Subpart (a):
The
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
The production possibility frontier for country Latvia is given in figure 1 as follows:
From figure 1, it can be inferred that if all the resources are employed in the production of tractors then, at most 75,000 tractors can be produced and if all resources are employed in the production of Bobsleds then. 225,000 bobsleds can be produced.
The production possibility frontier for country Estonia is given in figure 2 as follows:
From figure 2, it can be inferred that if all the resources are employed in the production of tractors then, at most 37,500 tractors can be produced and if all resources are employed in the production of Bobsleds then. 75,000 bobsleds can be produced.
Concept Introduction:
Production possibilities frontier: It is a graph that shows the combinations of output that the economy can possibly produce the given available factors of production and the available production technology.
Subpart (b):
The
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost of producing Tractors for Latvia (OCLT) can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost for Latvia to produce one tractor is 3 bobsleds.
The opportunity cost of producing Tractors for Estonia (OCET) can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost for Estonia to produce one tractor is 2 bobsleds.
Since Estonia incurs a lower opportunity cost in the production of tractors then, Estonia has a comparative advantage in tractor production than Latvia.
The opportunity cost of producing Bobsleds for Latvia (OCLB) can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost for Latvia to produce one bobsled is 1/3 tractors.
The opportunity cost of producing Bobsleds for Estonia (OCEB) can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost for Estonia to produce one bobsled is 1/2 tractors.
Since Latvia incurs a lower opportunity cost in the production of bobsleds then, Latvia has a comparative advantage in bobsleds production than Estonia.
Since both have comparative advantages, they will definitely engage in the trade.
Concept Introduction:
Opportunity cost: The opportunity cost refers to the value of what one has to give up in order to choose another alternative.
Comparative advantage: It is the ability of a producer, firm or country to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost of production than the competitors.
Subpart (c):
The agreement of exchange.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
If a trade’s agreement is negotiated, any agreement between 2 bobsleds and 3 bobsleds per tractor will benefit both countries’ trade and specialization.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 33 Solutions
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forward
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forward
- Please answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forward
- O’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forwardThe cost of garbage pickup in Green Gulch is $4,500,000 for Year 1. The population is increasing at 6%, the nominal cost per ton is increasing at 5%, and the general inflation rate is estimated at 4%.(a) Estimate the cost in Year 4 in Year-1 dollars and in nominal dollars.(b) Reference a data source for trends in volume of garbage per person. How does including this change your answer? Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be $6.20M, $5.2M, thank you.arrow_forwardPlease show each step with formulas, don't use Excel. The answer should be 4 years, $16,861.arrow_forward