Subpart (a):
Growth rate in real
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
The growth rate in real GDP can be calculated using the following formula:
Using the formula (1), the growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2012 of United States, El Salvador, Republic of South Africa, Cambodia, and Russia can be calculated as follows:
Real GDP growth rate in U.S. is 2.321%.
Table-1 shows the real GDP growth rate in different countries, which is obtained using Equation (1).
Table-1
Country | Growth rate |
U.S. | 2.32% |
El Salvador | 1.87% |
Republic of South Africa | 2.47% |
Cambodia | 7.35% |
Russia | 3.44% |
Among these five countries, Cambodia experienced the highest rate of
Concept introduction:
Growth in real GDP: Growth in real GDP measures the changes of real GDP from one year to another year.
Sub part (b):
Growth rate in real GDP from 2012 to 2013.
Sub part (b):
Explanation of Solution
Table-1 shows the real GDP growth rate from 2012 to 2013 in different countries, which is obtained using Equation (1).
Table -1
Country | Growth rate |
U.S. | 2.22% |
El Salvador | 1.7% |
Republic of South Africa | 1.89% |
Cambodia | 7.47% |
Russia | 0.25% |
Among these five countries, Cambodia experienced the highest rate of economic growth from 2012 to2013.
Concept introduction:
GDP growth rate: Growth rate of GDP measures the changes of GDP in one year to another year in an economy.
Subpart (c):
Growth rate in real GDP from 2013 to 2014.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Table-1 shows the real GDP growth rate from 2013 to 2014 in different countries, which is obtained using Equation (1).
Table -1
Country | Growth rate |
U.S. | 2.29% |
El Salvador | 1.92% |
Republic of South Africa | 2.62% |
Cambodia | 7.38% |
Russia | 1.67% |
Among these five countries, Cambodia experienced the highest rate of economic growth from 2013 to2014.
Concept introduction:
GDP growth rate: Growth rate of GDP measures the changes of GDP from one year to another year in an economy.
Sub part d):
Annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014.
Sub part d):
Explanation of Solution
The average annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014 for U.S. can be calculated as the sum total growth rates divided by 3 as follows:
Annual growth rate of real GDP I U.S. is 2.29%.
The average annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014 for El Salvador can be calculated as the sum of the total growth rates divided by 3 as follows:
Annual growth rate of real GDP in EL Salvador is 1.92%.
The average annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014 for Republic of South Africa can be calculated as the sum of the total growth rates divided by 3 as follows:
Annual growth rate of real GDP in Republic of South Africa is 2.62%.
The average annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014 for Cambodia can be calculated as the sum of the total growth rates divided by 3 as follows:
Annual growth rate of real GDP in Cambodia is 7.38%.
The average annual growth rate in real GDP from 2011 to 2014 for Russia can be calculated as the sum total growth rates divided by 3 as follows:
Annual growth rate of real GDP in Russia is 1.67%.
Among these five countries, Cambodia experienced the highest average annual rate of economic growth from 2013 to2014.
Concept introduction:
Annual GDP growth rate: Annual growth rate of GDP measures by dividing the total growth rate with the number of years.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 31 Solutions
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
- Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forward
- presentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forward
- compare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forward
- Bill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forwardThe cost of garbage pickup in Green Gulch is $4,500,000 for Year 1. The population is increasing at 6%, the nominal cost per ton is increasing at 5%, and the general inflation rate is estimated at 4%.(a) Estimate the cost in Year 4 in Year-1 dollars and in nominal dollars.(b) Reference a data source for trends in volume of garbage per person. How does including this change your answer? Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be $6.20M, $5.2M, thank you.arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc