![Economics (Irwin Economics)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259723223/9781259723223_largeCoverImage.gif)
Subpart (a):
The preventive health care cost effectiveness.
Subpart (a):
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.
Concept introduction:
Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.
Sub part (b):
The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.
Sub part (b):
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
Economics (Irwin Economics)
- The first question, the drop down options are: the US, Canada, and Mexico The second question, the drop down options are: the US, Canada, and Mexico The last two questions are explained in the photo.arrow_forwardcheck my answers, fix them if they are wrong. everything is in the picture. the drop down menus are either kansas or Illinois, except the last one which is yes or no.arrow_forwardeverything is in the imagearrow_forward
- everything is in the image!arrow_forwardRespond to isaiah Great day everyone and welcome to week 6! Every time we start to have fun, the government ruins it! The success of your business due to the strong economy explains why my spouse feels excited. The increase in interest rates may lead to a decline in new home demand. When mortgage rates rise they lead to higher costs which can discourage potential buyers and reduce demand in the housing market. The government increases interest rates as a measure to suppress inflation and stop the economy from growing too fast. Business expansion during this period presents significant risks. Before making significant investments it would be prudent to monitor how the market responds to the rate increase. Business expansion during a decline in demand for new homes could create financial difficulties.arrow_forwardPlace the labeled CS to represent the new consumer surplus in the market and the area labeled PS to represent producer surplusarrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardRespond to Luis Rodriguez I recommend Mrs. Ibrahim's proposal to lower interest rates as the more effective approach for fostering economic growth in Sudan. Sustainable Growth - Lowering interest rates encourages investment in productive capacity, which can lead to long-term economic growth rather than a temporary boost from cash transfers. Job Creation - This approach can create more stable employment opportunities by promoting business expansion through lower borrowing costs. Addressing Structural Issues - Lower interest rates can help address underlying structural issues in the economy, such as low production levels, by incentivizing businesses to invest in technology and infrastructure. Inflation Control - While there is a risk of inflation if appropriately managed, focusing on productive investments can help mitigate this risk compared to the potential inflationary effects of direct cash transfers. In conclusion, while both proposals have merit, Mrs. Ibrahim's approach of…arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337668279/9781337668279_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781544336329/9781544336329_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337617383/9781337617383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337617390/9781337617390_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337617406/9781337617406_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781947172364/9781947172364_smallCoverImage.jpg)