(a)
To construct: The stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.
To check: Whether it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way or not.
(a)
Answer to Problem 24.58SE
Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Stemplot for Normal Mice:
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Yes, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows the measured the difference in electrical potential between the Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.
Calculation:
Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Diabetic Mice by using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
- In Graph variables, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- Click OK.
Observation:
From Stemplot for Diabetic Mice, it is clear that the left side of the stemplot extended larger than the right side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Diabetic Mice is left-skewed with one low outlier.
Stemplot for Normal Mice:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Normal Mice by using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
- In Graph variables, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Click OK.
Observation:
From Stemplot for Normal Mice, it is clear that the right side of the stemplot extended same as in the left side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Normal Mice is symmetric.
Justification:
From the Stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice, it can be observed that the distribution of the two groups is symmetric without considering the outliers. Hence, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.
(b)
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in
(b)
Answer to Problem 24.58SE
The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
- Choose Sample in different columns.
- In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.08 and the P-value is 0.004.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.004 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
(c)
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups or not.
To check: Whether the outlier affects the conclusion or not.
(c)
Answer to Problem 24.58SE
The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
No, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value without outlier using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
- Choose Sample in different columns.
- In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.84 and the P-value is 0.000.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.000 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
Justification:
From the results, it can be observed that the conclusions for inference with outlier and without outlier are same. Hence, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
The Basic Practice of Statistics
- Morningstar tracks the total return for a large number of mutual funds. The following table shows the total return and the number of funds for four categories of mutual funds. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Type of Fund Domestic Equity Number of Funds Total Return (%) 9191 4.65 International Equity 2621 18.15 Hybrid 1419 2900 11.36 6.75 Specialty Stock a. Using the number of funds as weights, compute the weighted average total return for these mutual funds. (to 2 decimals) % b. Is there any difficulty associated with using the "number of funds" as the weights in computing the weighted average total return in part (a)? Discuss. What else might be used for weights? The input in the box below will not be graded, but may be reviewed and considered by your instructor. c. Suppose you invested $10,000 in this group of mutual funds and diversified the investment by placing $2000 in Domestic Equity funds, $4000 in International Equity funds, $3000 in Specialty Stock…arrow_forwardThe days to maturity for a sample of five money market funds are shown here. The dollar amounts invested in the funds are provided. Days to Maturity 20 Dollar Value ($ millions) 20 12 30 7 10 5 6 15 10 Use the weighted mean to determine the mean number of days to maturity for dollars invested in these five money market funds (to 1 decimal). daysarrow_forwardc. What are the first and third quartiles? First Quartiles (to 1 decimals) Third Quartiles (to 4 decimals) × ☑ Which companies spend the most money on advertising? Business Insider maintains a list of the top-spending companies. In 2014, Procter & Gamble spent more than any other company, a whopping $5 billion. In second place was Comcast, which spent $3.08 billion (Business Insider website, December 2014). The top 12 companies and the amount each spent on advertising in billions of dollars are as follows. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company Procter & Gamble Comcast Advertising ($billions) $5.00 3.08 2.91 Company American Express General Motors Advertising ($billions) $2.19 2.15 ETET AT&T Ford Verizon L'Oreal 2.56 2.44 2.34 Toyota Fiat Chrysler Walt Disney Company J.P Morgan a. What is the mean amount spent on advertising? (to 2 decimals) 2.55 b. What is the median amount spent on advertising? (to 3 decimals) 2.09 1.97 1.96 1.88arrow_forward
- Martinez Auto Supplies has retail stores located in eight cities in California. The price they charge for a particular product in each city are vary because of differing competitive conditions. For instance, the price they charge for a case of a popular brand of motor oil in each city follows. Also shown are the number of cases that Martinez Auto sold last quarter in each city. City Price ($) Sales (cases) Bakersfield 34.99 501 Los Angeles 38.99 1425 Modesto 36.00 294 Oakland 33.59 882 Sacramento 40.99 715 San Diego 38.59 1088 San Francisco 39.59 1644 San Jose 37.99 819 Compute the average sales price per case for this product during the last quarter? Round your answer to two decimal places.arrow_forwardConsider the following data and corresponding weights. xi Weight(wi) 3.2 6 2.0 3 2.5 2 5.0 8 a. Compute the weighted mean (to 2 decimals). b. Compute the sample mean of the four data values without weighting. Note the difference in the results provided by the two computations (to 3 decimals).arrow_forwardExpert only,if you don't know it don't attempt it, no Artificial intelligence or screen shot it solvingarrow_forward
- For context, the image provided below is a quesion from a Sepetember, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below (the question and the related figure) is from a january 2024 past paperarrow_forwardFor context, the image attached below is a question from a June 2024 past paper in statisical modelingarrow_forward
- For context, the images attached below are a question from a June, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below (question and related graph) are from a February 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below are from a February 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman