Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093897
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 26, Problem 2RE
Summary Introduction
Case summary: A two-story home was sold by person W and person EB to a person VS, Roche, Maine. The deed of warranty did not specify the covenants which will be involved in the Conveyance. There was a public park adjacent to the property that included a famous frisbee golf court. The deed allowed the Roche citizen the right to walk on the public trail in the park. Teens regularly threw frisbee on the walking path that is behind VS’s land. He shouted and demanded that the teenagers should not throw the objects on his land.
To find: The covenants that were used in warranty deed for the transfer of land
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
a) Explain what right the mortgagor has to the mortgaged property once the mortgage loan has been repaid to the mortgagee.
b) When can this right be exercised?
c) What problems might a mortgagor have in exercising this right?
d) Explain the difference in exercising this right under the two land systems
Chad Parker owned an acre of property and a mobile home on that property. He sold the mobile home to David and Allison Wilson for $1,000 and sold the property to them for $10,000. These agreements were made orally. No title or deed transfers took place. The Wilsons lived in the mobile home for seven years, making $11,228.19 of improvements to the structure and to the property. After a falling out between Chad and David, Chad had the Wilsons evicted and moved back into the mobile home. Because there was no written contract between the parties, could Chad therefore legally evict the Wilsons and legally move back into the mobile home?
Sharon Love entered into a written lease agreement with Monarch Apartments for apartment 4 at 441 Winfield in Topeka, Kansas. Shortly after moving in, she experienced serious problems with termites. Her walls swelled, clouds of dirt came out, and when she checked on her children one night, she saw termites flying around the room. She complained to Monarch, which arranged for the apartment to be fumigated. When the termite problem persisted, Monarch moved Love and her children to apartment 2. Upon moving in, Love noticed that roaches crawled over the walls, ceilings, and floors of the apartment. She complained, and Monarch called an exterminator, who sprayed the apartment. When the roach problem persisted, Love vacated the premises. Has Love lawfully terminated the lease? Explain.
Chapter 26 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Eric and Susan just purchased their first home, which cost $140,000. They purchased a homeowner’s policy to insure the home for $130,000 and personal property for $80,000. They declined any coverage for additional living expenses. The deductible for the policy is $500. Soon after Eric and Susan moved into their new home, a strong windstorm caused damage to their roof. They reported the roof damage to be $19,500. While the roof was under repair, the couple had to live in a nearby hotel for three days. The hotel bill amounted to $420. Assuming the insurance company settles claims using the replacement value method, what amount will the insurance company pay for the damages to the roof?arrow_forwardIrene and Joy were co-owners of a parcel of land. On September 26, 2020, Irene discovered that Joy has sold her share to Yeri on August 25, 2020. The following day, Irene offered to redeem her share from Yeri, but the latter replied that Irene's right to redeem has already prescribed. Is Yeri correct?arrow_forwardPeter has been in practise as a doctor in Sydney since 1982. In 1984, he purchased a 25-hectares farm near Batlow, which is considered the premium apple growing region in Australia. The purchase price for the farm was $700,000. Peter borrowed the funds to purchase the farm. At the time of purchase the farm was used to grow apples and Peter continued to grow apples on the farm, employing a full-time manager for this purpose.As a result of the Black Summer bushfires in 2019/2020 however, most of the apple trees and packing sheds on Peter’s farm were destroyed. Peter decided not to replant apple trees. Instead, he decided to grow hazelnuts and cherries because he believed these would provide a higher yield than apples given current market prices.In late 2021, Peter arranged with his farm manager to oversee the removal of all remaining and burned-out apple trees on the farm and to prepare the soil to make it suitable for planting 200 cherry trees and 100 hazelnut trees. It was estimated…arrow_forward
- Oscar conveys Grouchland to Grover on January 16, 2019. Oscar conveys the same property to Elmo who does not know about Grover and who records his deed on January 18, 2019. Oscar then conveys the property to Bert who doesn't know about Grover or Elmo and who does not record the deed. Oscar then conveys the property to Ernie who knows about Bert and records the deed. Who has title to property if the jurisdiction follows a notice statute? Ernie Elmo Bert Groverarrow_forwardAlan’s real estate broker suggested that he use a quitclaim deed to sell his super cool Brentwood condo so that the buyer would: Be the grantor under the deed and have full recourse against the seller for any title related claims Acquire only the legal interest in the property that Alan previously held Know that all prior mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances had either been reconveyed or removed from the property’s title Receive assurance that the property was free from any title defectsarrow_forwardOn January 1, 2020 Alan made an interest-free loan of $200,000 to his son who used the loan to buy a house. Alan’s son has made no payments on the loan during the year. What are the income and gift tax consequences if the applicable federal rate is 5% and if Alan’s son had no investment income during the year? Which of the following is eligible for the annual exclusion? 1. Frank designates his daughter, Holly, beneficiary of his 401(k) plan. 2. Frank designates his wife, Betty, as beneficiary of his life insurance policy. 3. Frank funds an irrevocable trust with $1,100,000 for the benefit of his son. The terms of the trust allows a payout at the discretion of the trustee. 4. Frank funds an irrevocable life insurance trust with the amount necessary to pay the premiums of the policy. The beneficiaries can take a distribution equal to the contribution each year.arrow_forward
- Kevin rents a farm from Jacob, the main purpose of which is for Kevin to live in the farmhouse as his residential accommodation. During the period of the lease, and with Jacob’s consent, Kevin effects various improvements to the leased property, the most notable of which included: 1. Erecting security fences throughout the farm. 2. Planting trees. 3. Clearing and ploughing pieces of land to plant vegetables. 4. Installing sprinkler irrigation systems. The lease has reached its expiration date, and Kevin has since vacated the premises. Q.5.3 Kevin approaches you for advice on whether he can successfully recover compensation for the above improvements he made to the property. Advise Kevin on a possible action he may be able to rely on under the law of obligations and briefly explain what such an action would entail.arrow_forwardDozier and his wife, daughter, and grandson lived in the house Dozier owned. At the request of the daughter and grandson, Paschall made some improvements to the house. Dozier did not authorize these, but he knew that the improvements were being made and did not object to them. Paschall sued Dozier for the reasonable value of the improvements, but Dozier argued that he had not made any contract for such improvements. Moral of the case? Lessons Learned?arrow_forwardIn Suzanne’s will, she left her home and five acres to her niece, Abrhianna. However, before her death, Suzanne sold the property to Clark, providing a deed in fee simple. At the moment of Suzanne’s death, who owns the property? Select the right answer. a) neither Clark nor Abrhianna own the property. b) Clark and Abrhianna become co-owners of the property. c) Clark owns the property.arrow_forward
- Rae owned a farm and each summer allowed a neighbor, Fuller, to set up a stand on Rae's property to sell worms to people who drove by on their way to fish in the nearby lake. After 10 years of regularly using the small piece of property, Rae and Fuller had a dispute and Rae forbade Fuller from using his land again. Fuller claimed that he now had a right to continue using the small piece of property as he had in the past, insisting that an easement had been created. Did Fuller's continued use of the property create an easement? Why or why not?arrow_forwardTemco, Inc., conveyed to the Wynns certain property adjoining an apartment complex being developed by Sonnett Realty Company. Although nothing to this effect was contained in the deed, the sales contract gave the purchaser of the property use of the apartment’s swimming pool. Temco’s sales agent also emphasized that use of the pool would be a desirable feature in the event that the Wynns decided to sell the property. Seven years later, the Bunns contracted to buy the property from the Wynns through the latter’s agent, Sonnett Realty. Although both the Wynns and Sonnett Realty’s agent told the Bunns that the use of the apartment’s pool went with the purchased property, neither the contract nor the deed subsequently conveyed to the Bunns so provided. When the Bunns requested pool access passes from Temco and Offutt, the company that owned the apartments, their request was refused. Discuss whether the Bunns have a right to use the apartment’s pool.arrow_forwardIn her will, Teressa granted a life estate to Amos in certain real estate, with remainder to Brenda and Clive in joint tenancy. All the residue of Teressa’s estate was left to Hillman College. While going to Teressa’s funeral, the car in which Amos, Brenda, and Clive were driving was wrecked. Brenda was killed instantly, Clive died a few minutes later, and Amos died on his way to the hospital. Who is entitled to the real estate in question?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education