Concept explainers
(a)
The speed of Earth in its orbit by using the data in appendix 1, if the Earth’s orbit is assumed to be circular.
(a)
Answer to Problem 26Q
Solution:
Explanation of Solution
Given data:
From appendix 1, the radius of the Earth’s orbit is
Formula used:
Write the expression for speed.
Here,
Explanation:
Since it is given that Earth’s orbit is to be assumed to be circular, the distance covered by the Earth in a revolution is equal to the perimeter of the circle.
Recall the expression for speed.
Substitute
Here, is the radius of Earth’s orbit.
Substitute
Conclusion:
Hence, the speed of Earth in its orbit calculated by using the data from appendix 1 is close to
(b)
The wavelength (in meters) of the signal received by the Earth if the aliens are transmitting it at a frequency of
(b)
Answer to Problem 26Q
Solution:
Explanation of Solution
Given data:
The frequency of the signal is
Formula used:
Write the expression for the wavelength of a wave.
Here,
Explanation:
Consider the speed of light to be
As the Earth is neither moving toward nor away from the alien’s planet, so there is no relative motion between the planets. Therefore, there would be no Doppler effect.
Recall the expression for the wavelength of a wave.
Substitute
Conclusion:
Thus, the wavelength of the signal received by Earth from the aliens under the given condition is calculated to be
(c)
The maximum wavelength shift in meters as well as in percentage of unshifted wavelength, calculated in part (b), if the maximum Doppler shift occurs when moving directly toward or away from the alien planet.
(c)
Answer to Problem 26Q
Solution:
Explanation of Solution
Given data:
The frequency of the signal is
Formula used:
Write the expression for the Doppler shift if the receiver is directly approaching the transmitter.
Here,
Explanation:
Since the Earth (receiver) is moving directly toward the alien planet (transmitter), there is a relative motion between them. Therefore, a Doppler shift would be observed.
Recall the value of the wavelength of the signal received by the Earth from the aliens as calculated in part (b).
Recall the value of Earth’s speed in its orbit under the given condition form part (a).
Consider the speed of light to be
Recall the expression for the Doppler shift if the receiver is directly approaching toward the transmitter.
Rearrange the expression in terms of
Substitute
The maximum wavelength shift in percentage of unshifted wavelength is given by the expression:
Here,
Substitute
Conclusion:
The maximum wavelength shifts in meters as well as in percentage of unshifted wavelength is calculated as
(d)
The reason behind the utmost importance given to the precision of the SETI radio receiver to measure frequency and wavelength.
(d)
Answer to Problem 26Q
Solution:
The Doppler shift calculated is very small
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
Doppler Effect is defined as the phenomenon in which there is a sudden noticeable change in the pitch or wavelength when there is a relative motion between the transmitter and the receiver.
The expression for the Doppler shift if the receiver is directly approaching the transmitter is:
Here,
Explanation:
Recall the value of the maximum wavelength shift in meters, calculated in the previous part, that is, part (c).
Also recall the value of the maximum wavelength shift in percentage of unshifted wavelength.
It can be clearly observed from these two values that the wavelength of the receiving signal is very less. Therefore, to identify the Doppler shift, the SETI radio receiver must be highly precise. If the receiver is not precise and accurate, it would not detect such a small magnitude change and the signal from the alien planet would not be verified.
Conclusion:
The SETI radio receiver must be very precise to detect the very small shift in the wavelength due to Doppler effect.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 27 Solutions
Universe
- In a globular cluster, astronomers (someday) discover a star with the same mass as our Sun, but consisting entirely of hydrogen and helium. Is this star a good place to point our SETI antennas and search for radio signals from an advanced civilization? Group of answer choices No, because such a star (and any planets around it) would not have the heavier elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, etc.) that we believe are necessary to start life as we know it. Yes, because globular clusters are among the closest star clusters to us, so that they would be easy to search for radio signals. Yes, because we have already found radio signals from another civilization living near a star in a globular cluster. No, because such a star would most likely not have a stable (main-sequence) stage that is long enough for a technological civilization to develop. Yes, because such a star is probably old and a technological civilization will have had a long time to evolve and develop there.arrow_forwardSince 1995, hundreds of extrasolar planets have been discovered. There is the exciting possibility that there is life on one or more of these planets. To support life similar to that on the Earth, the planet must have liquid water. For an Earth-like planet orbiting a star like the Sun, this requirement means that the planet must be within a habitable zone of 0.9 AU to 1.4 AU from the star. The semimajor axis of an extrasolar planet is inferred from its period. What range in periods corresponds to the habitable zone for an Earth-like Planet orbiting a Sun-like star?arrow_forwardWhen Mars is 90 million km (9 x 10^10 m) from Earth, a) How long would it take for a radio wave from a video camera mounted on the back of a Mars Rover to tell ground control on earth that the Rover is about to go over a cliff? b) How long would it take for a radio signal from Earth to reach the Rover saying "STOP". c) Why do our Mars Rovers have to be "intelligent" enough to figure out how to deal with obstacles themselves?arrow_forward
- asap pleasearrow_forwardFor which of the following reasons (select all that apply), is it useful/important to send rovers to other planetary bodies in our solar system? O a. The engineering innovations developed to produce successful/viable rovers and landers on other planets can help lead to developments in the technology used here on Earth that may have taken far more time to develop without the limitations provided by space travel to foreign worlds. O b. The data collected can help improve our understanding of the evolution/development of our solar system. O. Rovers/landers can be outfitted with various tools and equipment that can be used to inform of us of the geological histories of each of the planets they visit. O d. More direct probes of the planetary surface are possible to detect signs of the building blocks of life. O e. Rock samples can be used to calibrate our estimations of the age of the solar system.arrow_forwardWe think the terrestrial planets formed around solid “seeds” that later grew over time through the accretion of rocks and metals. a) Suppose the Earth grew to its present size in 1 million years through the accretion of particles averaging 100 grams each. On average, how many particles did the Earth capture per second, given that the mass of the Earth is = 5.972 × 10 ^24 kg ? b) If you stood on Earth during its formation and watched a region covering 100 m^2, how many impacts would you expect to see in one hour. Use the impact rate you calculated in part a. You’ll need the following as well: the radius of the Earth is = 6.371 × 10 ^6 m and the surface area of the Earth is 4??^2Eartharrow_forward
- You decide to go on an interstellar mission to explore some of the newly discovered extrasolar planets orbiting the star ROTOR. Your spacecraft arrives in the new system, in which there are five planets. ROTOR is identical to the Sun (in terms of its size, mass, age and composition). From your observations of these planets, you collect the following data: Density Average Distance from star (AU] Planet Mass Radius Albedo Temp. [C] Surf. Press. MOI Rotation [Earth = 1] (Earth = 1] [g/cm³] [Atm.] Period (Hours] Factor SIEVER EUGENIA 4.0 0.001 2.0 0.1 5.0 1.0 0.3 20 0.8 N/A 3.0 0.2 N/A 0.3 0.4 0.35 20 10 500 1000 5.0 4.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.7 -50 MARLENE CRILE 1.0 1.0 3.0 8.0 1,5 0.0 0.50 0.50 0.25 150 0.4 JANUS 100 12 0.1 10 -80 0.2 200 Figure 1: А Rotor 850 890 900 Wavelength (nm) A Sun В C 860 900 910 Wavelength (nm) 2414 a asarrow_forwardPlease help me with this question. A=.2arrow_forwardCalculate how long radio communications from the spacecraft will take when it encounters Mars. The furthest distance from Earth to Mars is 2.66 AU. Remember that 1 AU = 1.5 x 1011 m and that light travels at 3 x 108 m/s. So how long will the radio messages take to travel this greatest distance of 2.66 AU? If two way communication between the Earth and the spacecraft involve a 1 s time lapse before an acknowledging signal is sent by the spacecraft, how long a time is there between sending a command to the spacecraft and receiving a reply?arrow_forward
- Tutorial A radio broadcast left Earth in 1923. How far in light years has it traveled? If there is, on average, 1 star system per 400 cubic light years, how many star systems has this broadcast reached? Assume that the fraction of these star systems that have planets is 0.50 and that, in a given planetary system, the average number of planets that have orbited in the habitable zone for 4 billion years is 0.40. How many possible planets with life could have heard this signal? Part 1 of 3 To figure out how many light years a signal has traveled we need to know how long since the signal left Earth. If the signal left in 1923, distance in light years = time since broadcast left Earth. d = tnow - broadcast d = 97 97 light years Part 2 of 3 Since the radio signal travels in all directions, it expanded as a sphere with a radius equal to the distance it has traveled so far. To determine the number of star systems this signal has reached, we need to determine the volume of that sphere. V, = Vb…arrow_forwardTutorial A radio broadcast left Earth in 1925. How far in light years has it traveled? If there is, on average, 1 star system per 400 cubic light years, how many star systems has this broadcast reached? Assume that the fraction of these star systems that have planets is 0.30 and that, in a given planetary system, the average number of planets that have orbited in the habitable zone for 4 billion years is 0.85. How many possible planets with life could have heard this signal? Part 1 of 3 To figure out how many light years a signal has traveled we need to know how long since the signal left Earth. If the signal left in 1925, distance in light years = time since broadcast left Earth. d = tnow - tbroadcast d = light years Submit Skip (you cannot come back)arrow_forwardIf you detected radio signals with an average wavelength of 68 cm and suspected that they came from a civilization on a distant Earth-like exoplanet, roughly how much of a change in wavelength (in cm) should you expect to detect as a result of the orbital motion of the distant exoplanet? (Hint: Use the Doppler shift formula.) (Note: Earth's orbital velocity is 30 km/s.)arrow_forward
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningAstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStaxFoundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning