MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093842
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 21, Problem 9BCP
(a)
Summary Introduction
Case s ummary : A homosexual person S was an employee of the company EI. Other employees of EI including the supervisor of S made derogatory comments about his sexual orientation. S filed a complaint against them in the Human resources department, but the company fired him. State laws prohibited the employer to do any kind of discrimination against an employee based on their sexual preferences.
To find: The validity of a claim of retaliation by S.
(b)
Summary Introduction
Case s ummary :A homosexual person S was an employee of the company EI. Other employees of EI including the supervisor of S made derogatory comments about his sexual orientation. S filed a complaint against them in the Human resources department, but the company fired him. State laws prohibited the employer to do any kind of discrimination against an employee based on their sexual preferences.
To find: Whether homosexuality is protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Summary Introduction
Case s ummary :A homosexual person S was an employee of the company EI. Other employees of EI including the supervisor of S made derogatory comments about his sexual orientation. S filed a complaint against them in the Human resources department, but the company fired him. State laws prohibited employer to do any kind of discrimination against an employee based on their sexual preferences.
To find: The argument for or against amending the federal law that prohibits any kind of employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preferences.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Employee, a Muslim, is a management trainee at an airport car rental office. As part of her religious practice, employee wears a hijab (headscarf). She is told by her supervisor that the hijab does not match the uniforms she is required to wear, so she must stop wearing them or be transferred to another position with less customer interaction. Employee was later terminated as part of a company cutback. She sues for religious discrimination. Does she win? Explain.
Employee, a Muslim, is a management trainee at an airport car rental office. As part of her religious practice, employee wears a hijab (headscarf). She is told by her supervisor that the hijab does not match the uniforms she is required to wear, so she must stop wearing them or be transferred to another position with less customer interaction. Employee was later terminated as part of a company cutback. She sues for religious discrimination. Does she win?
Your friend is a human resource manager who believes that his cat is a god and that his cat’sbirthday is a religious holiday. Is your friend’s employer legally required to accommodate yourfriend’s religious beliefs?
Chapter 21 Solutions
MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Hong, who was born in Vietnam, now lives in Los Angeles. She applies to be a waitress at Hooters. The manager of Hooters restaurant tells her, “Sorry, we rarely hire Asian girls because their breasts are too small and part of the Hooters’ image is waitresses with big breasts”. Does Tran have a valid claim against Hooters under the Civil Rights Act? Explain.arrow_forwardSpotlight on Dress Code Policies—DiscriminationBased on Gender. Burlington Coat FactoryWarehouse, Inc., had a dress code that required malesalesclerks to wear business attire consisting of slacks,shirt, and a necktie. Female salesclerks, by contrast,were required to wear a smock so that customers could readilyidentify them. Karen O’Donnell and other female employeesrefused to wear smocks. Instead they reported to work in businessattire and were suspended. After numerous suspensions, thefemale employees were fired for violating Burlington’s dress codepolicy. All other conditions of employment, including salary,hours, and benefits, were the same for female and male employees. Was the dress code policy discriminatory? Why or why not?[O’Donnell v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., 656 F.Supp.263 (S.D. Ohio 1987)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.)arrow_forwardLaurie, a lesbian and French national, was hired as a flight attendant to work in United Airlines’ hub in Paris. Laurie was terminated at age 40. She sues United Airlines alleging employment discrimination on the basis of age, gender, and affinity orientation (the latter based on the Illinois Human Rights Act). The airline asks the court to dismiss Laurie’s action on the basis that she does not live in the U.S., so the employment protection laws do not apply to her. Will the court do so? Explain. [Rabé v. United Airlines, Inc. 2011 WL677946 (7th Cir. 2011).] What will the court do? Explain Utilize facts / law / precedent. Cite as appropriate 1 page should do.arrow_forward
- Sam, a mid-level manager at his company, continually makes offensive remarks and gestures toward Susan, a non-manager at the company who works in another department. Susan quits her job and brings a lawsuit for sexual harassment. As a general rule under California law, the company Group of answer choices a. is strictly liable to pay general damages for the sexually harassing acts of its managers. b. is not liable if Susan complained about the problem and the company took no corrective action. c. is liable for punitive damages even if senior management had not been made aware of the problem. d. none of the above.arrow_forwardLisa applied and interviewed for a manager position at her company and was not selected. She was not given any feedback from the interview, Tony her male coworker was selected for the position. Lisa felt the promotion was unfair, since she had more seniority than Tony, and decided to file a gender discrimination and play with her local equal opportunity commissioner the EEOC investigated the complaint, and did not find any evidence of discrimination. Both Lisa and Tony’s employment was in good standing however, Tony had passed managerial experience, which was listed as a requirement on the job. This aspect, then made him a strong, stronger candidate for the job than Lisa, who had more seniority, but lacked the experience and the next several months, Lisa noticed the change from her manager prior to the complaint being filled he was very personable towards her and often made small talk around the office. After the complaint he was very short with her, and did not engage in any small…arrow_forwardBob writes an email to the managing partner of the firm saying "I think we have enough women in the firm now". After receiving this email, the managing partner declines to hire Sally for an open accounting position. This email is considered pretext direct evidence of discrimination not evidence of discrimination circumstancial evidence of discriminationarrow_forward
- Robert, a 66-year-old man, saw an ad in the magazine for a cashier at a grocery shop (Food Grocery). The advertisement says: "Applicant for a cashier position must be young and energetic to possess excellent customer relations skills. Applicants who are selected would be required to stand for long periods of time and to lift 25-35 pounds. Robert contacted the EEC to institute a charge against Food Grocery. What type of discrimination does this advertisement include, if found? Explain Robert's reaction.arrow_forward3. What protection under human rights law does an individual have who has been denied employment based upon their weight? A) protection based on sex and physical disability B) no protection under human rights law, as being overweight is not a human rights provision C) protection based on physical disability, if it is medically diagnosed as a disability D) a BFOR can be easily established for most job positions that allow for discriminationarrow_forwardA cashier employed for 18 years ate a bag of potato chips without buying them while at work. She paid for the bag as soon as her shift ended. She was fired. The employee ate the chips because she was diabetic and was concerned that her blood sugar was getting too low. Later, the EEOC sued the employer on her behalf and claimed the employer discriminated against her because of her disability. Conduct some research and determine which of her human rights were violated. How should the employer have responded? Explain. write 250 wordsarrow_forward
- True or False 1. According to the employment at will principle, employers may dismiss their employees whenever they desire, for good or no cause, even for morally wrong causes. 2. Discrimination in employment must involve a decision against employees that is not based on individual merit. 3. Institutional discrimination is discrimination that is the result of the actions of all or many people in an institution and of their routine processes and policies.arrow_forwardFor each of the statements below, identify the protected ground where applicable. marital status colour 1. Awoman cannot find childcare to continue working overnight shifts, and her employer does not allow flexibility by scheduling her on day shifts. age not discriminatory religion 2. An employer requires all employees to have a valid driver's license. race 3. An employer has a policy requiring a person identifies themselves as either male or female. gender identity or expression 4. An employer assigns her employees to weekend shifts without recognizing that some employees observe the Sabbath and cannot sex sexual orientation work on those days. family status 5. No match national or ethnic origin disabilityarrow_forwardBusiness law disucssarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education