(a)
The change in total product as the marginal product changes.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
Marginal product can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the marginal product for variable unit 1.
The marginal product for variable unit 1 is 6.
Average product can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the average product for variable unit
1.
The average product for variable unit 1 is 6.
Total variable cost can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the total variable cost for variable unit 1.
The total variable cost for variable unit 1 is 1.
Average variable cost can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the average variable cost for variable unit 1.
The average variable cost for variable unit 1 is 1.
Total cost can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (5) to calculate the total cost for variable unit 1.
The total cost for variable unit 1 is 3.
Average total cost can be calculated using the following equation:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (6) to calculate the average total cost for variable unit 1.
The average total cost for variable unit 1 is 3.
Marginal cost can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (7) to calculate the marginal cost for variable unit 1.
The marginal cost for variable unit 1 is 1.
Table-1
Units of variable input |
Total product | Marginal product | Average product | Price of input |
Total variable cost |
Average Variable cost |
Total Fixed cost |
Total Cost | Average total cost |
Marginal cost |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
2 | 15 | 9 | 7.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
3 | 27 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1.66 | 1 |
4 | 37 | 10 | 9.25 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1.5 | 1 |
5 | 45 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1.4 | 1 |
6 | 50 | 5 | 8.33 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1.33 | 1 |
7 | 52 | 2 | 7.4 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1.28 | 1 |
8 | 50 | -2 | 6.25 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1.25 | 1 |
The total product of a firm decreases as its marginal product falls to negative. It is clear from Table-1 that the total product decreases from 52 to 50 as the marginal product falls from 2 to -2.
Total product: Total product refers to the total quantity of goods that is produced by a firm with available resources in a given period of time.
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an addition to the total product, as a result of employing an additional unit of variable factor.
(b)
The relation between average product and marginal product.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
When the marginal product is greater than the average product, the average product increases. In Table-1, the average product increases up to the point where, the marginal product is greater than the average product, after that it starts to decline.
(c)
The position of average product, when the marginal product is less than the average product.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
When the marginal product is less than the average cost, the average cost begins to fall. In Table-1, a fall in marginal product from 10 to 8 leads to a corresponding fall in the average product from 9.25 to 9.
(d)
The point at which marginal product begins to decrease.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
When the average product reaches the maximum point, the marginal product begins to fall. It can be seen from Table 1, where the marginal product falls from 12 to 10 as the average product increases from 9 to 9.25.
(e)
The point at which the marginal cost begins to increase.
(e)
Explanation of Solution
In Table 1, the marginal cost is same for all units of variable inputs. This is because the input price is same for all units of production.
Marginal cost: Marginal cost refers to an addition to the total cost by employing an extra unit of worker or producing an extra unit of product.
(f)
The relationship between marginal product and marginal cost.
(f)
Explanation of Solution
Marginal product refers to an addition to the total product by employing an extra unit of input or worker. The marginal cost also refers to an addition to the total cost by producing an extra unit of output. These marginal product and marginal costs are inversely related and this relationship works on the basis of the law of diminishing returns. Marginal product initially rises and reaches at the maximum and then begins to decrease. Correspondingly, the marginal cost initially declines then reaches to a minimum point and then begins to rise. The maximum point of marginal product is corresponding to the minimum point of marginal cost.
(g)
Change in the marginal cost as the total product declines.
(g)
Explanation of Solution
Usually, the marginal cost increases when the total product begins to fall. In Table 1, the marginal cost is same for all units of inputs, where the input price is same for all units of variable factor.
(h)
The relationship between
(h)
Explanation of Solution
Marginal cost and average variable cost equals at the minimum of average variable cost. After that the average variable cost begins to rise.
Average variable cost: Average variable cost refers to the total cost as per unit of variable input.
(i)
At what level of output marginal cost and average variable cost will be equal.
(i)
Explanation of Solution
Table 1 shows that the marginal cost equals the average variable cost at all levels of output.
(j)
The relationship between
(j)
Explanation of Solution
When, the average total cost equals the marginal costs, then the average total cost begins to rise. This is because the marginal cost equals the average cost when the average cost reaches at its minimum point.
Average total cost: Average total cost refers to the total cost as per the unit of output produced.
(k)
At what level of output the marginal cost equals the average total cost.
(k)
Explanation of Solution
Marginal product does not equal the average total cost until employing 8 units of variable inputs.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Economics: Private and Public Choice
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning