Figure 20.35 shows a thin, uniformly charged disk of radius R . Imagine the disk divided into rings of varying radii r , as suggested in the figure, (a) Show that the area of such a ring is very nearly 2 πrdr . (b) If the disk carries surface charge density σ use the result of part (a) to write an expression for the charge d on an infinitesimal ring, (c) Use the result of (b) along with the result of Example 20.6 to write the infinitesimal electric field dE of this ring at a point on the disk axis, taken to be the positive x -axis. (d) Integrate over all such rings to show that the net electric field on the axis has magnitude E = 2 π k σ ( 1 − x x 2 + R 2 ) FIGURE 20.35 Problem 73
Figure 20.35 shows a thin, uniformly charged disk of radius R . Imagine the disk divided into rings of varying radii r , as suggested in the figure, (a) Show that the area of such a ring is very nearly 2 πrdr . (b) If the disk carries surface charge density σ use the result of part (a) to write an expression for the charge d on an infinitesimal ring, (c) Use the result of (b) along with the result of Example 20.6 to write the infinitesimal electric field dE of this ring at a point on the disk axis, taken to be the positive x -axis. (d) Integrate over all such rings to show that the net electric field on the axis has magnitude E = 2 π k σ ( 1 − x x 2 + R 2 ) FIGURE 20.35 Problem 73
Figure 20.35 shows a thin, uniformly charged disk of radius R. Imagine the disk divided into rings of varying radii r, as suggested in the figure, (a) Show that the area of such a ring is very nearly 2πrdr. (b) If the disk carries surface charge density σ use the result of part (a) to write an expression for the charge d on an infinitesimal ring, (c) Use the result of (b) along with the result of Example 20.6 to write the infinitesimal electric field dE of this ring at a point on the disk axis, taken to be the positive x-axis. (d) Integrate over all such rings to show that the net electric field on the axis has magnitude
Paraxial design of a field flattener. Imagine your optical system has Petzal curvature of the field with radius
p. In Module 1 of Course 1, a homework problem asked you to derive the paraxial focus shift along the axis
when a slab of glass was inserted in a converging cone of rays. Find or re-derive that result, then use it to
calculate the paraxial radius of curvature of a field flattener of refractive index n that will correct the observed
Petzval. Assume that the side of the flattener facing the image plane is plano. What is the required radius of
the plano-convex field flattener? (p written as rho )
3.37(a) Five free electrons exist in a three-dimensional infinite potential well with all three widths equal to \( a = 12 \, \text{Å} \). Determine the Fermi energy level at \( T = 0 \, \text{K} \). (b) Repeat part (a) for 13 electrons.
Book: Semiconductor Physics and Devices 4th ed, NeamanChapter-3Please expert answer only. don't give gpt-generated answers, & please clear the concept of quantum states for determining nx, ny, nz to determine E, as I don't have much idea about that topic.
3.37(a) Five free electrons exist in a three-dimensional infinite potential well with all three widths equal to \( a = 12 \, \text{Å} \). Determine the Fermi energy level at \( T = 0 \, \text{K} \). (b) Repeat part (a) for 13 electrons.
Book: Semiconductor Physics and Devices 4th ed, NeamanChapter-3Please expert answer only. don't give gpt-generated answers, & please clear the concept of quantum states for determining nx, ny, nz to determine E, as I don't have much idea about that topic.
Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach (8th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.