a.
The
Explanation: The net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Explanation:
Calculate the net present value as shown below.
Particulars | Cash flow | Present value at 10% | Present value of net cash flow |
Year 1 |
$8,000 |
0.9091 |
$7,272.8 |
Year 2 |
$8,000 |
0.8264 |
$6,611.2 |
Year 3 |
$8,000 |
0.7513 |
$6,010.4 |
Year 4 |
$8,000 |
0.6830 |
$5,464.0 |
Year 5 |
$8,000 |
0.6209 |
$4,967.2 |
Year 6 |
$8,000 |
0.5645 |
$4,516.0 |
Year 7 |
$8,000 |
0.5132 |
$4,105.6 |
Year 8 |
$11,000 |
0.4665 |
$5,131.5 |
Total |
$44,078.7 | ||
Invested outflows |
$67,000 |
($50,000.0) | |
Net present value |
-$5,921.3 |
Table – 1
Therefore, the net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Working Notes:
(a) On deduction of yearly operating cost from yearly revenues, the yearly cash flow is obtained.
(b) The
(c) The cost of old machine is not considered as the invested amount, as such cost is historical cost.
Conclusion:
Since the total cash flows are smaller than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
b.
The net present value of alternative 2.
Explanation: The net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Explanation:
Calculate the net present value as shown below.
Particulars | Cash flow | Present value at 10% | Present value of net cash flow |
Year 1 | $38,000 | 0.9091 | $34,545.8 |
Year 2 | $38,000 | 0.8264 | $31,403.2 |
Year 3 | $38,000 | 0.7513 | $28,549.4 |
Year 4 | $38,000 | 0.6830 | $25,954.0 |
Year 5 | $38,000 | 0.6209 | $23,594.2 |
Year 6 | $38,000 | 0.5645 | $21,451.0 |
Year 7 | $38,000 | 0.5132 | $19,501.6 |
Year 8 | $46,000 | 0.4665 | $21,459.0 |
Total cash flows | $206,458.2 | ||
Invested outflows | $312,000 | ($145,000.0) | |
Net present value | $61,458.2 |
Table – 2
Therefore, the net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Working Notes:
(a) On deduction of yearly operating cost from yearly revenues, the yearly cash flow is obtained.
(b) The cash inflow of $46,000 is obtained by adding the salvage value of $8,000 is added in the actual cash inflow of the eighth year.
(c) The cost of old machine is not considered as the invested amount, as such cost is historical cost.
Conclusion:
Since the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
c.
To ascertain: The alternative to be recommended to management.
Explanation: Alternative 2 should be selected.
Explanation:
The projects or alternatives with positive NPV should be accepted, as the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount. The net present value of the alternative 1 is -$5,921.3 and that of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Hence, alternative 1 shows the negative net present value and alternative 2 shows positive net present value.
Conclusion:
Hence, alternative 2 should be recommended to the management.
a.

Explanation of Solution
The net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Since the total cash flows are smaller than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
b.
The net present value of alternative 2.
b.

Explanation of Solution
The net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Since the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
c.
To ascertain: The alternative to be recommended to management.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Alternative 2 should be selected.
Hence, alternative 2 should be recommended to the management.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
CONNECT PLUS-FINANCIAL & MANAGERIAL AC
- I am searching for the accurate solution to this general accounting problem with the right approach.arrow_forwardFinancial Accounting Question: A new common stock issue that paid a $1.77 dividend last year. The parvalue of the stock is $15, and the firm's dividends per share have grown at a rate of 7.8% per year. The growth rate is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. The price of this stock is now 27.33. The cost of common equity for the firm is __%.Need Answerarrow_forwardPlease provide the accurate answer to this general accounting problem using valid techniques.arrow_forward
- Solve with explanation and accounting questionarrow_forwardI am searching for the accurate solution to this general accounting problem with the right approach.arrow_forwardAuburn Co., a graphic design agency, applies overhead to jobs based on direct professional labor hours. Overhead was estimated to be $245,000, direct professional labor hours were estimated to be 25,000, and direct professional labor cost was projected to be $400,000. During the year, Auburn incurred actual overhead costs of$218,600, actual direct professional labor hours of 21,800, and actual direct labor costs of $362,000. By year-end, the firm's overhead was ___.arrow_forward
- How much cash did Creswell Corporation collect on the account?arrow_forwardHello tutor please given General accounting question answer do fast and properly explain all answerarrow_forwardFlorida Tech had fixed assets of $22,500 at the beginning of the year and $25,000 at the end of the year. You also know that the firm sold $6,500 in fixed assets over the year. How much in fixed assets must they have purchased?arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





