Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093897
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 26, Problem 3BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary:The catholic organizations projected to build an individual middle private school in the city P. The organizations asked the redevelopment authority to acquire a specific land and sell them for a nominal price. The land comprised a house owned by a person MS who resided there with her family. The authority offered $12,000 for the house and initiated a taking of the house. The person MS filed a case against the authority and claimed the taking was unconstitutional as the beneficiary was private.
To find:The basis on which the government entity can use the power of eminent domain to acquire the property.
Summary Introduction
Case summary:The catholic organizations projected to build an individual middle private school in the city P. The organizations asked the redevelopment authority to acquire a specific land and sell them for a nominal price. The land comprised a house owned by a person MS who resided there with her family. The authority offered $12,000 for the house and initiated a taking of the house. The person MS filed a case against the authority and claimed the taking was unconstitutional as the beneficiary was private.
To find:The limit on the power of the government entity to acquire land using the power of eminent domain.
Summary Introduction
Case summary:The catholic organizations projected to build an individual middle private school in the city P. The organizations asked the redevelopment authority to acquire a specific land and sell them for a nominal price. The land comprised a house owned by a person MS who resided there with her family. The authority offered $12,000 for the house and initiated a taking of the house. The person MS filed a case against the authority and claimed the taking was unconstitutional as the beneficiary was private.
To find:In which favor the court should rule in the given case.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In 2022, Bridget and Jeremy are married with two children, Laura and Sam. Bridget earns $60,000 from her job as an accountant. Jeremy earns $25,000 per year as a biologist. Jeremy also pays $5,000 of alimony per year to his ex-wife. Jeremy’s alimony agreement with his ex-wife was signed and executed on November 20, 2007.
Jeremy owns a 30% interest in Bio-Clean Partnership. Bio-Clean earned $60,000 in operating income during the year, it also paid a cash distribution of $20,000 to Jeremy during the year. Bridget has $5,000 of interest from City of Jackson, Mississippi Bonds. She also has $7,000 of interest from General Motors bonds.
They provide over half of the support for both of their children who live at home with them. Their daughter Laura is 17 and earns $10,000 per year at her hourly job at a hamburger restaurant. Sam is 22 years old and attends State University full-time and lives at home during the year. He earns $15,000 per year at a part-time job at a local museum.
They also…
On January 1, 2020 Alan made an interest-free loan of $200,000 to his son who used the loan to buy a house. Alan’s son has made no payments on the loan during the year. What are the income and gift tax consequences if the applicable federal rate is 5% and if Alan’s son had no investment income during the year?
Which of the following is eligible for the annual exclusion?
1. Frank designates his daughter, Holly, beneficiary of his 401(k) plan. 2. Frank designates his wife, Betty, as beneficiary of his life insurance policy. 3. Frank funds an irrevocable trust with $1,100,000 for the benefit of his son. The terms of the trust allows a payout at the discretion of the trustee. 4. Frank funds an irrevocable life insurance trust with the amount necessary to pay the premiums of the policy. The beneficiaries can take a distribution equal to the contribution each year.
Margo Riche is married to John Riche. John has a mental infirmity. They have a 22 year old daughter who has a
physical infirmity. Neither infirmity is severe enough to qualify for the disability tax credit. John has 2020 Net Income
For Tax Purposes of $6,600. Their daughter has no 2020 income. Determine the amount of any 2020 tax credits that
Margo will have related to her spouse and daughter.
Answer: Margo will be entitled to the spousal tax credit, including the additional amount for an infirm spouse. In
addition, she can daim the Canada caregiver credit for her 22 year old infirm daughter. The tofal credits would be
calculated as follows:
$2,427
$1,557
$341
$3,257
Chapter 26 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The City of Dover needs land owned by the Smith family to expand Route 13/North DuPont Highway. The Smith family does not want to sell. Discuss what course of action the city can take and the legal and constitutional basis for this action. What, if anything, can the Smith family do in response?arrow_forwardSam and Eleanor Gaito purchased a home from Howard Frank Auman, Jr., in the spring of 2011. Auman had completed the construction of the house in November 2006. In the interim, three different parties had lived in the house for brief periods, but Auman had retained ownership. The last tenants, the Ashleys, experienced difficulties with the home’s air conditioning system. Repairs were attempted, but no effort was made to change the capacity of the air conditioning unit. When the Gaitos moved into the house in June 2011, they too had problems with the air conditioning. The system created only a ten-degree difference between the outside and inside temperatures. The Gaitos complained to Auman on a number of occasions, but extensive repairs failed to correct the cooling problem. In May 2014, the Gaitos brought an action against Auman, alleging that the purchase price of the home included central air conditioning and that Auman had breached the implied warranty of habitability. At trial, an…arrow_forwardA 12-unit apartment building in Newton, Massachusetts was acquired for $8,000,000 with a 70% LTV purchase money mortgage at a 5.25% annual interest rate fully amortizing over 30 years. The new owner substantially improved the building, renovating the exterior and interior. She also implemented several environmentally friendly cost-saving measures, including the installation of solar panels on the roof, that saved energy and reduced operating expenses. After two years, these upgrades and improvements led to a substantial increase in the property’s NOI to $580,000 from a net operating income of $500,000 at the time of the acquisition. What was the acquisition cap rate? a.7.25% b.5.25% c.6.25% d. 8.25%arrow_forward
- Brandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid. Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…arrow_forwardA buys a residential property from B. the property is being leased to C. in terms of the lease agreement, C (the lessee)m has a right to purchase the property (an option) from B (the original lessor). C wants to excercise his option to purchase against A. Can C excercise his option to purchase against A?arrow_forwardReaction to discussion below: Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building where alarm systems were maintained by the ADT company. When the systems were defective and allowed water into the building, it damaged Melodee’s property; Then Melodee decided to sue ADT and their defense was that the service contract limited the liability to 10% of the annual service charge given to the customers. The limitation can be valid since the ADT company did not provide much liability protection. The ADT company can offer another protection plan to Melodee, which would cover her property but at a higher price rate. This case limitation of liability clauses will be enacted since ADT company was not fully liable for Melodee's property, which only would cover the limited 10%. A limitation of liability clauses contract states that one of the parties is not fully liable for damages in case of a breach. The ADT company is at fault for the malfunctions in their systems they should offer a higher…arrow_forward
- In 1961, Ford Motor Company acquired Autolite, a manufacturer of spark plugs, in order to enter the profitable aftermarket for spark plugs sold as replacement parts. Ford and the other major automobile manufacturers had previously purchased original equipment spark plugs (those installed in new cars when they leave the factory) from independent producers such as Autolite and Champion, either at or below the producer’s cost. The independents were willing to sell original equipment plugs so cheaply because aftermarket mechanics often replace original equipment plugs with the same brand of spark plug. GM had already moved into the spark plug market by developing its own division. Ford decided to do so by means of a vertical merger under which it acquired Autolite. Prior to the Autolite acquisition, Ford bought 10 percent of the total spark plug output. The merger left Champion as the only major independent spark plug producer. Champion’s market share thereafter declined because Chrysler…arrow_forwardDefine real property under the common law. How does real property differ from the personal property? Distinguish between surface rights and subsurface rights. Can vegetation or plants ever become real property?arrow_forwardIn 2012, Angela took out a $15,000 loan against the cash surrender value of her whole life insurance policy. The funds were required to help pay for remodeling and redecorating her home. As a consequences of taking out the loan Angela had to report $3,000 of policy gain in 2014. She repaid $5,000 of the loan at the end of 2015, as well as paying the $600 of loan interest due for the year. What were the tax consequences to Angela and the policy as a result of the 2015 payments? A. She will be able to deduct $5,600 from her taxable income for 2015 ad the ACB of the policy will increased by $2,000. B. She will be able to deduct $3,000 from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $2,600. C. She will not be able to claim any deduction from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $5,650. D. She will be able to deduct $3,600 from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $2,000arrow_forward
- How does an easement differ from a license? How does the Profit-a-Prendre differ from the license? How does zoning differ from easement interests?arrow_forwardSubject: Law on Partnership and CorporationIn the case of Islamic Directorate v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 117897, why was the sale of the piece of land null and void?arrow_forwardA 72,000 square foot multi-tenant retail property with an Equinox gym and a Wendy’s restaurant in Columbus, Ohio was recently sold for $7,200,000. Selling costs, including a brokerage fee, totaled five percent of the purchase price. The mortgage loan balance at the time of sale was $3,760,000. The property was purchased eight years earlier for $4,200,000, and annual depreciation deductions of $120,000 were taken each year for tax purposes. If the combined effective federal and state income tax rates on capital gains and tax depreciation recapture is 30%, what was the after-tax cash flow from the sale of the property? a. $2,288,000 b. $2,252,000 c. $2,540,000 d. $2,000,000arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education