(a)
Definition and assumption leads to prisoner’s dilemma.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
The prisoner’s dilemma is the game between two persons that illustrate why cooperative behaviour is difficult to maintain. In this case, both persons will take a strategy to maintain their interests. This is based on some assumptions that are listed as follows:
- 1) Each player act to fulfil their interest.
- 2) No communication between the prisoners’.
- 3) No binding agreements.
(b)
The possibility of escaping the prisoner’s dilemma.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
A binding agreement or trusting each other are the main method to escape from the prisoner’s dilemma. If one firm is ready to take his strategy without worsening the other, this will create a possibility to escape them from the dilemma.
(c)
The opinion of standard model and experiment economy to Answer b.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
According to the standard model, the firms will not trust the other one and they do only for their interest and better off. Thus, there is a possibility of cheating when the game is played by two firms. Experimental economists argue this and they say that the firms will take their decisions only after considering the effects on other firms too.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Microeconomics
- In game theory, what does the term "payoff" refer to? a) The amount of money each player has at the beginning of the game. b) The final outcome of the game. c) The utility or benefit that a player receives based on the outcome of the game. d) The number of strategies available to each player.arrow_forwardEconomics Game theory: Consider a collective action game with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number of participants in the joint project is n, each individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of C(n) = 32 – 2n. Please answer the questions I am asking! 1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and unstable ones. 2. Find the socially optimal outcome. 3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially optimal. Explain your answer.arrow_forwardUsing game theory what are some examples in where Nash equilibrium is incorporated?arrow_forward
- Give one example each to the following statements. Explain your answer. A. A Nash Equilibrium may not be Pareto Efficient. B. There exist mechanisms to induce cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. C. The pursuit of self-interest without regard for others sometimes leads to outcomes that are socially desirable.arrow_forwardIt's a game theory bargaining game problem. I'm not familiar with cursive writing.arrow_forwardQ2. The Prisoners' Dilemma: Jill Confess Remain Silent Confess Bob: 8 years Jill: 8 years Bob: Free Jill: 20 years Bob Remain Silent Bob: 20 years Jill: Free Bob: 1 year Jill: 1 year 2A: Find Nash equilibrium? 28. Is the Nash equilibrium best outcome for them? 2C. If your answer of Q2 is 'No', then why they choose an outcome which is not best for them.arrow_forward
- What is the Nash Equilibrium in a game? A. A situation where all players cooperate for maximum gain B. A situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy unilaterally C. A situation where players always choose the same strategy D. A situation where players randomly select strategiesarrow_forwardGive an example of a strategic game in which at the Nash equilibrium players play lotteries. Define the game and explain the logic that leads to the equilibrium choices.arrow_forwardWhat is game theory? How does it relate to strategic decision making? What do the phrases dominant strategy and Nash Equilibrium mean as they apply to game theory?arrow_forward
- You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.arrow_forwardThe game, "the battle of the sexes" (discussed in class) has pure strategy Nash Equilibria and mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium (again in numbers). Of these 3 strategy, are pareto efficient. true or false?arrow_forwardAnswer all the questions, show all the working. Consider the following game in normal form. Not cooperate Cooperate Not cooperate 20,20 50,0 Cooperate 0,50 40,40 What is Nash equilibrium? Is it efficient? Why? What needs to be complied with so that the players would like to cooperate? What happens when one of the players does not cooperate? Why? Define trigger strategy. Calculate the discount factor (δ) that would make both players decide to cooperate.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education