Case s ummar y:A company POM is making and selling pomegranate-based products. The company in ads claimed that it will prevent or reduce heart disease and cancer on daily consumption. Federal Trade Commission(FTC) charged the company for misleading and misrepresentation ads. The company was barred for future ads and affirmed that other advertisements of the company are deceptive. The court affirmed that the benefits in its product required Randomized Controlled Trials result. The court ordered that benefits in Ads should be supported by the evidence to the consumer in a non-misleading way.
To find:The validity of arguments advanced by the company POM.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 24 Solutions
MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
- Can you solve this general accounting question with accurate accounting calculations?arrow_forwardIn 2019, Philip Industries sold 3,800 units at $275 each. Variable costs were $195 per unit, and fixed costs were $120,000. What was Philip Industries' 2019 net income?arrow_forwardAccounting problemarrow_forward
- Accounting?arrow_forwardPlease help me solve this general accounting question using the right accounting principles.arrow_forwardFenton Manufacturing Inc. had a variable costing operating income of $128,400 in 2023. Ending inventory decreased during 2023 from 45,000 units to 40,000 units. During both 2022 and 2023, fixed manufacturing overhead was $1,080,000, and 135,000 units were produced. Determine the absorption costing operating income for 2023.arrow_forward
