Whether as extreme poverty declines, growth by itself tends to be less successful at lifting additional people out of poverty.
Explanation of Solution
The assessment seems to be accurate because this is what seems to be happening in the developing and underdeveloped countries in the world. The underdeveloped as well as the developing countries that are commonly known as the third-world countries are trying to increase
The idea was very successful in its initial stages, but after a certain level, the additional impact by the economic resources to reduce poverty and increase economic growth started to decline. This is because the impact was not equal to the initial stage impacts. This means that the
Poverty: Poverty is the lack of a certain minimum amount of money that is required to live a healthy life by an individual.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (12th Edition)
- The Importance of Productivity Two well-known economists, William Baumol and Alan Blinder, have stated that, in the long run, “nothing contributes more to reduction of poverty, to increases in leisure, and to the country’s ability to finance education, public health, environmental improvement and the arts” (1991, 356) than the rate of growth of productivity. 1. Define productivity. 2. See if you can verify Baumol and Blinder’s very strong claim (“nothing contributes more ...”) through the following exercise. Assume GDP in the United States is $10 trillion and that the labor force remains constant in size and fully employed. Estimate the value of GDP in one year’s time if productivity growth is 3%. What if it were only 2%? How much will GDP fall in two years’ time if productivity growth remains at 2% rather than 3%? In three years? 3. Why might environmental regulation reduce productivity growth? 4. Why might it increase…arrow_forwardBased off of the article, what three poverty traps help explain the plight of nations comprising the poorest billion people? Explain in 10 sentences min. Article: The Poorest Billion Not long ago, the world was one-sixth rich and five-sixths poor. Now, thanks to impressive growth in places like China, the world is more like one-sixth rich, two-thirds not rich but improving, and one-sixth poor and going nowhere. Most developing economies are experiencing a rising standard of living. But that still leaves about a billion people trapped in economies that are not only extremely poor, but stagnant or getting worse. All told, about 45 countries fit into this poorest-billion category, including 30 countries in sub-Saharan Africa plus the likes of Cambodia, Haiti, Laos, Myanmar, North Korea, and Yemen. Economist Paul Collier, of Oxford University in England, has examined what went wrong with these “trapped countries.” Based on decades of research, he identifies some poverty traps. About 750…arrow_forwardA key theme of criticism of globalization is that it seems to unfairly reward the rich and punish the poor. One way to think about this is to look at the issue of income inequality. Technically, income inequality is the unequal distribution of household or individual income across the various participants in an economy. Income inequality is often presented as the percentage of income to a percentage of population. For example, a statistic may indicate that 70% of a country's income is controlled by 20% of that country's residents. Work on income inequality in the USA shows the change in income between 1980 and 2014 for every point on the distribution of people in terms of income percentile that is, we can track the changing distribution of income, from the poorest person to the richest person over that time span. As seen in the chart below, it’s mostly flat and close to zero, before spiking upward at the end—as such, some say it resembles a classic hockey-stick graph. Based on this…arrow_forward
- Billions of people in the world make two dollars a day or less. In fact, a billion people make less than one dollar a day. In such places, a loan of $100 or $200 makes a huge difference. That's where microloans from organizations such as Opportunity International come in. Opportunity International is an organization that grants microloans to people, mostly women, in developing countries so they can invest in a business. Those investments often lead to community growth and employment, and help the owners, themselves, to prosper on a moderate scale. The borrowers must pay back the money with interest—when they do, they can borrow more and keep growing. Opportunity International, unlike some other microlending organizations, also provides a banking function where entrepreneurs can safely put their money. They can also buy some insurance to protect themselves against loss. Opportunity International helps over a million people in over 28 countries, giving them the opportunity to change…arrow_forwardThe following table shows levels of real income per person in several economies during the years 1960 and 2010. The table further shows the average annual growth rate for each economy over this time period. For instance, real income per person in Senegal was $1,567 in 1960, and it actually declined to $1,480 by 2010. Senegal's average annual growth rate during this period was -0.11%, and it featured the lowest level of real income per person of any economy listed in the table in the year 2010. The levels of real income per person are reported in U.S. dollars using a base year of 2005. The following exercises will provide insight into the different growth experiences of these nations. Questions: 1. This economy experienced the fastest rate of growth in real income per person from 1960 to 2010. a. Austria b. China c. France d. India e. Senegal f. Singapore 2. This economy had the highest level of real income per person in the year 2010. a. Austria b. China c. France d. India e.…arrow_forwardAn IAC (industrially advanced country) had a per capita income of $28,200, while a DVC (developing country) had a per capita income of $1,200 in a given year. If both countries experience a per-capita-income growth of 5 percent, then the per-capita-income gap one year later will be $28,350. $29,400. $27,000. $350.arrow_forward
- In the 1990s, developed countries agreed to double their aid to Africa by 2015. A report by the United Nations conference on Trade and Development noted that sceptics had raised concerns about how much effect the doubling of aid would have on output and incomes in Africa, if the quantity of other inputs such as human capacity and institutions were to remain fixed. It also pointed to the divisions between the sceptics with some suggesting the return would diminish when aid reached only 4% of GDP, while others thought they would diminish only when it had reached 50%. It should be added that even if the returns do begin to diminish, they could still be very important.In 1887, Cecil Rhodes created the De Beers Consolidated mines Company, which controlled about 90% of the total world supply of rough uncut diamonds with its South African mines. Until 2001, De Beers produced about half of the world’s diamonds in its mines and marketed about 80% of the world’s diamonds. Diamond producing…arrow_forwardWhat is the main objective of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United nations? What is the standard response to eradicating poverty? Why must we change our paradigm of growth and consumption to that of "de-development"? Why are the terms de-development, de-growth, and zero growth seemingly unacceptable to the usual framework of human progress?arrow_forwardMention two factors which cause the rapid growth in population in South Africaarrow_forward
- The red budget line depicts China in 1980 before there was any Communist Party policy about the number of children a Chinese woman could choose to have. Between 1980 and 2020, Chinese wages and GDP per capita (income) increased due to the abandonment of a Communist/Socialist economic system and a partial movement toward a free market capitalist system. The rotation from the red to the blue budget line depicts higher wages and the increased GDP per capita that resulted. China's One Child Policy All Other Goods (Income) 15K IC6 4K IC, 2020 IC3 1980 8. 1 4 Children (Fertility Rate)arrow_forwardThe following table shows levels of real income per person in several economies during the years 1960 and 2010. The table further shows the average annual growth rate for each economy over this time period. For instance, real income per person in Niger was $945 in 1960, and it actually declined to $570 by 2010. Niger's average annual growth rate during this period was -1.01%, and it featured the lowest level of real income per person of any economy listed in the table in the year 2010. The levels of real income per person are reported in U.S. dollars using a base year of 2005. The following exercises will provide insight into the different growth experiences of these nations. Economy Canada United Kingdom Korea Hong Kong Guatemala Niger Indicate which economy satisfies each of the following statements. Statement This economy experienced the fastest rate of growth in real income per person from 1960 to 2010. Real Income per Person in 1960 Real Income per Person in 2010 (Dollars)…arrow_forwardSuppose there are only two small countries in the world: Ascot, with a population of 30,000 people, and Delwich, with a population of 20,000 people. Ascot’s GDP is equal to $150 million, while Delwich’s GDP is $250 million. Delwich’s GNP has been estimated to be equal to $280 million. Use this information to calculate Ascot’s GNP, the GDP per capita in Ascot, and the GNP per capita in Delwich.arrow_forward
- Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning