To determine:
Using Hofstede's data for Mexico and the United States determine how employees of both these countries might react
a. to a team based rewards program
b. would view their relationship with their boss
c. might react to change in the work process
Introduction:
Greet Hofstede had conducted a study into the differences that existed in the cultural environment. This massive research was conducted way back in the 1970s and 1980s wherein the 116,000 employees of IBM across 40 countries were surveyed. Their values related to work were studied and it was found that the employees of IBM and the managers of the company varied on five specific dimensions of national culture. These dimensions can be studied in the table given below
Source: Based on G. Hofstede, "Motivation, leadership, and Organisation: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?

Answer to Problem 1TAI
Solution:
Source: Based on G. Hofstede, "Motivation, leadership, and Organisation: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?
Explanation of Solution
a. to a team based rewards program
The United States has a high individual score of 91 which reveals that Americans are individualists and would not react with enthusiasm to a team based rewards program. There is a concept of individualism in the U.S and the relation the employees share with their team and organization is usually calculative and based on self-interest. Mexico, on the other hand, has a low individual score of 30 is considered to be a society which believes in collectivism. Therefore, the employees in Mexico would react with enthusiasm to a team based rewards program. The employees in Mexico being high on collectivism believe in strong relationships where each employee of the team takes responsibility for their fellow team members.
b. would review their relationship with their boss
The United States has a low power distance score of 40, which means that power distribution in the U.S is relatively equal and employees will review their relationship with their boss a one where the subordinates are treated with equality. Mexico on the other has a high power distance score of 81 which means that employees in Mexico will review their relationship with their boss as that of a superior and subordinate. A high power distance score means power is distributed unequally in the organizations. Mexico has an organizational culture where the boss tells the subordinates what needs to be done and the organizations have a hierarchical structure.
c. Might react to change in the work process
The U.S has a low uncertainty avoidance score and it means that employees in the United States are open to innovation, new ideas and have the willingness to try out new changes. Therefore, they are likely to react positively to any change in the work process. Mexico, on the other hand, has a high uncertainty avoidance score and prefer avoiding any kind of uncertainty. The employees in Mexico will therefore not react positively to changes to the work process. The employees in Mexico prefer rules and have a tendency to resist innovation or change.
Therefore, the above discussion brings forth how employees in U.S and Mexico will react to three different kinds of situations.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
FUNDAMENTALS OF MANAGEMENT
- Hi! Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the article by Costas Paris, Jack Pitcher & James T. Areddy from Wall Street Journal called BlackRock Strikes Deal to Control Two Panama Ports Please offer authentic insights on how this article connects with global supply chain management.arrow_forwardCan you guys help me on this? Thank you! Here's the authentic insight my classmate wrote about the article they chose here. Please give a little comment about this post. Thank you!arrow_forwarddiscuss team development stages,give citations and referencearrow_forward
- Patel sat down with the head of public relations, the CEO, and a few Board members to weigh options. On the one hand, they knew there had already been problems along their pipeline causing health concerns a few months before. Apparently, there were substandard materials used in some of the pipeline sections that eroded which they had addressed quickly as soon as they knew there was an issue. This information was public and is one of the reasons why the media was jumping on the story. On the other hand, their pipeline was not the only one in the area. At least two other pipelines moved materials that were dangerous if released in the environment. Was the problem HFC's or another company's or maybe both or ALL? At the present moment until hazard investigation crews could investigate on- site at all the pipelines, there were more questions than answers. Patel had the accident investigation team dispatched to the area. He was debating whether he should call the other companies to jointly…arrow_forwardPlease original work what is the most important learning and new understanding gained regarding balanced scorecards. what you might do differently in your current company (Consulting Management Firm) How you would use a balanced scorecard if you were the CEO of an organization. Include the likelihood that you would use a balanced scorecard based on what you’ve learned. Please cite in text references and add weblinksarrow_forwardWhat is the definition of the anthropomorphisms, could you please give the examples? Please help explain the hypothetical case study or a proposal for the circuit City? What is the X LSS tools to collect Y data to understand Z processes, could you please give the example? What is the attribution of human traits, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities on the collapsed of Circuit City and out of business?arrow_forward
- Background information: A manager needs to know what kind of information they need, where to get it from and how to apply it to the specific task at hand in order to successfully manage the strategic planning and use of technology efforts in their organization. In your role as Director of Innovation and Business Opportunities you are charged with developing the specifications for a knowledge-management system that will help direct your organization’s future acquisitions of technology. What do you need to know to accomplish your work? Where did you get the knowledge on how to do these things? What information or data do you need to accomplish your work? Where do you look for this data? How easy is it to find the information or data you need? What would make it easier? What information do you feel would make your work easier if you had it? Please cite in text references and weblinksarrow_forwardPlease help explain the hypothetical case study or a proposal for the circuit City? Could you please help explain protocol, methodology, data collection in the case of Circuit city? How DMAIC can be used in the case study related to the fallen of Circuit City What is the relationship between DMAIC in the Biblical integration, How do they apply it?arrow_forwardConduct a SWOT analysis for United Parcel Service (UPS) for a Leadership Recommendation Project (LPR) including a brief narrative explaining the rationale each category of (S.W.O.T.) and their conclusions from the analysis?arrow_forward
- Please original work Talk about what “influencing” means in regard to the balanced scorecard development process. Provide a brief example of how you would “influence” all employees in the balanced scorecard development process. What are the benefits of a cascading balanced scorecard? What are the potential critical flaws in business meetings and how can a leader steer meeting so that they maximize their effectiveness by using a balanced scorecard? What are at least 3 critical questions to ask in a balanced scorecard employee survey? How would you use a balanced scorecard employee survey to update the core elements of the scorecard? Describe 3 balanced scorecard issues that might prevent an organization from successfully implementing a balanced scorecard. How might an organization overcome such issues? Please cite in text references and add weblinksarrow_forwardAt the end of 2014, a large university hospital in the Netherlands launched a procurement tender exercise for surgical suture material. The rationale for hospital management to initiate this procedure was cost-cutting and standardization. The award criteria were focussed on the most economically advantageous tender. There were different suppliers on the market that were able to produce and deliver high-quality surgical suture material for a lower price than was currently being paid. Consequently, the tender was awarded to a new supplier.The top managers and purchasing manager who initiated the tender trod carefully and implemented this relatively small-scale change initiative according to some basic change management principles (e.g. Kotter, 2012): they built a guiding coalition that incorporated renowned medical specialists, they consulted department heads and they communicated the change to surgeons through different channels. Furthermore, it was recorded in the tender that the new…arrow_forwardLance Best, the CEO of Barker Sports Apparel, was meeting with Nina Kelk, the company’sgeneral counsel, who also oversaw human resources. It had been a long day at the company’sBirmingham, England, headquarters, and in the early evening the two were going over theevaluations of each of Lance’s direct reports. Lance was struck by what he saw in CFO DamonEwen’s file. Most of the input was neutral, which was to be expected. Though brilliant and wellrespected, Damon wasn’t the warmest of colleagues. But one person had given him the lowestratings possible, and from the written remarks, Lance could tell that it was Ahmed Lund, Barker’shead of sales. One read: “I’ve never worked with a bigger control freak in my life.”“These comments are pretty vicious,” Lance said.“You’re surprised?” Nina asked.“I guess not,” Lance acknowledged.His CFO and his sales chief had been at loggerheads for a while. Ahmed’s 360 also contained afew pointed complaints about his working style1—no doubt from Damon.Lance…arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON





