P variable equal to 14.50, the estimated value of Y variable is equal to 180,380.

Thus, price elasticity of demand is calculated as follows:

  Elasticity = -12.44×( 14.50 180,380)= -0.001

Thus, the price elasticity of demand at a selling price of $14.50 is equal to -0.001.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning