The income inequality in the US.
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the distribution of US income by households in 2008:
Table -1
Personal Income Category | Percentage of all households in this category |
Under $10,000 | 7.1 |
$10,000-$14,999 | 5.8 |
$15,000-$24,999 | 11.8 |
$25,000-$34,999 | 10.9 |
$35,000-$49,999 | 14.0 |
$50,000-$99,999 | 17.9 |
$100,000 and above | 11.9 |
20.5 | |
100.0 |
As per table -1, the highest 20% have received an income share of 50% in 2008. This is ten times more than the 3.4% than the lowest 20% received. The three quintiles in the middle get less that 50% of the total income before tax. When we combine the bottom three quintiles on top of two quintiles that receive almost twice of them. So, the fact is that the top to 20% are receiving as much as 80% at the bottom.
The government's effect on the income distribution happens through taxes and transfer payments. It has a slightly progressive effect of federal, state, and local taxes on distribution of income as people with a high income have a pay of a higher percentage of their income in taxes when compared to people with a lower income. The main contribution of the government for income equality happens through transfer programs i.e. 80% of the times. The benefit of this contribution goes mainly to people in the lowest quintile where 75% of the income that these people earn is through government transfer payments.
Though these statistics may suggest that the government is contributing heavily to equalize the income, it might be all correct. As the transfer programs provided to people with a lower income decrease the incentive to work so the income earned will be further down. Also, not all these transfer programs got to the poor. For example, in case of subsidies, farming always goes to the farmers that are wealthy. Middle and higher class students get the benefit of education funding by the government than the ones with a lower income.
Concept Introduction:
Income inequality: It is the unequal distribution of a household or an individual income across the various participants in an economy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- As income transfer programs accompanying the War on Poverty increased beginning in the latter half of the 1960s, what happened to poverty in the United States? Check all that apply. O The adjusted poverty rate has declined rapidly and is now less than half of the official poverty rate. O The poverty rate declined substantially in the period before the War on Poverty, but not in the period after the start of the War on Poverty. O In 2018, the adjusted poverty rate was only 4 percentage points lower than the official rate in 1970. O The War on Poverty has been largely ineffective in reducing the rate of poverty in the United States.arrow_forward7. LO 2, 4 Suppose that a consumer can earn a higher wage rate for working overtime. That is, for the first q hours the consumer works, he or she receives a real wage rate of w, and for hours worked more than q he or she receives w, where W2>W1. Suppose that the consumer pays no taxes and receives no nonwage income, and he or she is free to choose hours of work. (a) Draw the consumer's budget constraint, and show his or her optimal choice of consump- tion and leisure (b) Show that the consumer would never work hours, or anything very close to q Explain the intuition behind this. (c) Determine what hours. happens if the overtime wage rate w2 increases. Explain your results in terms of income and substitution effects. You must consider the case of a worker who initially works overtime, and a worker who initially does not work overtime.arrow_forwardPROBLEMS 1. Workers are compensated by firms with “benefits” in addition to wages and salaries. The most prominent benefit offered by many firms is health insurance. Suppose that in 2000, workers at one steel plant were paid $20 per hour and in addition received health benefits at the rate of $4 per hour. Also suppose that by 2010 workers at that plant were paid $21 per hour but received $9 in health insurance benefits. LO17.1 By what percentage did total compensation (wages plus benefits) change at this plant from 2000 to 2010? What was the approximate average annual percentage change in total compensation? By what percentage did wages change at this plant from 2000 to 2010? What was the approximate average annual percentage change in wages? If workers value a dollar of health benefits as much as they value a dollar of wages, by what total percentage will they feel that their incomes have risen over this time period? What if they only consider wages when calculating their incomes?…arrow_forward
- Explain how a country may experience greater equality in the distribution of income, yet still experience high rates of poverty. Hint: Look at the Clear It Up 'How do governments measure poverty in low-income countries?' and compare to Table 15.5.arrow_forwardLO 2, 4 Suppose that a consumer can earn a higher wage rate for working overtime. That is, for the first q hours the consumer works, he or she receives a real wage rate of w1, and for hours worked more than q he or she receives w2, where w2 > w1. Suppose that the consumer pays no taxes and receives no nonwage income, and he or she is free to choose hours of work. a. Draw the consumer's budget constraint, and show his or her optimal choice of consumption and leisure. b. Show that the consumer would never work q hours, or anything very close to q hours. Explain the intuition behind this. c. Determine what happens if the overtime wage rate wz increases. Explain your results in terms of income and substitution effects. You must consider the case of a worker who initially works overtime, and a worker who initially does not work overtime.arrow_forwardThe government announces programs designed to reduce the share of income going to the top quintile from 60% to 20%. You predict that the most likely result is that: O mean household income will fall, because the highest income earners will earn less and work less. median household income will rise, because some of the 40% of redistributed income will be transferred to the third quintile. after redistribution, each quintile will receive 20% of total wealth. O the lowest quintile will receive the 40% taken from the top quintile and switch places.arrow_forward
- "Growth and improvement in inequality are important to alleviate poverty.' а. Examine any FOUR (4) factors that can influence poverty eradication and income distribution in Malaysia. [12 marks] b. Describe any FOUR (4) factors that affect the income distribution in Malaysia.arrow_forward4. Suppose country A has the following cumulative distribution of income: Cumulative Cumulative Percent of Percent of Families Total Income 20 5 40 15 50 27 60 30 80 50 90 70 95 82 Compute the quintile shares. What is the share of total income of the top 10 percent of families and of the top 5 percent of families?arrow_forwardSuppose that a country has 20 million households. Ten million are poor households that each have labor market earnings of $20,000 per year and 10 million are rich households that each have labor market earnings of $80,000 per year. If the government enacted a marginal tax of 10 percent on all labor market earnings above $20,000 and transferred this money to households earning $20,000 or less, would the incomes of the poor rise by $8,000 per year? O A. No. Workers in rich and poor households would work less because of the marginal tax. O B. Yes. 10% of $80,000 is $8,000; therefore, $8,000 from each rich household would be transferred to each poor household. O C. There is not enough information to determine household behavior in this case. O D. No. Only workers in rich households would work less because of the marginal tax.arrow_forward
- Show instructions Question 1 Income poverty is about the lack of access to the basic rights of food, clothes and shelter, education, proper health care, clean water -- rights that most of us take for grante ○ True O False Question 2 ( Population is not a direct cause of poverty, but it does compound the problem of poverty. True O False Question 3 Income levels do not necessarily reflect levels of poverty. O True O False Questions 1-10 of 10 | Page 1 of 1 Question 4 War is perhaps the most devastating and serious cause of poverty. O True O False Question 5 The World Bank has established an international poverty line of $10 a day per person in 1985 purchasing power parity (PPP) prices. O True O False Question 6 Analysts have found a strong positive relationship between economic growth and poverty reduction. O True O False Question 7 Most of the world's poor live in South Asia. True O Falsearrow_forwardConsider the following table that gives the monthly per capita consumption expenditure of 10 households with poverty line given as $500 per month. Poverty Gap is %. Monthly per capita consumption expenditure (in $) of 10 households 5 400 300 1000 2500 4 9 400 950 2 3 6 7 8 10 Country A 900 1200 505 100 O a 40 O b. 13 O c. 27 O d. 16arrow_forward5. Describe the reasons behind the new attention to the issue of income inequality in the United States.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax