AUDITING LL W/ CONNECT <C>
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781307416268
Author: MESSIER
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 20.19MCQ
To determine
Concept Introduction:
In general, investors invest in shares of the company after analyzing the financial statements of a company. It is not the liability of investors to check the misstatement in financial statements. Investors can believe in the audited financial statements. If the financial statements include material omission which caused loss to investor, the investor can sue the auditor and company in the court of law for the loss suffered to him.
To choose:The option that plaintiff must prove in the court of law regarding misstatements of financial statements.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
While conducting an audit, Larson Associates, CPAs, failed to detect material misstatements included in its client's financial statements. Larson's unqualified opinion was included with the financial statements in a registration statement and prospectus for a public offering of securities made by the client. Larson knew that its opinion and the financial statements would be used for this purpose. Which of the following statements is correct with regard to a suit against Larson and the client by a purchaser of the securities under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933?
Larson will not be liable if the purchaser did not rely on the financial statements.
Larson will not be liable if it had reasonable grounds to believe the financial statements were accurate.
The purchaser must prove that Larson knew of the material misstatements.
The purchaser must prove that Larson failed to conduct the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors.
Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss.
Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors.
Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss.
If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…
Chapter 20 Solutions
AUDITING LL W/ CONNECT <C>
Ch. 20 - Prob. 20.1RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.2RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.3RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.4RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.5RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.6RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.7RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.8RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.9RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.10RQ
Ch. 20 - Prob. 20.11RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.12RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.13RQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.14MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.15MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.16MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.17MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.18MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.19MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.20MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.21MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.22MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.23MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.24MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.25MCQCh. 20 - Prob. 20.26PCh. 20 - Prob. 20.27PCh. 20 - Prob. 20.28PCh. 20 - Prob. 20.29P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forwardAnalyze each of the following situations below and provide your assessment of the potential resolution of each scenario, including potential liability for the auditor or audit firm involved. Yasmeen CPA is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging that she should be held liable for gross negligence for a fraud involving the valuation of securities included in the financial statements of one of his clients. Yasmeen was uncertain how to establish a correct valuation for the securities and decided to rely on the price estimation supplied by management. A lawsuit has been filed against Elena CPA, charging here with constructive fraud in the audit of Broughton Company’s financial statements. Elena has examined all the audit documentation in his files and reviewed all relevant auditing standards. She is convinced that his audit fully complies with standards of the profession but is uncertain what he should use as his primary defense tactic. Canon Film filed for a bankruptcy in January 2012. A…arrow_forwardWhen investors sue auditors for damages under section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933,they must allege and provea. Scienter on the part of auditors.b. The audited financial statements contained a material misstatement.c. They relied on the materially misstated financial statements.d. Their reliance on the materially misstated financial statements was the direct cause oftheir loss.arrow_forward
- Select the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following statements.arrow_forwardUnknown to the other four proponents, Enrico (who had been given the task of attending to the Articles of Incorporation of the proposed corporation, Auto Mo,AyosKo) misappropriated the filing fees and never filed the Articles of Incorporation with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (SEC). Instead, he prepared and presented to the proposed incorporators a falsified SEC certificate approving the Articles. Relying on the falsified SEC certificate, the latter began assuming and discharging corporate powers. . Auto Mo, Ayos Ko is a __________. a. de jure corporation b. de facto corporation c. corporation by estoppel d. general partnershiparrow_forwardWhich of the following would be the auditors’ most likely defense in an action broughtunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?a. The investor did not have privity with auditors.b. The investor did not suffer a loss based on the materially misstated financial statements.c. The auditors acted in good faith and were not aware of the materially misstated financialstatements.d. The financial statements were not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionarrow_forward
- The following pertains to auditor legal liability standards under the PSLRA:a. The Reform Act requires that, in any private securities fraud action in which the plaintiff is alleging a misleading statement or omission on the part of the defendant, “the complaint shall specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, the complaint shall state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.”90Do you believe this standard better protects auditors from legal liability than the standards which existed before the PSLRA? Explain.b. Do you believe the change in standards for auditors’ liability under the PSLRA from joint-and-several to proportional liability was a good thing? Explain.arrow_forwardConsider section 24 of the Securities Act of 1933 and section 32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (see Module C). Based on the case information, do you believe that Madoff’s auditor, Friehling, should be facing criminal charges? Why or why not?arrow_forwardNixon & Co., CPAs, issued an unmodified opinion on the 2015 financial statements of Madison Corp. These financial statements were included in Madison’s annual report and Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Nixon did not detect material misstatements in the financial statements as a result of negligence in the performance of the audit. Based upon the financial statements, Harry Corp. purchased stock in Madison. Shortly thereafter, Madison became insolvent, causing the price of the stock to decline drastically. Harry has commenced legal action against Nixon for damages based upon Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. What would be Nixon’s best defense to such an action? Explain.arrow_forward
- An investor seeking to recover stock market losses from a CPA firm associated with aninitial offering of securities based on an unmodified opinion on financial statements thataccompanied a registration statement must establish thata. The audited financial statements contain a false statement or omission of material fact.b. The investor relied on the financial statements.c. The CPA firm did not act in good faith.d. The CPA firm would have discovered the false statement or omission if it had exerciseddue care in its examination.arrow_forwardAn audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: c. The lawyer stated that there is a reasonable possibility that the client will lose. The client disclosed this situation, but did not accrue a loss.arrow_forwardThe Securities and Exchange Commission denied the amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of Corporation B because it found out the corporation will be used as a drug den. What is the definite ground of disapproval of the amendment? a. The certification concerning the amount of capital stock subscribed and/ or paid is false. b. The purpose/s are patently unconstitutional, illegal, immoral or contrary to government rules and regulations. c. Not substantially in accordance with the Code. d. The required percentage of Filipino ownership of the capital stock under existing laws or Constitution has not been complied with.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage