Percentage change in rooting of fans.
Explanation of Solution
The NFL, NBA, and MLB are the main sports events or leagues that are prominent in the US economy. The NFL stands for Football, NBA for basketball, and MLB for baseball. These are the main sports leagues in the US economy that has a
When there are two teams in the major leagues from the same place, the sports fans will prefer the team which has the highest success rate in the matches. It is evident from the history of the NFL, NBA, and MLB that the number of fan followers and viewers in the gallery decreased by 10 percent to more than 40 percent from 2008 to 2018. This is not the case with all the teams that play in the leagues. The teams with higher success rates do not face such drop issues. That means the performance of the team determines the number of viewers and fans for a team.
The percentage of fans rooting their interest in one of the teams will remain rooted to the team until when the team maintains a successful streak or keeps winning often in the leagues. When the team fails to fulfill these demands from the fans, the fans will start to change their rooting interests toward the other team. This is because the psychology of the people does not allow them to spend too much on the tickets and argue for the team that ends up failing in the matches.
The change in the percentage of fans rooting their interest between the two teams that are present in the NFL, NBA, and MLB cannot be determined, as there will be very strong fans and weak fans for each team. The strong fans will remain rooted to their team whatever happens in the leagues, whereas the weak fans will keep shifting their rooting between the teams based on their performances in the leagues.
Monopoly: Monopoly is a market structure where there is only a single seller in the market and there are no close competitors present in the market. The complete market power will be with the single producer and the price will be determined by the seller.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
The Economics of Sports
- Why does Tiger WoodsLinks to an external site. play in Asia and Australia late in the season when it’s no secret that he’d really only like to play four events per year if he could (the major championships)? It all comes down to cold hard cash. Woods’ appearance fee is $3 million and there are tournaments in Asia and Australia willing to shell out that kind of money for Woods’ presence. (Bleacherreport.com, "PGA Tour: Is It Time To Reconsider Appearance Fees?" Jan. 2011). If Tiger's appearance fee is the result of a Nash bargaining equilibrium, how much does his participation in these golf tournaments increase tournament revenues? Explain briefly. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardWhat is increase in diversity in gamesarrow_forwardIf a Customer or Supplier to my company offered me and my family free tickets to a coveted sports event with no conditions attached, I would?arrow_forward
- Which theory emphasizes that diverse teams leverage differences to achieve team synergy? A)Uniformity theory B)Conformity theory C)Homogeneity theory D)Diverse team development theoryarrow_forwardEconomics Present an example of a prisoner's dilemma in your own life. Describe the “cooperative" action for each player that involves trusting the other in some sense. Explain why mutual cooperation will lead to an outcome that is preferred to mutual defection. Describe why there is an incentive for each to defect, or not cooperate, or not be trustworthy. Discuss what might be done to promote mutual cooperation, or what is done.arrow_forwardProblem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gain an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping (the athletes believe the advantage over their competitor outweighs the risks from doping ). However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping. What outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Please use ideas like concepts of monopolies, Oligopolies and Game Theory and Factor markets for this scenario.arrow_forward
- Distinguish between different types of financing available to sport organizationsarrow_forwardInvestigate the issues regarding public/private/cooperative financing of sports organizations.arrow_forwardEconomics Suppose that Russell Wilson is negotiating a contract with the Seattle Seahawks. Wilson has an offer from the Las Vegas Raiders for $30 million a year. If he signs with the Seahawks, they will earn $60 million in revenue from the signing. The Seahawks next best option is to sign Josh Allen. They would earn $45 million from signing Allen and would pay him a contract of $25 million. Russell Wilson and the Seahawks have equal bargaining power in the sense that they will split the surplus evenly. a) What is the negotiated salary between Wilson and the Seahawks under Nash Bargaining? What is Wilson's surplus and what is Seahawks surplus? b) Suppose that the Seahawks know about an injury to Josh Allen, such that they would only earn $30 million in revenue from signing Allen but would only have to pay him a contract of $20 million. What is the new negotiated salary between Wilson and the Seahawks under Nash Bargaining? What is Wilson's surplus and what is Seahawks surplus?arrow_forward
- QUESTION 8 The table below shows how much the a non-Manchester United fan and a Manchester United fan would pay for an annual subscription to Manchester United TV. The marketing team at Manchester United decides to offer two packages: a basic package that includes all games of the main, youth and women's teams (delayed by one day) and a deluxe package that includes the games (delayed by one day), recording of games from past seasons, and exclusive player interviews. Because there are many more non-Manchester United fans, the marketing team decides to offer the basic package for $30 to attract these fans. What is the maximum price they can charge for the deluxe package if they want Manchester United fans to subscribe to the deluxe package rather than also subscribing to the basic package. Manchester United TV Subscription (annual) Value to a non-Manchester United soccer fan Value to Manchester United fans Basic Package $30 $120 Deluxe Package $40 $200 O 119.99 O 109.99 189.99 O 179 99arrow_forwardIf you add more money to the economy, you might expect to see: More suppliers to meet the demand unleashed by the extra cash A move to oligopoly from the free market as big companies become bigger Fewer suppliers to meet the demand unleashed by the extra cash Drmand move to other products; the extra cash won't affect this supply-demand relationship.arrow_forwardAn expansion team in a professional sports league is considering locating in one of three cities, A, B, or C. The team estimates that its profit in the three cities, excluding the cost of building a stadium, will be: city A $195 million city B = $200 million city C $210 million The cost of the stadium in any city will be $100 million, but the team expects the winning city to subsidize at least some of this cost. Finally, suppose that each city expects the team to generate the following additional (spillover) economic activity: city A = $75 million city B $60 million city C= $45 million 21. It is efficient for the team to locate in (a) City A. (b) City B. (c) City C. (d) The net return is the same for all three. 22. The net social gain in the efficient city is (a) $210 (b) $270 (c) $170 (d) $155 23. The efficient city will (just) outbid the second-highest bidder if it bids at least (a) $75 (b) S70 (c) $65 (d) $55 A person is considering placing a bet of S100 on team to win a sporting…arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning