Concept explainers
Western Airlines is considering a new route that will require adding an additional Boeing 777 to its fleet. Western can purchase the airplane for $225 million or lease it for $25 million per year. If it purchases the airplane, its seating can be optimized, and the new route is expected to generate profits of $50 million per year. If leased, the route will only generate profits of $35 million per year. Suppose the appropriate cost of capital is 12.5% and that, if purchased, the plane can be sold at any time for an expected resale price of $225 million. Ignore taxes.
- a. As a one-year decision, does purchasing or leasing the plane have higher
NPV ? - b. Suppose the funds to purchase or lease the plane will come from equity holders (for example, by reducing the amount of Western's current dividend). Western also has one-year debt outstanding, and there is a 10% (risk-neutral23) probability that over the next year Western will declare bankruptcy and its equity holders will be wiped out. Otherwise, the debt will be rolled over at the end of the year. Is purchasing or leasing the plane more attractive to equity holders?
Chapter 21 explains risk-neutral probabilities. If you have not read that chapter, you can work the problem and get the same answers by assuming that the specified probabilities are the actual probabilities of default but the risk of default is purely idiosyncratic risk.
- c. At what (risk-neutral) probability of default would equity holders' preference for leasing versus purchasing the plane change?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 25 Solutions
EBK CORPORATE FINANCE
- Consider a situation involving determining right and wrong. Do you believe utilitarianism provides a more objective viewpoint than moral rights in this context? Why or why not? How about when comparing utilitarianism to principles of justice? Share your thoughts. Reflect on this statement: "Every principle of distributive justice, whether that of the egalitarian, the capitalist, the socialist, the libertarian, or Rawls, in the end is illegitimately advocating some type of equality." Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Why might someone claim this, and how would you respond?arrow_forwardI need help checking my spreadsheet. Q: Assume that Temp Force’s dividend is expected to experience supernormal growth of 73%from Year 0 to Year 1, 47% from Year 1 to Year 2, 32% from Year 2 to Year 3 and 21% from year3 to year 4. After Year 4, dividends will grow at a constant rate of 2.75%. What is the stock’sintrinsic value under these conditions? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gainsyield during the first year? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gains yield duringthe fifth year (from Year 4 to Year 5)?arrow_forwardwhat are the five components of case study design? Please help explain with examplesarrow_forward
- Commissions are usually charged when a right is exercised. a warrant is exercised. a right is sold. all of the above will have commissions A and B are correct, C is not correctarrow_forwardWhat is Exploratory Research Case Study? What is the main purpose of Exploratory Research?arrow_forwardplease help with how to solve this thank you.arrow_forward
- Question 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 22 5000–200 000. 10 825000 2.5000.00 2 x 25000 =8500 2 maarrow_forwardQuestion 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 225000–200 000 = 825000 25000.002 × 25000 1= 8500 16 50+ 500 2 marksarrow_forwardSuppose you deposit $1,000 today (t = 0) in a bank account that pays an interest rate of 7% per year. If you keep the account for 5 years before you withdraw all the money, how much will you be able to withdraw after 5 years? Calculate using formula. Calculate using year-by-year approach. Find the present value of a security that will pay $2,500 in 4 years. The opportunity cost (interest rate that you could earn from alternative investments) is 5%. Calculate using the formula. Calculate using year-by-year discounting approach. Solve for the unknown in each of the following: Present value Years Interest rate Future value $50,000 12 ? $152,184 $21,400 30 ? $575,000 $16,500 ? 14% $238,830 $21,400 ? 9% $213,000 Suppose you enter into a monthly deposit scheme with Chase, where you have your salary account. The bank will deduct $25 from your salary account every month and the first payment (deduction) will be made…arrow_forward
- Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning