Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings. Scenario 1 The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

The prodave paint company earned a net profit margin of 20% on revenues of $20m this year. Fixed Capital Investment was $2 m and depreciation was $3 m. Working capital Investment equals 7.5% of the Sales level in that year. Net income, fixed Capital Investment, depreciation, interest expenses and sales are expected to grow at 10% per year for the next 5 years. After 5 years, the growth in sales , net income, depreciation and interest expenses will decline to a stable 5% per year and fixed Capital Investment and depreciation will offset each other. The tax rate is 40% and the prodave has 1 m shares of common stock outstanding and long term debt paying 12.5% interest trading at it's par value of $32 m. The WACC is 17% during the high growth stage and 15% during the stable growth stage. Required: a) Calculate FCFE b) Determine FCFF c) Estimate the value of Equity d) Calculate the value of the Firm

A key dynamic within any Multi-National Corporation (MNC) is cash and foreign exchange risk exposure. Cash management is critical and also heavily influenced by global dynamics, especially since COVID-19. Within the Caribbean and North American jurisdiction, the economic framework is tightly connected with the major Asian economies of China, the United Kingdom and Japan. The Caribbean and the North American economy have been a barometer of the global economic cycle.) For both Caribbean and North American economies, many Multi-National Corporations have made significant investments to reduce the production cost of goods and diversification benefits. Despite the benefits that could materialize, some North American countries have not been resilient through Global market shocks. Given this context, the following questions require research within the Caribbean context and current market dynamics since COVID-19. Your Manager has asked you to address the following concerns in the report 1)…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Answer 6

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Answer 7

Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

Answer 8

a

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Answer 9

a

Expert Solution

Answer 10

a

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000 × 0.5

Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Answer 13

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Answer 14

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

Answer 15

b

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $2,000,000

Total Assets, $215,000,000

Total revenue, $45,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $1,000,000

Total Assets, $107,500,000

Total revenue, $22,500,000

Answer 16

b

Expert Solution

Answer 17

b

Expert Solution

Answer 18

Expert Solution

Answer 19

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Answer 20

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Answer 21

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

Answer 22

c

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $25,000

Total Assets, $110,000,000

Total revenue, $350,000,000

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $12,500

Total Assets, $55,000,000

Total revenue, $175,000,000

Answer 23

c

Expert Solution

Answer 24

c

Expert Solution

Answer 25

Expert Solution

Answer 26

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

Determination of Materiality.

When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000 × 0.05

Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000 × 0.05

Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000 × 0.05

Determination of tolerable misstatement.

The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000 × 0.5

Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000 × 0.5

Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000 × 0.5

Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.

In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Answer 27

Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.1RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.2RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.3RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.4RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.5RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.6RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.7RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.8RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.9RQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.10RQ

Videos

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Explanation of Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Explanation of Solution

Answer to Problem 3.31P

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 3 Solutions