
Concept explainers
a.
Calculate
a.

Explanation of Solution
Calculate NPV of salary received by Mrs. X.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax | $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 | |
Less: Tax cost | $(20,000) | $(32,000) | $(32,000) | |
After-tax cash flow | $60,000 | $48,000 | $48,000 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | $60,000 | $44,448 | $41,136 | $145,584 |
Working note:
Calculate tax cost.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax income | $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax cost | $20,000 | $32,000 | $32,000 |
Hence, the NPV of salary received by Mrs. X is $145,584.
Calculate NPV of salary cost to Firm B.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax cash flow | -$80,000 | -$80,000 | -$80,000 | |
Add: Tax savings | $27,200 | $27,200 | $27,200 | |
After-tax cash flow | -$52,800 | -$52,800 | -$52,800 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | -$52,800 | -$48,893 | -$45,250 | -$146,943 |
Working note:
Calculate tax savings.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax deduction | -$80,000 | -$80,000 | -$80,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax savings | -$27,200 | -$27,200 | -$27,200 |
Hence, the NPV of salary cost to Firm B is -$146,943.
b.
Calculate net present value (NPV) of salary received by Mrs. X and NPV of salary cost to Firm B.
b.

Explanation of Solution
Calculate NPV of salary received by Mrs. X.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax cash flow | $140,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 | |
Less: Tax cost | $(35,000) | $(20,000) | $(20,000) | |
After-tax cash flow | $105,000 | $30,000 | $30,000 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | $105,000 | $27,780 | $25,710 | $158,490 |
Working note:
Calculate tax cost.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax income | $140,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax cost | $35,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 |
The NPV of salary received by Mrs. X is $158,490.
Calculate NPV of salary cost to Firm B.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax cash flow | -$140,000 | -$50,000 | -$50,000 | |
Add: Tax savings | $47,600 | $17,000 | $17,000 | |
After-tax cash flow | -$92,400 | -$33,000 | -$33,000 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | -$92,400 | -$30,558 | -$28,281 | -$151,239 |
Working note:
Calculate tax savings.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax deduction | -$140,000 | -$50,000 | -$50,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax savings | -$47,600 | -$17,000 | -$17,000 |
c.
Calculate net present value (NPV) of cost to Firm B under the proposal and state whether the proposal is superior to its original offer.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Calculate NPV of cost to Firm B under the proposal.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax cash flow | -$140,000 | -$45,000 | -$45,000 | |
Add: Tax savings | $47,600 | $15,300 | $15,300 | |
After-tax cash flow | -$92,400 | -$29,700 | -$29,700 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | -$92,400 | -$27,502 | -$25,453 | -$145,355 |
Working note:
Calculate tax savings.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax deduction | -$140,000 | -$45,000 | -$45,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax savings | -$47,600 | -$15,300 | -$15,300 |
Hence, NPV of cost to Firm B under the proposal is -$145,355.
Comment: The proposal is superior to its original offer as the NVP of salary cost of the proposal (-$145,355) is lower than the NVP of salary cost of the original offer (-$146,943).
d.
State whether Mrs. X should accept the original offer or the counterproposal by calculating net present value (NPV) of salary received.
d.

Explanation of Solution
Calculate NPV of salary received by Mrs. X.
Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | NPV | |
Before-tax cash flow | $140,000 | $45,000 | $45,000 | |
Less: Tax cost | $(35,000) | $(18,000) | $(18,000) | |
After-tax cash flow | $105,000 | $27,000 | $27,000 | |
Multiply: Discount factor at 8% | - | |||
Present value | $105,000 | $25,002 | $23,139 | $153,141 |
Working note:
Calculate tax cost.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
Before-tax income | $140,000 | $45,000 | $45,000 |
Multiply: Marginal tax rate | |||
Tax cost | $35,000 | $18,000 | $18,000 |
Comment: Mrs. X should accept the counterproposal as the NPV of salary received of the proposal ($153,141) is higher than the NVP of salary received of the original offer ($145,584).
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
- account questionsarrow_forwardcompared to the individual risks of constituting assets. Question 5 (6 marks) The common shares of Almond Beach Inc, have a beta of 0.75, offer a return of 9%, and have an historical standard deviation of return of 17%. Alternatively, the common shares of Palm Beach Inc. have a beta of 1.25, offer a return of 10%, and have an historical standard deviation of return of 13%. Both firms have a marginal tax rate of 37%. The risk-free rate of return is 3% and the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 9½%. 1. Which company would a well-diversified investor prefer to invest in? Explain why and show all calculations. 2. Which company Would an investor who can invest in the shares of only one firm prefer to invest in? Explain why. RELEASED BY THE CI, MGMT2023, MARCH 2, 2025 5 Use the following template to organize and present your results: Theoretical CAPM Actual offered prediction for expected return (%) return (%) Standard deviation of return (%) Beta Almond Beach Inc. Palm Beach…arrow_forwardprovide correct answerarrow_forward
- Please solve. The screen print is kind of split. Please look carefully.arrow_forwardCoronado Fire, Inc. manufactures steel cylinders and nozzles for two models of fire extinguishers: (1) a home fire extinguisher and (2) a commercial fire extinguisher. The home model is a high-volume (54,000 units), half-gallon cylinder that holds 2 1/2 pounds of multi- purpose dry chemical at 480 PSI. The commercial model is a low-volume (10,200 units), two-gallon cylinder that holds 10 pounds of multi-purpose dry chemical at 390 PSI. Both products require 1.5 hours of direct labor for completion. Therefore, total annual direct labor hours are 96,300 or [1.5 hours x (54,000+10,200)]. Estimated annual manufacturing overhead is $1,566,090. Thus, the predetermined overhead rate is $16.26 or ($1,566,090 ÷ 96,300) per direct labor hour. The direct materials cost per unit is $18.50 for the home model and $26.50 for the commercial model. The direct labor cost is $19 per unit for both the home and the commercial models. The company's managers identified six activity cost pools and related…arrow_forwardCoronado Fire, Inc. manufactures steel cylinders and nozzles for two models of fire extinguishers: (1) a home fire extinguisher and (2) a commercial fire extinguisher. The home model is a high-volume (54,000 units), half-gallon cylinder that holds 2 1/2 pounds of multi- purpose dry chemical at 480 PSI. The commercial model is a low-volume (10,200 units), two-gallon cylinder that holds 10 pounds of multi-purpose dry chemical at 390 PSI. Both products require 1.5 hours of direct labor for completion. Therefore, total annual direct labor hours are 96,300 or [1.5 hours x (54,000+ 10,200)]. Estimated annual manufacturing overhead is $1,566,090. Thus, the predetermined overhead rate is $16.26 or ($1,566,090 ÷ 96,300) per direct labor hour. The direct materials cost per unit is $18.50 for the home model and $26.50 for the commercial model. The direct labor cost is $19 per unit for both the home and the commercial models. The company's managers identified six activity cost pools and related…arrow_forward
- The completed Payroll Register for the February and March biweekly pay periods is provided, assuming benefits went into effect as anticipated. Required: Using the payroll registers, complete the General Journal entries as follows: February 10 Journalize the employee pay. February 10 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the February 10 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employees will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base. February 14 Issue the employee pay. February 24 Journalize the employee pay. February 24 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the February 24 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employee will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base. February 28 Issue the employee pay. February 28 Issue payment for the payroll liabilities. March 10 Journalize the employee pay. March 10 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the March 10 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employees will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base.…arrow_forwardPlease given step by step explanation general accounting questionarrow_forwardDon't use ai solution please given answer general accountingarrow_forward
- Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
