Case s ummar y:A company POM is making and selling pomegranate-based products. The company in ads claimed that it will prevent or reduce heart disease and cancer on daily consumption. Federal Trade Commission(FTC) charged the company for misleading and misrepresentation ads. The company was barred for future ads and affirmed that other advertisements of the company are deceptive. The court affirmed that the benefits in its product required Randomized Controlled Trials result. The court ordered that benefits in Ads should be supported by the evidence to the consumer in a non-misleading way.
To find:The validity of arguments advanced by the company POM.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 24 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- Please need help with this general accounting question not use aiarrow_forwardWhat is a good example of a letter of recommendation for a 5th grade Language Arts Teaching Position at an elementary school from a school principal?arrow_forwardWhat is a good example of a letter of recommendation for a 5th grade Language Arts Teaching Position at an elementary school from a School Principal?arrow_forward
