
(a)
To obtain: The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds.
To find: The percent of the
(a)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 0.0255.
The percent of the
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The NHANES survey of 2009-2010 includes the weights of 548 females in the United States aged 20-29. The weights of females follow
Calculation:
For proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds:
The formula to find the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is,
Substitute 14 for ‘number of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds’ and 548 for ‘Total number of females’.
Thus, the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 0.0255.
For percent of the
Define the random variable x as weights of the females.
The formula for the standardized score is,
The females aged 20-29 weighted below 100 pounds is denoted as
Subtract the mean and then divide by the standard deviation to transform the value of x into standard normal z.
Where, standardized score
The percent of the
Use Table A: Standard normal cumulative proportions to find the area.
Procedure:
- Locate –1.2 in the left column of the A-2 Table.
- Obtain the value in the corresponding row below 0.06.
That is,
Thus, the percent of the
(b)
To obtain: The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds.
To find: The percent of the
(b)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 0.0602.
The percent of the
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The NHANES survey of 2009-2010 includes the weights of 548 females in the United States aged 20-29. From the data the number of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 33. The weights of females follow normal distribution with mean 161.58 pounds and standard deviation 48.96 pounds.
Calculation:
For proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds:
The formula to find the females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is,
Substitute 33 for ‘number of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds’ and 548 for ‘Total number of females’.
Thus, the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 0.0602.
For percent of the
The females aged 20-29 weighted above 250 pounds is denoted as
Subtract the mean and then divide by the standard deviation to transform the value of x into standard normal z.
Where, standardized score
The percent of the
Use Table A: Standard normal cumulative proportions to find the area to the left of 1.81.
Procedure:
- Locate 1.8 in the left column of the A-2 Table.
- Obtain the value in the corresponding row below 0.01.
That is,
The area to the right of 1.81 is,
Thus, the percent of the
(c)
To check: Whether it is a good idea to summarize the distribution of weights by an
(c)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The idea is not good to summarize the distribution of weights by a
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
The percentage of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 2.55% and the percentage of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 6.02%.
Using normal distribution, the percentage of
Thus, the results suggest that normal distribution not provides a good approximation to the distribution of weights.
Hence, the idea is not good to summarize the distribution of weights by a
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
EBK THE BASIC PRACTICE OF STATISTICS
- Please help me with the following statistic questionarrow_forwardTo evaluate the success of a 1-year experimental program designed to increase the mathematical achievement of underprivileged high school seniors, a random sample of participants in the program will be selected and their mathematics scores will be compared with the previous year’s statewide average of 525 for underprivileged seniors. The researchers want to determine whether the experimental program has increased the mean achievement level over the previous year’s statewide average. If alpha=.05, what sample size is needed to have a probability of Type II error of at most .025 if the actual mean is increased to 550? From previous results, sigma=80.arrow_forwardPlease help me answer the following questions from this problem.arrow_forward
- Please help me find the sample variance for this question.arrow_forwardCrumbs Cookies was interested in seeing if there was an association between cookie flavor and whether or not there was frosting. Given are the results of the last week's orders. Frosting No Frosting Total Sugar Cookie 50 Red Velvet 66 136 Chocolate Chip 58 Total 220 400 Which category has the greatest joint frequency? Chocolate chip cookies with frosting Sugar cookies with no frosting Chocolate chip cookies Cookies with frostingarrow_forwardThe table given shows the length, in feet, of dolphins at an aquarium. 7 15 10 18 18 15 9 22 Are there any outliers in the data? There is an outlier at 22 feet. There is an outlier at 7 feet. There are outliers at 7 and 22 feet. There are no outliers.arrow_forward
- Start by summarizing the key events in a clear and persuasive manner on the article Endrikat, J., Guenther, T. W., & Titus, R. (2020). Consequences of Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management Accounting Research?arrow_forwardThe table below was compiled for a middle school from the 2003 English/Language Arts PACT exam. Grade 6 7 8 Below Basic 60 62 76 Basic 87 134 140 Proficient 87 102 100 Advanced 42 24 21 Partition the likelihood ratio test statistic into 6 independent 1 df components. What conclusions can you draw from these components?arrow_forwardWhat is the value of the maximum likelihood estimate, θ, of θ based on these data? Justify your answer. What does the value of θ suggest about the value of θ for this biased die compared with the value of θ associated with a fair, unbiased, die?arrow_forward
- Show that L′(θ) = Cθ394(1 −2θ)604(395 −2000θ).arrow_forwarda) Let X and Y be independent random variables both with the same mean µ=0. Define a new random variable W = aX +bY, where a and b are constants. (i) Obtain an expression for E(W).arrow_forwardThe table below shows the estimated effects for a logistic regression model with squamous cell esophageal cancer (Y = 1, yes; Y = 0, no) as the response. Smoking status (S) equals 1 for at least one pack per day and 0 otherwise, alcohol consumption (A) equals the average number of alcohoic drinks consumed per day, and race (R) equals 1 for blacks and 0 for whites. Variable Effect (β) P-value Intercept -7.00 <0.01 Alcohol use 0.10 0.03 Smoking 1.20 <0.01 Race 0.30 0.02 Race × smoking 0.20 0.04 Write-out the prediction equation (i.e., the logistic regression model) when R = 0 and again when R = 1. Find the fitted Y S conditional odds ratio in each case. Next, write-out the logistic regression model when S = 0 and again when S = 1. Find the fitted Y R conditional odds ratio in each case.arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





