Concept explainers
Subpart (a):
The budget constraint and trade-off.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
When the wants and needs of a human are unlimited and the budget of an individual is limited, it will lead to a constraint of needs and this constraint raised is due to the limited budget is known as the budget constraint of an individual. Thus, the budget constraint is defined as the possible combination of goods and services that is purchased at a given
Here, the income of the person is given as $60, the price of one meal at dining hall is $6, and the price of cup 'o soup is $1.5. Thus, when the consumer spends her entire income on the meal in dining hall, the quantity that she receives can be calculated by dividing the income by the per meal price as follows:
Thus, when she spends all her income on meal from dining hall, she can buy 10 meals. When she spends all her income on the cup 'o soup meal, the quantity can be calculated by replacing the price of dining hall meal with that of cup 'o soup as follows:
Thus, when she spends all her income on the cup 'o soup meals, she can receive 40 cup 'o soup meals.
The budget constraint represents all the combinations of these two goods ranging between 10 dining hall meals and no cup 'o soup meal to no dining hall meals and 40 cup 'o soup meals. However in this case, the consumer spends her income equally on both of the commodities. Thus, she spends $30 each on dining hall meals and cup 'o soup meals. Thus, when the consumer spends $30 on the meal in dining hall, the quantity that she receives can be calculated by dividing the income by per meal price as follows:
Thus, when she spends $30 of her income on meal from dining hall, she can buy 5 meals. When she spends $30 of her income on the cup 'o soup meal, the quantity can be calculated by replacing the price of dining hall meal with that of cup 'o soup as follows:
Thus, when she spends $30 of her income on the cup 'o soup meals, she can receive 20 cup 'o soup meals. This will be the point of her consumption, when the income is equally spent on both commodities. The graphical representation shows this combination at point A and it is represented as follows:
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraint is defined as the possible combination of goods and services that is purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Normal good: The goods whose quantity demanded increases, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Inferior good: The goods whose quantity demanded falls, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Giffen goods: They are the special cases of inferior goods in which an income effect overweighs the substitution effect.
Subpart (b):
The budget constraint and trade-off.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
When the price of the cup o' soup increases to $2 from $1.5, the vertical intercept of the student's budget constraint will shift downwards; this will flatten the budget constraint curve. When she spends all her income on the cup 'o soup meal, the quantity can be calculated by replacing the price of dining hall meal with that of cup 'o soup as follows:
Thus, when she spends all her income on the cup 'o soup meals, she can only receive 30 cup 'o soup meals. This flattens the budget constraint curve.
It is also said that at present she only spends 30 percent of her income on the dining hall meal, which means that the income spent on dining hall meal is only $18 and that spend on cup o' soup is $42. At this income spending distribution, she can purchase 3 units of dining hall meals and 21 units of cup o' soup meals. This new point can be illustrated as point B and it can be represented as follows:
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraint is defined as the possible combination of goods and services that is purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Normal good: The goods whose quantity demanded increases, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Inferior good: The goods whose quantity demanded falls, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Giffen goods: They are the special cases of inferior goods in which an income effect overweighs the substitution effect.
Subpart (c):
The budget constraint and trade-off.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
The initial price of cup o' soup was $1.5, and the new price after the increase is $2. The initial quantity demanded of cup o' soup was 20 units; whereas after the increased price of the commodity, the quantity demanded is 21 units. This shows that the
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraint is defined as the possible combination of goods and services that is purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Normal good: The goods whose quantity demanded increases, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Inferior good: The goods whose quantity demanded falls, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Giffen goods: They are the special cases of inferior goods in which an income effect overweighs the substitution effect.
Subpart (d):
The budget constraint and trade-off.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
The initial price of cup o' soup was $1.5, and the new price after the increase is $2. The initial quantity demanded of cup o' soup was 20 units denoted by point A; whereas after the increased price of the commodity, the quantity demanded is 21 units denoted by point B. This shows that the demand for the commodity will increase, when the price of the commodity increases. Thus, these two points can be graphically illustrated as follows:
Here, the demand for the cup o' soup increases, when its price increases, which means that the commodity is an inferior good. However at the same time, the income effect overweighs the substitution effect for the commodity, which is a special case of inferior goods, known as the Giffen goods. Thus, the cup o' soup is a Giffen good.
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraint is defined as the possible combination of goods and services that is purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Normal good: The goods whose quantity demanded increases, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Inferior good: The goods whose quantity demanded falls, when the income of the consumer increases and vice versa.
Giffen goods: They are the special cases of inferior goods in which an income effect overweighs the substitution effect.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
MANKIW: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS
- Present a budget line and a budget set for the consumer of two good X and Y, where the consumer has an income of $3,000 per month. Assume the price of X is 2 and the price of Y is 6. Suppose the price of Y decreases to 4. Show how your budget line changes and use your diagram to explain why the price decrease will make the consumer better off. Add at least two indifference curves, using them to show how the decrease in price will change the optimal choice, assuming the law of demand holds for good Y.arrow_forwardPlease see below. I need help with this graph.arrow_forwardA college student has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for $6 per meal or eating a Cup 0'Soup for $1.50 per meal. Her weekly food budget is $60. a. Draw the budget constraint showing the trade-off between dining hall meals and Cups 0 'Soup. Assuming that she spends equal amounts on both goods, draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. b. Suppose the price of a Cup 0'Soup now rises to $2. Using your diagram from part (a), show the consequences of this change in price. Assume that our student now spends only 30 percent of her income on dining hall meals. Label the new optimum as point B. c.What happened to the quantity of Cups 0 'Soup consumed as a result of this price change? What does this result say about the income and substitution effects? Explain. d. Use points A and B to draw a demand curve for Cup 0 'Soup. What is this type of good called?arrow_forward
- Arthur spends his income on bread and chocolate. Chocolate is a good from which Arthur gets a positive amount of satisfaction, but he is neutral as far as bread is concerned, i.e. He doesn't care if he consumes bread or not. Consuming bread does not give him positive or negative satisfaction. Please draw one of Arthur’s indifference curves for bread and chocolate, measuring bread on the vertical axis and chocolate on the horizontal axis.arrow_forwardPlease Answer iv) A student living in a university hostel has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for Rs.600 per meal, or eating a meal at Dhaaba for Rs.150 per meal. His weekly food budget is Rs. 6000 Draw the budget constraint showing the trade-off between dining-hall meals and meals at Dhaaba. Assuming that he spends equal amounts on both goods, draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. Suppose the price of a Dhaaba meal now rises to Rs.200. Assume that our student now spends only 30 percent of his income on dining-hall meals. Label the new optimum as point B. iv) Use points A and B to draw a demand curve for meals at Dhaaba. What is this type of good called?arrow_forwardDraw YOUR indifference curve for the consumption of two goods (you pick the goods – be creative!) Make sure to include labels. Why did you choose these two goods? Why do you view these as being a tradeoff? Carefully explain why the indifference curve has the shape you created. (Hint: Discuss the slope. What it means and how it changes) Determine a budget that will be allocated towards your consumption of these two goods. Given the budget, prices for the goods, and your preferences, how will you find the utility-maximizing combination? Give an intuitive answer as well as a graphical answer (make sure to label the graph accordingly).arrow_forward
- The marginal utility for shoes and coffee is given below for five individuals. A pair of shoes costs $2, and a cup of coffee costs $1. Which of these consumers are optimizing over their choices? Explain For those who are not, how should they adjust their spending? Explain “Pasta is Miguel’s favorite meal therefore the law of diminishing marginal utility does not apply”. Do you agree with this statement? It is known that the indifference curve is convex. What does this tell you about the relationship between the goods? The income effect and the substitution effect work in the same direction for a normal good. Explain how this differs for an inferior good.arrow_forwardKevin likes going to the ballpark to watch baseball, and he also is fond of going to the theater to listen to the symphony orchestra. The following diagram shows two of Kevin's indifference curves for going to ballgames and symphonies. With Kevin's initial budget constraint (BC1), he chose to go to five symphonies and five baseball games per month (point X). Then his budget constraint shifted to BC2, and he chose to go to four symphonies and four ballgames per month (point Y). BALL GAMES 8 10 I I I I 4 5 SYMPHONIES BC BC B 10 Of the following choices, which could have shifted Kevin's budget constraint from BC₁ to BC2? Check all that apply. The price of symphony tickets increased while his income and the price of baseball tickets stayed the same. His income increased while the prices of baseball and symphony tickets stayed the same. The prices of both baseball and symphony tickets increased while his income stayed the same. His income decreased while the prices of baseball and symphony…arrow_forwardAlex has a monthly budget of $72 to spend on commuter train trips and organic pasta. Each train trip costs $12; each box of pasta costs $6. Alex's preferences for train travel and pasta are represented by the indifference map on the following page. a. Determine which line (L1, L2, L*, or L**) represents Alex's budget constraint. b. Find their utility-maximizing bundle (E1, E2, e*, or e**). How many train trips will Alex take? Suppose the state government establishes a program to subsidize public transportation for commuters, such that each train trip now costs Alex $6. c. Determine which line (L1, L2, L*, or L**) represents Alex's new budget constraint. d. Find their new utility-maximizing bundle (E1, E2, e*, or e**). Determine how many train trips Alex will now take. e. Find the size and direction (positive or negative) of the substitution effect for train trips. As part of your answer, state the starting quantity and ending quantity of train trips that represent this effect. f. Find…arrow_forward
- Picture 1 : A college student has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for $6 per meal, or eating a package of Cup O' Soup for $2 per meal. Her weekly food budget is $60. Assume that she spends equal amounts on both goods. On the following graph, use the green line (triangle symbol) to draw the college student's budget constraint. Then use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the initial optimum in this case. Picture 2 : Suppose the price of a Cup O' Soup now rises to $3. Assume that the student now spends only 20 percent of her income on dining hall meals. On the preceding graph, use the blue line (circle symbol) to draw the college student's new budget constraint. Then use the grey point (star symbol) to indicate the new optimum in this case. As a result of this price change, the quantity of Cup O' Soup packages consumed ( decreased , increase ) ? This means that Cup O' Soup must be (a normal , an inferior) ? good, and the income effect (…arrow_forwardSuppose you have $100 to spend on Skittles and M&Ms. The price of Skittles is $5.00 and the price of M&Msis $1.00.(a) Write the budget constraint and draw the budget constraint on a graph that has M&Ms on the verticalaxis. (b) Assuming you spend all of your money on skittles and M&Ms. If you bought 10 M&Ms how manySkittles did you purchase? (c) Suppose the price of skittles increases from $5.00 to $6.00. Rewrite the budget constrain and draw thenew budget line, including and indicating intercepts and the slopes. (d) Suppose the price of Skittles drops from $5.00 to $1.00. You are limited to only a maximum of 75skittles. Draw this new budget constraint on the same graph from your answers in part (a) and (c).arrow_forwardSuppose you have an income of $24 and the only two goods you consume are apples (x1) and peaches (x2). The price of apples is $4 and the price of peaches is $3. Suppose that your optimal consumption is 4 peaches and 3 apples. a. Illustrate this in a graph using indifference curves and budget lines. b. Now suppose that the price of apples falls to $2 and I take enough money away from you to make you as happy as you were originally. Will you buy more or fewer peaches? Provide a graphical representation.arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning