The Essentials of Statistics: A Tool for Social Research
The Essentials of Statistics: A Tool for Social Research
4th Edition
ISBN: 9781305802698
Author: Joseph F. Healey
Publisher: Cengage Learning US
bartleby

Concept explainers

bartleby

Videos

Textbook Question
Book Icon
Chapter 3, Problem 3.6P

SOC The following tables list the median family incomes for the 13 Canadian provinces and territories in 2000 and 2011 and for 13 states of the United States in 1999 and 2012. For the provinces and the states, compute the mean and median family income for each year and compare the two measures of central tendency. Which measure of central tendency is greater for each year? Are the distribution skewed? In which direction?

Median Income for Canadian Provinces and Territories, 2000 and 2011 (Canadians dollars)
Province or Territory 2000 2011
Newfoundland and Labrador 38,800 67,200
Prince Edward Island 44,200 66,500
Nova Scotia 44,500 66,300
New Brunswick 43,200 63,930
Quebec 47,700 68,170
Ontario 55,700 73,290
Manitoba 47,300 68,710
Saskatchewan 45,800 77,300
Alberta 55,200 89,930
British Columbia 49,100 69,150
Yukon 56,000 90,090
Northwest Territories 61,000 105,560
Nunavut 37,600 65,280
Mean =
Median =

Source: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/famil108-eng-htm

Median Income for Thirteen States, 1999 and 2012 (U.S. dollars)
State 1999 2012
Alabama 36,213 43,464
Alaska 51,509 63,348
Arkansas 29,762 39,018
California 43,744 57,020
Connecticut 50,798 64,247
Illinois 46,392 51,738
Kansas 37,476 50,003
Maryland 52,310 71,836
Michigan 46,238 50,015
New York 40,058 47,680
Ohio 39,617 44,375
South Dakota 35,962 49,415
Texas 38,978 51,926
Mean =
Median =

Sources: 1999: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States:2001.p. 436. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/01statab/income.pdf.2012:U.S. Bureauof the Census. American Community Survey.2012. Retrieved form http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/statemedian/

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
What were the average sales for the four weeks prior to the experiment? What were the sales during the four weeks when the stores used the digital display? What is the mean difference in sales between the experimental and regular POP time periods? State the null hypothesis being tested by the paired sample t-test. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis? At a 95% significance level, was the difference significant? Explain why or why not using the results from the paired sample t-test. Should the manager of the retail chain install new digital displays in each store? Justify your answer.
A retail chain is interested in determining whether a digital video point-of-purchase (POP) display would stimulate higher sales for a brand advertised compared to the standard cardboard point-of-purchase display. To test this, a one-shot static group design experiment was conducted over a four-week period in 100 different stores. Fifty stores were randomly assigned to the control treatment (standard display) and the other 50 stores were randomly assigned to the experimental treatment (digital display). Compare the sales of the control group (standard POP) to the experimental group (digital POP). What were the average sales for the standard POP display (control group)? What were the sales for the digital display (experimental group)? What is the (mean) difference in sales between the experimental group and control group? List the null hypothesis being tested. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis based on the results of the independent t-test? Was the difference between the…
Question 4 An article in Quality Progress (May 2011, pp. 42-48) describes the use of factorial experiments to improve a silver powder production process. This product is used in conductive pastes to manufacture a wide variety of products ranging from silicon wafers to elastic membrane switches. Powder density (g/cm²) and surface area (cm/g) are the two critical characteristics of this product. The experiments involved three factors: reaction temperature, ammonium percentage, stirring rate. Each of these factors had two levels, and the design was replicated twice. The design is shown in Table 3. A222222222222233 Stir Rate (RPM) Ammonium (%) Table 3: Silver Powder Experiment from Exercise 13.23 Temperature (°C) Density Surface Area 100 8 14.68 0.40 100 8 15.18 0.43 30 100 8 15.12 0.42 30 100 17.48 0.41 150 7.54 0.69 150 8 6.66 0.67 30 150 8 12.46 0.52 30 150 8 12.62 0.36 100 40 10.95 0.58 100 40 17.68 0.43 30 100 40 12.65 0.57 30 100 40 15.96 0.54 150 40 8.03 0.68 150 40 8.84 0.75 30 150…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Statistics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Text book image
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...
Algebra
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Text book image
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...
Algebra
ISBN:9781680331141
Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
The Shape of Data: Distributions: Crash Course Statistics #7; Author: CrashCourse;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPFNxD3Yg6U;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Shape, Center, and Spread - Module 20.2 (Part 1); Author: Mrmathblog;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaid7O_Gag;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Shape, Center and Spread; Author: Emily Murdock;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YyW0DSCzpM;License: Standard Youtube License