
a.
To construct: The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than 18 years of age and using social networking sites on their phones.
a.

Answer to Problem 25.43E
The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than 18 years of age and using social networking sites on their phones is 0.3039 to 0.3593 or 30.39% to 35.93%.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows the number of cell phone users who tend to use social media on their phones and the data is separated according to their age group.
Calculation:
Let
Thus, the proportion of Americans who are more than 18 years of age and using social networking sites on their phones is 0.3316.
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure for constructing 99% confidence interval for the given proportion is shown below:
- Click on Stat, Basic statistics and 1-proportion.
- Choose Summarized data, under Number of
events enter636, under Number of trials enter 1,918. - Click on options, choose 99% confidence interval.
- Click ok.
Output using MINITAB is given below:
Thus, the 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than 18 years of age and using social networking sites on their phones is 0.3039 to 0.3593.
b.
To compare: The two conditional distributions and also the graph of conditional distributions.
To find: The conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones.
To construct: A suitable graph for the conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones.
b.

Answer to Problem 25.43E
The Americans who are aged below 50 have ahigher percentage for using social networking sites on their phones, whereas Americans who are aged greater than 50 are using comparatively less percentage of social networking sites on their phones.
The conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones is given below:
Age Group | Conditional distribution age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones | |
Yes | No | |
18-29 | 35.85 | 8.74 |
30-49 | 44.18 | 21.92 |
50-64 | 16.67 | 37.52 |
65+ | 3.30 | 31.83 |
The bar graph showing the conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones is given below:
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sites on their phones is calculated as follows:
The conditional distribution of age for the Americans who don’t use social networking sites on their phones is calculated as follows:
The conditional distribution age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones is given below:
Conditional distribution age for the Americans who use social networking sites and who don’t use social networking sites on their phones | ||
AgeGroup | Yes | No |
18-29 | ||
30-49 | ||
50-64 | ||
65+ |
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to construct the Bar Chart using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Bar Chart.
- From Bars represent, choose Values from a table.
- Under TwoColumns of values, choose Cluster. Click OK.
- In Graph variables, enter the columns of Yes and No.
- In Row labels, enter “Age Group”.
- In Table arrangement, click “Rows are outermost categories and columns are innermost”.
- Click OK.
Interpretation:
The bar chart for comparing two conditional distributions is constructed with bars to the extreme left side of the graph, which represents the age group 18-29. Similarly, the other age groups are shown.
Justification:
The bar graph and the conditional distributions show that Americans who are aged below 50 are using the social media network much more when compared to the age group 50-65 and 65+
c.
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in the distribution of age group on social network media usage.
To find: The mean value of the test statistic given that the null hypothesis is true.
To give: The P-value.
c.

Answer to Problem 25.43E
There is a significant difference in the distribution of age group on social network media usage.
The mean value of the chi-square test statistic given that the null hypothesis is true is given is to be 3.
The P-value is 0.000.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The claim is to test whether there is any significant difference in the distribution of age group on social network media usage.
Cell frequency for using Chi-square test:
- When at most 20% of the cell frequencies are less than 5
- If all the individual frequencies are 1 or more than 1.
- All the expected frequencies must be 5 or greater than 5
The hypotheses used for testing are given below:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure for calculating the chi-square test statistic is given below:
- Click on Stat, select Tables and then click on Chi-square Test (Two-way table in a worksheet).
- Under Columns containing the table: enter the columns of Yes and No.
- Click ok.
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
Thus, the test statistic is 463.223, the degree of freedom is 3, and the P-value is 0.000.
Since all the expected frequencies are greater than 5, the usage of chi-square test is appropriate.
Conclusion:
The P-value is 0.000 and the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the level of significance.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a significant difference in the distribution of age groups on social network media usage.
Justification:
Fact:
If the null hypothesis is true, then the mean of any chi-square distribution is equal to its degrees of freedom.
From the MINITAB output, it can be observed that the degree of freedom is calculated as 3. So, the mean value of the chi-square statistic is 3.
Thus, the mean value of the chi-square statistic is 3.
Also, the observed chi-square value is
d.
To give: A comparison for the difference in the distribution of age across social media network usage.
d.

Answer to Problem 25.43E
The age group 18-29 who have said “Yes” and the 65+ age group who have said “Yes” are contributing more to the chi-square test statistic.
The comparison shows that the age group 18 and below 50 are using social network media on their phones in a higher percentage when compared with the other age group or other people.
Explanation of Solution
From the MINITAB output, it can be seen that the observed frequencies for age group 18-29, 30-49 are higher than the expected frequency, given that the null hypothesis is true.
The age group 65+ that observed frequency for “Yes” is less than the expected frequency, given that the null hypothesis is true.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 25 Solutions
BASIC PRAC OF STATISTICS+LAUNCHPAD+REE
- Calculate the correlation coefficient r, letting Row 1 represent the x-values and Row 2 the y-values. Then calculate it again, letting Row 2 represent the x-values and Row 1 the y-values. What effect does switching the variables have on r? Row 1 Row 2 13 149 25 36 41 60 62 78 S 205 122 195 173 133 197 24 Calculate the correlation coefficient r, letting Row 1 represent the x-values and Row 2 the y-values. r=0.164 (Round to three decimal places as needed.) S 24arrow_forwardThe number of initial public offerings of stock issued in a 10-year period and the total proceeds of these offerings (in millions) are shown in the table. The equation of the regression line is y = 47.109x+18,628.54. Complete parts a and b. 455 679 499 496 378 68 157 58 200 17,942|29,215 43,338 30,221 67,266 67,461 22,066 11,190 30,707| 27,569 Issues, x Proceeds, 421 y (a) Find the coefficient of determination and interpret the result. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)arrow_forwardQuestions An insurance company's cumulative incurred claims for the last 5 accident years are given in the following table: Development Year Accident Year 0 2018 1 2 3 4 245 267 274 289 292 2019 255 276 288 294 2020 265 283 292 2021 263 278 2022 271 It can be assumed that claims are fully run off after 4 years. The premiums received for each year are: Accident Year Premium 2018 306 2019 312 2020 318 2021 326 2022 330 You do not need to make any allowance for inflation. 1. (a) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the basic chain ladder method. (b) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method. 2. Comment on the differences in the reserves produced by the methods in Part 1.arrow_forward
- Use the accompanying Grade Point Averages data to find 80%,85%, and 99%confidence intervals for the mean GPA. view the Grade Point Averages data. Gender College GPAFemale Arts and Sciences 3.21Male Engineering 3.87Female Health Science 3.85Male Engineering 3.20Female Nursing 3.40Male Engineering 3.01Female Nursing 3.48Female Nursing 3.26Female Arts and Sciences 3.50Male Engineering 3.00Female Arts and Sciences 3.13Female Nursing 3.34Female Nursing 3.67Female Education 3.45Female Engineering 3.17Female Health Science 3.28Female Nursing 3.25Male Engineering 3.72Female Arts and Sciences 2.68Female Nursing 3.40Female Health Science 3.76Female Arts and Sciences 3.72Female Education 3.44Female Arts and Sciences 3.61Female Education 3.29Female Nursing 3.20Female Education 3.80Female Business 3.26Male…arrow_forwardBusiness Discussarrow_forwardCould you please answer this question using excel. For 1a) I got 84.75 and for part 1b) I got 85.33 and was wondering if you could check if my answers were correct. Thanksarrow_forward
- What is one sample T-test? Give an example of business application of this test? What is Two-Sample T-Test. Give an example of business application of this test? .What is paired T-test. Give an example of business application of this test? What is one way ANOVA test. Give an example of business application of this test? 1. One Sample T-Test: Determine whether the average satisfaction rating of customers for a product is significantly different from a hypothetical mean of 75. (Hints: The null can be about maintaining status-quo or no difference; If your alternative hypothesis is non-directional (e.g., μ≠75), you should use the two-tailed p-value from excel file to make a decision about rejecting or not rejecting null. If alternative is directional (e.g., μ < 75), you should use the lower-tailed p-value. For alternative hypothesis μ > 75, you should use the upper-tailed p-value.) H0 = H1= Conclusion: The p value from one sample t-test is _______. Since the two-tailed p-value…arrow_forwardUsing the accompanying Accounting Professionals data to answer the following questions. a. Find and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the mean years of service. b. Find and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of employees who have a graduate degree. view the Accounting Professionals data. Employee Years of Service Graduate Degree?1 26 Y2 8 N3 10 N4 6 N5 23 N6 5 N7 8 Y8 5 N9 26 N10 14 Y11 10 N12 8 Y13 7 Y14 27 N15 16 Y16 17 N17 21 N18 9 Y19 9 N20 9 N Question content area bottom Part 1 a. A 90% confidence interval for the mean years of service is (Use ascending order. Round to two decimal places as needed.)arrow_forwardIf, based on a sample size of 900,a political candidate finds that 509people would vote for him in a two-person race, what is the 95%confidence interval for his expected proportion of the vote? Would he be confident of winning based on this poll? Question content area bottom Part 1 A 9595% confidence interval for his expected proportion of the vote is (Use ascending order. Round to four decimal places as needed.)arrow_forward
- Questions An insurance company's cumulative incurred claims for the last 5 accident years are given in the following table: Development Year Accident Year 0 2018 1 2 3 4 245 267 274 289 292 2019 255 276 288 294 2020 265 283 292 2021 263 278 2022 271 It can be assumed that claims are fully run off after 4 years. The premiums received for each year are: Accident Year Premium 2018 306 2019 312 2020 318 2021 326 2022 330 You do not need to make any allowance for inflation. 1. (a) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the basic chain ladder method. (b) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method. 2. Comment on the differences in the reserves produced by the methods in Part 1.arrow_forwardA population that is uniformly distributed between a=0and b=10 is given in sample sizes 50( ), 100( ), 250( ), and 500( ). Find the sample mean and the sample standard deviations for the given data. Compare your results to the average of means for a sample of size 10, and use the empirical rules to analyze the sampling error. For each sample, also find the standard error of the mean using formula given below. Standard Error of the Mean =sigma/Root Complete the following table with the results from the sampling experiment. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) Sample Size Average of 8 Sample Means Standard Deviation of 8 Sample Means Standard Error 50 100 250 500arrow_forwardA survey of 250250 young professionals found that two dash thirdstwo-thirds of them use their cell phones primarily for e-mail. Can you conclude statistically that the population proportion who use cell phones primarily for e-mail is less than 0.720.72? Use a 95% confidence interval. Question content area bottom Part 1 The 95% confidence interval is left bracket nothing comma nothing right bracket0.60820.6082, 0.72510.7251. As 0.720.72 is within the limits of the confidence interval, we cannot conclude that the population proportion is less than 0.720.72. (Use ascending order. Round to four decimal places as needed.)arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





