a.
To construct: The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than 50 years of age and also current smokers.
a.
Answer to Problem 25.42E
The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than 50 years of age and also current smokers is 0.0826 to 0.1057or 8.26% to 10.57%.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows the results obtained by asking two questions to a random sample of 50 year old adults “How do your overall health, excellent, very good, good, fair and poor?” and the second question is “Do you smoke currently, yes or no?”
Calculation:
Let
Thus, the proportion of Americans who are more than 50 years of age and currently smoking is 0.094.
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure for constructing 99% confidence interval for the given proportion is shown below:
- Click on Stat, Basic statistics and 1-proportion.
- Choose Summarized data, under Number of
events enter 404, under Number of trials enter 4,310. - Click on options, choose 99% confidence interval.
- Click ok.
Output using MINITAB is given below:
Thus, the 99% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who are more than who are more than 50 years of age and also current smokers is 0.0826 to 0.1057.
b.
To compare: The two conditional distributions and also the graph of conditional distributions.
To find: The conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sitesand who don’t use social networking siteson their phones.
To construct: A suitable graph for the conditional distribution of age for the Americans who use social networking sitesand who don’t use social networking siteson their phones.
b.
Answer to Problem 25.42E
- The bar graph and the conditional distributions show that Americans are currently smoking have lowest percentages in “excellent” and “very good” health evaluation whereas Americans who are not currently smoking have highest percentages in “excellent” and “very good” health evaluation.
- The percentages in “fair and poor” health evaluation is more in currently smoking group when compared to the percentages for the same categories under not currently smoking group.
The conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are currently smoking and not currently smoking is given below:
Conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are currently smoking and not currently smoking | ||
Health Evaluation | Yes | No |
Excellent | 6.20 | 12.4 |
Very good | 28.50 | 39.9 |
Good | 35.90 | 33.5 |
Fair | 22.30 | 14.0 |
Poor | 7.18 | 0.3 |
The bar graph showing the conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are currently smoking and not currently smoking is given below:
- Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are current smokers is calculated as follows:
The conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are not current smokers is calculated as follows:
The conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are currently smoking and not currently smoking is given below:
Conditional distribution of health evaluation for the Americans who are currently smoking and not currently smoking | ||
Health Evaluation | Yes | No |
Excellent |
|
|
Very good |
|
|
Good |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Poor |
|
|
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to construct the Bar Chart using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Bar Chart.
- From Bars represent, choose Values from a table.
- Under Two Columns of values, choose Cluster. Click OK.
- In Graph variables, enter the columns of Yes and No.
- In Row labels, enter “Health Evaluation”.
- In Table arrangement, click “columns are outermost categories and columns are innermost”.
- Click OK.
- Interpretation:
- The bar chart for comparing two conditional distributions is constructed with bars to the extreme left side of the graph, which represents the currently smoking group.
- c.
- To test: Whether there is a significant difference between health evaluation and currently smoking and not currently smoking group.
- To find: The mean value of the test statistic given that the null hypothesis is true.
- To give: The P-value.
- c.
Answer to Problem 25.42E
- There is a significant difference between health evaluation and currently smoking and not currently smoking group.
- The mean value of the chi-square test statistic given that the null hypothesis is true is given is to be 4.
- The P-value is 0.000.
Explanation of Solution
- Calculation:
- The claim is to test whether there is any significant difference between health evaluation and currently smoking and not currently smoking group.
Cell frequency for using Chi-square test:
- When at most 20% of the cell frequencies are less than 5
- If all the individual frequencies are 1 or more than 1.
- All the expected frequencies must be 5 or greater than 5
The hypotheses used for testing are given below:
Software procedure:
Step-by-stepprocedure for calculating the chi-square test statistic is given below:
- Click on Stat, select Tables and then click on Chi-square Test (Two-way table in a worksheet).
- Under Columns containing the table: enter the columns of Yes and No.
- Click ok.
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
Thus, the test statistic is 229.660, the degree of freedom is 4, and the P-value is 0.000.
Only one cell is having an expected frequency less than 5. The usage of chi-square test is appropriate.
Conclusion:
The P-value is 0.000 and the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the level of significance.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a significant difference between health evaluation and currently smoking and not currently smoking group.
Justification:
Fact:
If the null hypothesis is true, then the mean of any chi-square distribution is equal to its degrees of freedom.
From the MINITAB output, it can be observed that the degree of freedom is calculated as 3. So, the mean value of the chi-square statistic is 3.
Thus, the mean value of the chi-square statistic is 3.
Also, the observed chi-square value is
d.
To give: A comparison for the difference in the distribution of age across social media network usage.
d.
Explanation of Solution
Comparison:
From the MINITAB output, it can be seen that the observed frequencies for good, fair and poor health evaluation for currently smoking group is higher than the expected frequency, given that the null hypothesis is true.
In non-smoking group the observed frequencies for good, fair and poor health evaluation is lesser than the expected frequency.
The people who are currently smoking have a poor health condition when compared to the non smoking group.
Hence, there is a significant difference in the health evaluation for currently smoking and not currently smoking group.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 25 Solutions
The Basic Practice of Statistics
- A recent survey of 400 americans asked whether or not parents do too much for their young adult children. The results of the survey are shown in the data file. a) Construct the frequency and relative frequency distributions. How many respondents felt that parents do too much for their adult children? What proportion of respondents felt that parents do too little for their adult children? b) Construct a pie chart. Summarize the findingsarrow_forwardThe average number of minutes Americans commute to work is 27.7 minutes (Sterling's Best Places, April 13, 2012). The average commute time in minutes for 48 cities are as follows: Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Albuquerque 23.3 Jacksonville 26.2 Phoenix 28.3 Atlanta 28.3 Kansas City 23.4 Pittsburgh 25.0 Austin 24.6 Las Vegas 28.4 Portland 26.4 Baltimore 32.1 Little Rock 20.1 Providence 23.6 Boston 31.7 Los Angeles 32.2 Richmond 23.4 Charlotte 25.8 Louisville 21.4 Sacramento 25.8 Chicago 38.1 Memphis 23.8 Salt Lake City 20.2 Cincinnati 24.9 Miami 30.7 San Antonio 26.1 Cleveland 26.8 Milwaukee 24.8 San Diego 24.8 Columbus 23.4 Minneapolis 23.6 San Francisco 32.6 Dallas 28.5 Nashville 25.3 San Jose 28.5 Denver 28.1 New Orleans 31.7 Seattle 27.3 Detroit 29.3 New York 43.8 St. Louis 26.8 El Paso 24.4 Oklahoma City 22.0 Tucson 24.0 Fresno 23.0 Orlando 27.1 Tulsa 20.1 Indianapolis 24.8 Philadelphia 34.2 Washington, D.C. 32.8 a. What is the mean commute time for…arrow_forwardMorningstar tracks the total return for a large number of mutual funds. The following table shows the total return and the number of funds for four categories of mutual funds. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Type of Fund Domestic Equity Number of Funds Total Return (%) 9191 4.65 International Equity 2621 18.15 Hybrid 1419 2900 11.36 6.75 Specialty Stock a. Using the number of funds as weights, compute the weighted average total return for these mutual funds. (to 2 decimals) % b. Is there any difficulty associated with using the "number of funds" as the weights in computing the weighted average total return in part (a)? Discuss. What else might be used for weights? The input in the box below will not be graded, but may be reviewed and considered by your instructor. c. Suppose you invested $10,000 in this group of mutual funds and diversified the investment by placing $2000 in Domestic Equity funds, $4000 in International Equity funds, $3000 in Specialty Stock…arrow_forward
- The days to maturity for a sample of five money market funds are shown here. The dollar amounts invested in the funds are provided. Days to Maturity 20 Dollar Value ($ millions) 20 12 30 7 10 5 6 15 10 Use the weighted mean to determine the mean number of days to maturity for dollars invested in these five money market funds (to 1 decimal). daysarrow_forwardc. What are the first and third quartiles? First Quartiles (to 1 decimals) Third Quartiles (to 4 decimals) × ☑ Which companies spend the most money on advertising? Business Insider maintains a list of the top-spending companies. In 2014, Procter & Gamble spent more than any other company, a whopping $5 billion. In second place was Comcast, which spent $3.08 billion (Business Insider website, December 2014). The top 12 companies and the amount each spent on advertising in billions of dollars are as follows. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company Procter & Gamble Comcast Advertising ($billions) $5.00 3.08 2.91 Company American Express General Motors Advertising ($billions) $2.19 2.15 ETET AT&T Ford Verizon L'Oreal 2.56 2.44 2.34 Toyota Fiat Chrysler Walt Disney Company J.P Morgan a. What is the mean amount spent on advertising? (to 2 decimals) 2.55 b. What is the median amount spent on advertising? (to 3 decimals) 2.09 1.97 1.96 1.88arrow_forwardMartinez Auto Supplies has retail stores located in eight cities in California. The price they charge for a particular product in each city are vary because of differing competitive conditions. For instance, the price they charge for a case of a popular brand of motor oil in each city follows. Also shown are the number of cases that Martinez Auto sold last quarter in each city. City Price ($) Sales (cases) Bakersfield 34.99 501 Los Angeles 38.99 1425 Modesto 36.00 294 Oakland 33.59 882 Sacramento 40.99 715 San Diego 38.59 1088 San Francisco 39.59 1644 San Jose 37.99 819 Compute the average sales price per case for this product during the last quarter? Round your answer to two decimal places.arrow_forward
- Consider the following data and corresponding weights. xi Weight(wi) 3.2 6 2.0 3 2.5 2 5.0 8 a. Compute the weighted mean (to 2 decimals). b. Compute the sample mean of the four data values without weighting. Note the difference in the results provided by the two computations (to 3 decimals).arrow_forwardExpert only,if you don't know it don't attempt it, no Artificial intelligence or screen shot it solvingarrow_forwardFor context, the image provided below is a quesion from a Sepetember, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- For context, the images attached below (the question and the related figure) is from a january 2024 past paperarrow_forwardFor context, the image attached below is a question from a June 2024 past paper in statisical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below are a question from a June, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman