a.
Find the expected monetary value for each decision.
a.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information, the probabilities for the state of nature are
Then, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
b.
Give the recommended decision.
b.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The decision neither would be recommended.
Explanation of Solution
The expected monetary value for the decision both is greater when compared to the other decisions. But, the risk of loss is minimum for the decision neither. Then, the recommended decision is neither.
Thus, the decision neither would be recommended.
c.
Construct an opportunity loss table.
c.

Answer to Problem 11CE
An opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity loss table is obtained as follows:
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | |||
Product 1 only | |||
Product 2 only | |||
Both |
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 125 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $125 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 105 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $105 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 220 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 65 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $65 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 60 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $60 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 110 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 40 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
d.
Find the expected opportunity loss for each decision.
d.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information,
From the part c, the opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Then, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
e.
Find the
e.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected value of perfect information is –6.
Explanation of Solution
The expected value of perfect information is obtained by taking the difference between the expected value under conditions of certainty and expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
From the opportunity loss table in the part c, in the state of nature
Thus, these are taken as the decisions.
The expected value under conditions of certainty is calculated as follows:
State of Nature | Decision | Payoff | Probability | Expected payoff |
Both | 200 | 0.30 | ||
Both | 110 | 0.50 | ||
Both | 40 | 0.20 |
Then, the expected value under conditions of certainty is obtained by adding 60, 55 and 8. That is,
Thus, the expected value under conditions of certainty is $123.
From the part d, the decision both is recommended, because its expected opportunity loss is less when compared to other decisions. From the part a, it’s expected payoff value is $129. This is the expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
The expected value of perfect information is
Thus, the expected value of perfect information is –6.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR BUSINESS AND
- Suppose we wish to test the hypothesis that women with a sister’s history of breast cancer are at higher risk of developing breast cancer themselves. Suppose we assume that the prevalence rate of breast cancer is 3% among 60- to 64-year-old U.S. women, whereas it is 5% among women with a sister history. We propose to interview 400 women 40 to 64 years of age with a sister history of the disease. What is the power of such a study assuming that the level of significance is 10%? I only need help writing the null and alternative hypotheses.arrow_forward4.96 The breaking strengths for 1-foot-square samples of a particular synthetic fabric are approximately normally distributed with a mean of 2,250 pounds per square inch (psi) and a standard deviation of 10.2 psi. Find the probability of selecting a 1-foot-square sample of material at random that on testing would have a breaking strength in excess of 2,265 psi.4.97 Refer to Exercise 4.96. Suppose that a new synthetic fabric has been developed that may have a different mean breaking strength. A random sample of 15 1-foot sections is obtained, and each section is tested for breaking strength. If we assume that the population standard deviation for the new fabric is identical to that for the old fabric, describe the sampling distribution forybased on random samples of 15 1-foot sections of new fabricarrow_forwardUne Entreprise œuvrant dans le domaine du multividéo donne l'opportunité à ses programmeurs-analystes d'évaluer la performance des cadres supérieurs. Voici les résultats obtenues (sur une échelle de 10 à 50) où 50 représentent une excellente performance. 10 programmeurs furent sélectionnés au hazard pour évaluer deux cadres. Un rapport Excel est également fourni. Programmeurs Cadre A Cadre B 1 34 36 2 32 34 3 18 19 33 38 19 21 21 23 7 35 34 8 20 20 9 34 34 10 36 34 Test d'égalité des espérances: observations pairéesarrow_forward
- A television news channel samples 25 gas stations from its local area and uses the results to estimate the average gas price for the state. What’s wrong with its margin of error?arrow_forwardYou’re fed up with keeping Fido locked inside, so you conduct a mail survey to find out people’s opinions on the new dog barking ordinance in a certain city. Of the 10,000 people who receive surveys, 1,000 respond, and only 80 are in favor of it. You calculate the margin of error to be 1.2 percent. Explain why this reported margin of error is misleading.arrow_forwardYou find out that the dietary scale you use each day is off by a factor of 2 ounces (over — at least that’s what you say!). The margin of error for your scale was plus or minus 0.5 ounces before you found this out. What’s the margin of error now?arrow_forward
- Suppose that Sue and Bill each make a confidence interval out of the same data set, but Sue wants a confidence level of 80 percent compared to Bill’s 90 percent. How do their margins of error compare?arrow_forwardSuppose that you conduct a study twice, and the second time you use four times as many people as you did the first time. How does the change affect your margin of error? (Assume the other components remain constant.)arrow_forwardOut of a sample of 200 babysitters, 70 percent are girls, and 30 percent are guys. What’s the margin of error for the percentage of female babysitters? Assume 95 percent confidence.What’s the margin of error for the percentage of male babysitters? Assume 95 percent confidence.arrow_forward
- You sample 100 fish in Pond A at the fish hatchery and find that they average 5.5 inches with a standard deviation of 1 inch. Your sample of 100 fish from Pond B has the same mean, but the standard deviation is 2 inches. How do the margins of error compare? (Assume the confidence levels are the same.)arrow_forwardA survey of 1,000 dental patients produces 450 people who floss their teeth adequately. What’s the margin of error for this result? Assume 90 percent confidence.arrow_forwardThe annual aggregate claim amount of an insurer follows a compound Poisson distribution with parameter 1,000. Individual claim amounts follow a Gamma distribution with shape parameter a = 750 and rate parameter λ = 0.25. 1. Generate 20,000 simulated aggregate claim values for the insurer, using a random number generator seed of 955.Display the first five simulated claim values in your answer script using the R function head(). 2. Plot the empirical density function of the simulated aggregate claim values from Question 1, setting the x-axis range from 2,600,000 to 3,300,000 and the y-axis range from 0 to 0.0000045. 3. Suggest a suitable distribution, including its parameters, that approximates the simulated aggregate claim values from Question 1. 4. Generate 20,000 values from your suggested distribution in Question 3 using a random number generator seed of 955. Use the R function head() to display the first five generated values in your answer script. 5. Plot the empirical density…arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,




