
Subpart (a):
Calculate the member of required labor.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
Number of workers required to produce one unit of goods can be calculated using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the required number of person to produce one unit of car in U.S.
Required labor to produce one unit of car in U.S. is 0.25.
Table 1 illustrates the workers required to produce a car and a ton of grain in the U.S. and the Japan that obtained by using Equation (1).
Table 1
Workers required to produce | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 0.25 workers | 0.10 workers |
Japan | 0.25 workers | 0.20 workers |
Concept introduction:
Subpart (b):
Draw the production possibility frontier.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 shows the productive capacity of two countries.
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of grains produced by both the countries and the vertical axis measures the quantity of cars produced. If either economy, that is, the U.S. or Japan devotes all of its 100 million workers in producing cars each economy can produce 400 million cars in a year
Concept introduction:
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF): PPF refers to the maximum possible combinations of output of goods or services that an economy can attain by efficiently utilizing and employing full resources.
Subpart (c):
Calculate the opportunity cost.
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
Opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is 2.5 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of a car for Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for Japan is 1.25 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is calculated as follows
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is 0.4 units of cars.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is 0.8 units of cars.
The results can be tabulated in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Opportunity Cost | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 2.5 tons of grains | 0.4 units of car |
Japan | 1.25 tons of grains | 0.8 units of car |
Concept introduction:
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of a foregone alternative, that is, the loss of other alternative when one alternative is chosen.
Subpart (d):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
Neither of these countries has an absolute advantage in producing cars. This is because they are equally productive in the production of a car (4 cars per worker per year). However, in the production of grains, the United States has an absolute advantage because it is more productive than Japan. The U.S. can produce 10 tons of grains per worker per year; whereas Japan can produce only 5 tons of grains per worker per year.
Concept introduction:
Absolute advantage: It is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.
Subpart (e):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (e):

Explanation of Solution
Japan has a
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (f):
Calculate the total production before the trade.
Subpart (f):

Explanation of Solution
Without trade and with half the workers in each country producing each of the goods, the United States would produce 200 million cars
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Subpart (g):
Gains from trade for the U.S. and Japan.
Subpart (g):

Explanation of Solution
Firstly, consider the situation without trade in which each country is producing some cars and some grains. Suppose the United States shifts its one worker from producing cars to producing grain, then that worker would produce 4 cars and 10 additional tons of grain. Now suppose, with trade, the United States offers to trade 7 tons of grain to Japan for 4 cars. The United States would encourage this because the cost of producing 4 cars in the United States is 10 tons of grain. So by trading, the United States can gain 4 cars for a cost of only 7 tons of grain. Hence, it is better off by 3 tons of grain.
The same is applicable for Japan, if Japan changes one worker from producing grain to producing cars. That worker would produce 4 more cars and 5 fewer tons of grain. Japan will take the trade because Japan will be better off by 2 tons of grain.
So with the trade and the change of one worker in both the United States and Japan, each country gets the same amount of cars as before but gets additional tons of grain (3 tons of grains for the United States and 2 tons of grains for Japan) making both countries better off.
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Explain poverty experienced in a friend or family.arrow_forwardExplain how much of emotional, mental and physical toll makes it so difficult to break the cycle of poverty.arrow_forwardCase Study: The Impact of Ebola on Tax Revenue in the DRC Background: The Democratic Republic of the Congo has experienced mulitiple outbreaks, with the 2018-2020 outbreak being one of the most severe. The outbreak had profound effects on public health, the economy and government operations. The DRC's economy already fragile due to policital instability and conflict, faced additional stain as the Ebola virus spread across several provinces. Economic disruption: The Ebola outbreak led to significant disruptions in the affected regions. Businesses were forced to close or reduce operations due to quarantine measures and the fear of contagion. this resulted in a sharp decline in economic activities, particularly in sectors such as agriculute, mining and trade. reduced consumer spending and interruptions in supply chains further exacerbated the economic downturn. Impact on Tax Revenue: the economic…arrow_forward
- Key shortcomings of the Human Capital approach to measuring the monetary value of benefits of new treatments are that it Will generate lower benefits for male lives on average Will generate higher benefits for female lives on average Will tend to OVERVALUE improvements in quality of life Will tend to UNDERVALUE improved survival for people out of labour forcearrow_forwardOne of the key concepts in economics that underpins the necessity of making tough choices and confronting difficult tradeoffs through some form of collective decision-making is called Production Consumption Exchange Equity Scarcityarrow_forwardAllocative efficiency WITHIN the health care sector refers to What mix of nonmedical and medical goods and services should be produced in the macro-economy What mix of medical goods and services should be produced in the health economy What specific health care resources should be used to produce the chosen medical goods and services Who should receive the medical goods and services that are producedarrow_forward
- Production efficiency is most concerned with Choice of inputs in production process Quantity of outputs resulting from the production process The technological process of production All of the abovearrow_forwardChoose all of the following that are assumed to be constant while constructing the production possibilities curve Technology Precise mix of inputs Institutional arrangements like judicial protection of business contracts Outputsarrow_forwardA point that lies OUTSIDE of the PPC can be achieved if A major technological innovation increases production efficiency A sudden influx of resources e.g., massive immigration of trained nurses Economic reform resulting in greater protection of intellectual property rights All of the above Only options 1 and 2arrow_forward
- The marginal benefit from each successive unit of medical care consumed declines BECAUSE each successive unit is more expensive to produce True Falsearrow_forwardIn the Human Capital approach, estimated monetary worth of life is MOST SENSITIVE to which key indicator Discount rate Social security payroll taxes Labour market earnings Workplace injury compensationarrow_forwardOver the last few decades out-of-pocket costs have formed a DECLINING proportion of total consumer expenditure on medical care True Falsearrow_forward
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





