The
Explanation of Solution
If the market in kidneys were legal, then the demand and supply curves look like the ones shown in the diagram.
The demand and supply for the kidney are relatively inelastic because this is the organ that a person needs in emergency situations despite its high cost. The demand for human organs is inelastic in nature.
If the market of kidneys is legal, then the person who needs the kidney would get them despite fluctuating prices.
The demand and supply mechanism keeps the market for the kidney in equilibrium.
If the law that prohibits the sale of kidneys exists in a market, the demand for kidneys will still remain the same. But since the supply is restricted, now a person can only donate the organ instead of selling them.
Suppose in the presence of a law that prohibits the selling of organs, X quantity of kidney is donated by peoples.
Since selling is prohibited, the supply curve is a vertical line parallel to the y-axis because supply is limited and cannot increase according to the market demand.
This explanation is shown in the graph, where the x-axis represents the quantity of the kidney and the y-axis represents the
The ban or prohibition on the sale of human organs promotes barter exchange, other illegal activities and the black market in organ transfers.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Apply the concept of equilibrium in the health market or medicine practicearrow_forwardHow does the pricing of "free" health care in Canada affect the quantity consumed?arrow_forwardIf you could create the best transplant system for a country, what regulations would you create to manage the cost and benefits of transplants? answer in three paragrapharrow_forward
- What would happen if, in order to provide lower cost health care, the government decided to set a price ceiling (Pmax) in the health insurance market? (Please answer questions a, b, and c below.) What is the effect of this maximum price legislation on the market for health insurance? Briefly explain the situation for both consumers and producers (i.e. health care providers). What might the government do to achieve their intended aims (i.e. lower costs and increased quantity)?arrow_forwardWhat is the relationship between health and health economics?arrow_forwardSuppose the government imposes a system of price ceilings in the health care industry as part of an overall health care reform bill. a) draw a graph of the health care market and show equilibrium price and quantity. b) assume the government imposes an effective price ceiling in the health care market. Show the price ceiling in your graph. Indicate what will happen to quantity demanded and quantity supplied of health over time ? c) would a shortage or surplus result ? I llustrate in your graph.arrow_forward
- Discuss the kind of pressure the Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) exerted on the price of drugs.arrow_forwardWhat would be the effects on price and quantity if physicians can induce demand?arrow_forwardThe demand curve for kidneys is downward sloping and the supply curve of kidneys is upward sloping. If it is unlawful to pay someone for a kidney, fewer kidneys will be forthcoming. In other words, the quantity supplied of kidneys is less at $0 than at, say, 20,000.Fewer kidneys supplied mean fewer kidney. Would there be fewer kidney transplants if the supply curve of kidneys is vertical?arrow_forward
- Assume that the government decides to subsidize the price of healthcare. The subsidy will be given directly to individual consumers of medical-related goods and services. Who is likely to benefit more from this subsidy: Providers (doctors, nurses, hospital staff, etc....) or Patients? Explain your answer using a supply and demand diagram.arrow_forwardWhy does taking a drug off a formulary increase the prices to the consumer?arrow_forwardEconomists in Champaign have been studying the local market for pizza. The market is described in the graph: Market for Pizza 10.3 10 9. 8 7 6.1 6 5.7 5 4.65 4.1 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 (2.1] 2 500 518 464 479 Quantity 401 430 545 577 Some research by the local university shows that eating pizza improves health in several ways. The local government decides to subsidize pizza consumption by paying $1.6 of every pizza sold(essentially a negative tax of $1.6). How much will the government spend with the subsidy? Pricearrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning