Bundle: Economics: Private And Public Choice, Loose-leaf Version, 16th + Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
Bundle: Economics: Private And Public Choice, Loose-leaf Version, 16th + Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
16th Edition
ISBN: 9781337956666
Author: James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 27, Problem 13CQ
To determine

Check whether buying of a refrigerator is profitable or not.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The market value of a product is determined by its present value. With the given information, the buying price (P) of a refrigerator is $700, the salvage value (SV) is $200, rate of interest is 8 per cent, and reduction in the electricity bill (ED) is $150. Assume that the electricity bill is $350. After deducting the ED, electricity bill is $200(350150). The present worth (PV) of using the owner’s refrigerator can be calculated as follows:

PV=EB1(1+i)1EB2(1+i)2...EBn(1+i)n=350(1+0.08)1350(1+0.08)2350(1+0.08)3350(1+0.08)4350(1+0.08)5=350(1.08)1350(1.08)2350(1.08)3350(1.08)4350(1.08)5=3501.083501.16643501.25973501.36053501.4693=324.07300.07277.84257.26238.21=1,397.45

The PV of using the owner’s refrigerator is -$1,397.45.

The present worth (PV) of buying a new refrigerator can be calculated as follows:

PV=PEB1(1+i)1EB2(1+i)2...EBn(1+i)n+SVn(1+i)n=700200(1+0.08)1200(1+0.08)2200(1+0.08)3200(1+0.08)4200(1+0.08)5+200(1+0.08)5=700200(1.08)1200(1.08)2200(1.08)3200(1.08)4200(1.08)5+200(1.08)5=7002001.082001.16642001.25972001.36052001.4693+2001.46693=700185.185171.468158.768147136.119+136.119=1,362.42

The PV of buying a new refrigerator is -$1,362.42. Thus, PV of buying a new refrigerator is greater (lower cost) than using the owner’s refrigerator. Thus, the person chooses to buy a new one.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Economics
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:Cengage