Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134078779
Author: Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 23, Problem 1.1P
To determine

The relationship between MPC and MPS and aggregate output and aggregate income.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Option (a):

MPC is the marginal propensity to consume which represents that portion of change in income that is consumed or spent.

Option (b):

MPS is the marginal propensity to save which represents that portion of change in income that is saved.

Option (c):

Aggregate output refers to the total quantity of goods and services produced over a given period of time in an economy.

Option (d):

Aggregate income refers to the total amount received by all factors of production in a given time period.

The relationship between MPC and MPS can be established as follows:

Since all the income is either consumed (spent) or saved; MPC+MPS=1 .

The relationship between aggregate output and aggregate income is that both are actually the same thing viewed from different points.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Marginal propensity to consume (MPC): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.

Marginal propensity to save (MPS): The ratio of change in saving when there is a change in disposable income.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781337111522
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
MACROECONOMICS
Economics
ISBN:9781337794985
Author:Baumol
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:9781337613057
Author:Tucker
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning