
Subpart (a):
Calculate the member of required labor.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
Number of workers required to produce one unit of goods can be calculated using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the required number of person to produce one unit of car in U.S.
Required labor to produce one unit of car in U.S. is 0.25.
Table 1 illustrates the workers required to produce a car and a ton of grain in the U.S. and the Japan that obtained by using Equation (1).
Table 1
Workers required to produce | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 0.25 workers | 0.10 workers |
Japan | 0.25 workers | 0.20 workers |
Concept introduction:
Subpart (b):
Draw the production possibility frontier.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 shows the productive capacity of two countries.
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of grains produced by both the countries and the vertical axis measures the quantity of cars produced. If either economy, that is, the U.S. or Japan devotes all of its 100 million workers in producing cars each economy can produce 400 million cars in a year
Concept introduction:
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF): PPF refers to the maximum possible combinations of output of goods or services that an economy can attain by efficiently utilizing and employing full resources.
Subpart (c):
Calculate the opportunity cost.
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
Opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is 2.5 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of a car for Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for Japan is 1.25 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is calculated as follows
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is 0.4 units of cars.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is 0.8 units of cars.
The results can be tabulated in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Opportunity Cost | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 2.5 tons of grains | 0.4 units of car |
Japan | 1.25 tons of grains | 0.8 units of car |
Concept introduction:
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of a foregone alternative, that is, the loss of other alternative when one alternative is chosen.
Subpart (d):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
Neither of these countries has an absolute advantage in producing cars. This is because they are equally productive in the production of a car (4 cars per worker per year). However, in the production of grains, the United States has an absolute advantage because it is more productive than Japan. The U.S. can produce 10 tons of grains per worker per year; whereas Japan can produce only 5 tons of grains per worker per year.
Concept introduction:
Absolute advantage: It is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.
Subpart (e):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (e):

Explanation of Solution
Japan has a
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (f):
Calculate the total production before the trade.
Subpart (f):

Explanation of Solution
Without trade and with half the workers in each country producing each of the goods, the United States would produce 200 million cars
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Subpart (g):
Gains from trade for the U.S. and Japan.
Subpart (g):

Explanation of Solution
Firstly, consider the situation without trade in which each country is producing some cars and some grains. Suppose the United States shifts its one worker from producing cars to producing grain, then that worker would produce 4 cars and 10 additional tons of grain. Now suppose, with trade, the United States offers to trade 7 tons of grain to Japan for 4 cars. The United States would encourage this because the cost of producing 4 cars in the United States is 10 tons of grain. So by trading, the United States can gain 4 cars for a cost of only 7 tons of grain. Hence, it is better off by 3 tons of grain.
The same is applicable for Japan, if Japan changes one worker from producing grain to producing cars. That worker would produce 4 more cars and 5 fewer tons of grain. Japan will take the trade because Japan will be better off by 2 tons of grain.
So with the trade and the change of one worker in both the United States and Japan, each country gets the same amount of cars as before but gets additional tons of grain (3 tons of grains for the United States and 2 tons of grains for Japan) making both countries better off.
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
PRICIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS
- No Al help please!! Please answer the following question for my economics paper: How technological skills and poverty are inversely related.arrow_forwardNot use aiarrow_forwardProblem 3 Stata Output Analysis Suppose a study investigates the causal effect of education on wages. Table 1 reports the results of an OLS regression of wages (wage per hour in dollars) on education (years in education). Table 1 Source SS df MS Number of obs = 3,017 F(1, 3015) = 298.39 Model Residual 18904467 191011981 1 18904467 3,015 63353.8909 Prob > F 0.0000 R-squared 0.0901 Adj R-squared 0.0898 Total 209916448 3,016 69600.9444 Root MSE 251.7 wage Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] education cons 29.56644 183.9342 1.711605 23.15976 17.27 0.000 7.94 0.000 26.21041 138.5237 32.92247 229.3447 a. How would you write this relationship using the Core Model? (5 points) b. What is the value for B₁, the coefficient on Education? (2 points) C. What is the standard error of ẞ₁? (2 points) d. What is the R squared for the model? (2 points) e. What is the t statistic for ₁at the 5% level of significance? (2 points) Λ f. What is the 95% confidence interval for B₁? (2 points) Λ g.…arrow_forward
- Problem 2 Hypothesis Testing Suppose you are interested in the effect of neighborhood crime incidents on high school graduation rates. You run the following regression model: Graduation; ßo+ß₁Crime; +ɛ¿ = You would like to test whether the neighborhood crime incidents have a statistically significant effect on high school graduation rate at the 5% level of significance (α = 0.05). You estimate the model and find that B₁ = -0.04 and se (B₁) = 0.008. a. Write down the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. (4 points) b. Calculate thet statistic of B₁. (5 points) C. What is the critical value of thet statistic for the 5% level of significance? (2 points) d. Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the coefficient on Crime? (6 points) e. Based on your answers to the questions b, c, and d, do you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis you defined in question a? Justify your answer. (5 points) Λ f. Isẞ₁ statistically significant at the 5% level? (3 points)arrow_forwardProblem 1 Endogeneity & Bias The ACT (an abbreviation of American College Testing) is a standardized test used for college admissions in the United States. Suppose you are interested in whether ACT preparation improves ACT scores. Consider the following model: ACT=B+B Preparation,+e; where Preparation measures the number of hours spent on ACT preparation and ACT is ACT scores. Each student is denoted by the subscript i. Suppose you estimate = - 21 andß₁ = 0.9. a. What is the dependent variable? What is the independent variable? (3 points) b. How do you interpret ẞ = 21 in this context? (4 points) 0 C. How do you interpretß₁ = 0.9 in this context? (4 points) 1 d. Describe a scenario which can cause the independent variable to be endogenous. (4 points)arrow_forwardHow does mining raw materials fir tech companies like apple affect the humar right violation all over the worldarrow_forward
- Consider the market for electricity. Suppose that a power plant dumps byproducts into a nearby river, creating a negative externality for those living downstream from the plant. Producing additional electricity imposes a constant per-unit external cost of $490. The following graph shows the demand (private value) curve and the supply (private cost) curve for electricity. Use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the social cost curve when the external cost is $490 per unit. PRICE (Dollars per unit of electricity) 1400 1260 1120 980 840 700 560 420 280 140 ° D 1 2 3 D Supply (Private Cost) Demand (Private Value) 5 6 7 QUANTITY (Units of electricity) Social Cost The market equilibrium quantity is units of electricity, but the socially optimal quantity of electricity production is units. To create an incentive for the firm to produce the socially optimal quantity of electricity, the government could impose a unit of electricity. perarrow_forwardHow do mining of raw materials for a tech industry affects the human rights in the worldarrow_forwardAssume the Federal Interstate Commission began the fiscal year with the following account balances: FEDERAL INTERSTATE COMMISSION Trial BalanceOctober 1, 2020 Debits Credits Fund Balance with Treasury$810,000 Supplies 107,000 Equipment 1, 370,000 Accumulated Depreciation $484,000 Accounts Payable 130,000 Wages Payable 85,000Cumulative Results of Operations 1,588,000 $2,287,000 $2,287,000 Congress passed a spending bill providing $17,200, 000 to fund the agency's operations for the year. During the first quarter the commission processed the following items for payment (all items were paid by Treasury in the first quarter). Accounts payable$130,000 Wages payable 85,000 Salaries and benefits 507,000 Supplies 524,000 Contracted services 2,200,000 Grants 1,020,000 Equipment 620,000 Total$5,086,000 Unpaid wages at the end of the quarter totaled $37,000. In addition to the items paid in item 2, the commission received supplies of $24,000 and contracted services of $82,000 that are to be…arrow_forward
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





