Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781285165875
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 34, Problem 4PA
To determine
Impact of tax cut.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What happens to the Aggregate Demand (AD) when there is an increase in Government purchases.
If there is an increase in government expenditures and an increase in taxes by an equal amount by how much will the
aggregate demand increase?
The Japanese government decides to stimulate the economy by increasing direct spending by $70 billion.
If the final change in real GDP is $280 billion, what is Japanese consumers' marginal propensity to consume (MPC)? Please round your answer to two decimal places.
Chapter 34 Solutions
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In 2006, the U.S. economy experienced an inflationary gap when the economy was booming and the unemployment rate was low. Would you consider a tax increase in that period to be demand-side focused, supply-side focused or both? What would be the impact of this policy on the price level and the real GDP? Explain.arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $13.37 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.33 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardConsider two policies: a tax cut that will last for only one year and a tax cut that is expected to be permanent. True or False: A tax cut that is expected to be permanent will have a greater impact on aggregate demand than a tax cut that will last for only one year. True Falsearrow_forward
- Suppose actual real GDP is $13.56 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.34 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.74. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.90 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardConsider the graph at right showing an economy in recession. Aggregate demand is currently at AD. Equilibrium currently occurs at Eo. If aggregate demand was ADF, there would be full employment. Suppose the government engages in fiscal policy that results in full crowding out. Using the line drawing tool, draw the new demand curve that shows full crowding out. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required object. Price level Eo EF ADO F Real GDP per Year ($ trillions) SRASO ADF O Uarrow_forwardConsider an economy that is operating below the full-employment level of real GDP. What would be the effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand and real GDP?arrow_forward
- In February 2021, retail sales fell by 3.3% compared to January. What does the drop in retail sales indicate about how consumption has changed? Investment spending fell by 2.2% in February. How will these changes affect aggregate expenditures? How will equilibrium GDP be affected? How do you think the stimulus checks that many Americans will receive will affect consumption? How will that affect aggregate expenditures and GDP and employment? Do you expect the change in aggregate expenditures be temporary or permanent? Part of the stimulus package passed by Biden includes an extra $300 per week in unemployment benefits. Do you agree with the stimulus checks and additional $300 per week in unemployment benefits? Why or why not?arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $13.74 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.69 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.6. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.61 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.) Correct Answer: 3.38 Please solve to get that same answerarrow_forwardWhich of the following is not an example of government spending hike that will increase aggregate demand? Answers: A. Unemployment compensation. B. Government purchase of new military jet fighters. C. The construction of a new highway. D. Government purchase of new health care plan for retirees.arrow_forward
- Suppose actual real GDP is $9.06 trillion, potential real GDP is $6.42 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.59. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardConsider a hypothetical closed economy in which there are no income taxes. If households spend $0.75 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remainder, the expenditure multiplier for this economy is The following graph shows the initial aggregate demand (AD) and short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) curves of this economy. Suppose that the economy is currently in a recession. Business firms are pessimistic about the future and do not respond to a fall in interest rates. In addition, all households are pessimistic about job prospects and desire to consume less and save more at all levels of income. As a result, personal consumption in this economy decreases by $1 billion. The reduction in personal consumption will lead to a decrease in aggregate demand by S Shift either the AD curve or the SRAS curve, or both, to show the new aggregate demand curve after the full impact of the multiplier process of the reduction in personal consumption has taken place. PRICE LEVEL (Billions of…arrow_forwardThe country is experiencing a serious rise in inflation which the government wants to control through fiscal policy. The Government will decrease spending by $20 million and increase taxes by $15 million. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.80. What will be the effect on GDP and by how much? A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let's say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes to close the recessionary gap. How much will be the tax decrease? An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let's say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume the MPC equals .80. How much will the tax increase be? The government wants to achieve a balanced budget. It therefore increases…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning