
a.
Find the expected monetary value for each decision.
a.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information, the probabilities for the state of nature are
Then, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
b.
Give the recommended decision.
b.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The decision neither would be recommended.
Explanation of Solution
The expected monetary value for the decision both is greater when compared to the other decisions. But, the risk of loss is minimum for the decision neither. Then, the recommended decision is neither.
Thus, the decision neither would be recommended.
c.
Construct an opportunity loss table.
c.

Answer to Problem 11CE
An opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity loss table is obtained as follows:
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | |||
Product 1 only | |||
Product 2 only | |||
Both |
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 125 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $125 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 105 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $105 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 220 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 65 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $65 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 60 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $60 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 110 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 40 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
d.
Find the expected opportunity loss for each decision.
d.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information,
From the part c, the opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Then, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
e.
Find the
e.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected value of perfect information is –6.
Explanation of Solution
The expected value of perfect information is obtained by taking the difference between the expected value under conditions of certainty and expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
From the opportunity loss table in the part c, in the state of nature
Thus, these are taken as the decisions.
The expected value under conditions of certainty is calculated as follows:
State of Nature | Decision | Payoff | Probability | Expected payoff |
Both | 200 | 0.30 | ||
Both | 110 | 0.50 | ||
Both | 40 | 0.20 |
Then, the expected value under conditions of certainty is obtained by adding 60, 55 and 8. That is,
Thus, the expected value under conditions of certainty is $123.
From the part d, the decision both is recommended, because its expected opportunity loss is less when compared to other decisions. From the part a, it’s expected payoff value is $129. This is the expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
The expected value of perfect information is
Thus, the expected value of perfect information is –6.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
- According to flightstats.com, American Airlines flights from Dallas to Chicago are on time 80% of the time. Suppose 10 flights are randomly selected, and the number of on-time flights is recorded. (a) Explain why this is a binomial experiment. (b) Determine the values of n and p. (c) Find and interpret the probability that exactly 6 flights are on time. (d) Find and interpret the probability that fewer than 6 flights are on time. (e) Find and interpret the probability that at least 6 flights are on time. (f) Find and interpret the probability that between 4 and 6 flights, inclusive, are on time.arrow_forwardShow how you get critical values of 1.65, -1.65, and $1.96 for a right-tailed, left- tailed, and two-tailed hypothesis test (use a = 0.05 and assume a large sample size).arrow_forwardSuppose that a sports reporter claims the average football game lasts 3 hours, and you believe it's more than that. Your random sample of 35 games has an average time of 3.25 hours. Assume that the population standard deviation is 1 hour. Use a = 0.05. What do you conclude?arrow_forward
- Suppose that a pizza place claims its average pizza delivery time is 30 minutes, but you believe it takes longer than that. Your sample of 10 pizzas has an average delivery time of 40 minutes. Assume that the population standard deviation is 15 minutes and the times have a normal distribution. Use a = 0.05. a. What are your null and alternative hypotheses? b. What is the critical value? c. What is the test statistic? d. What is the conclusion?arrow_forwardTable 5: Measurement Data for Question 9 Part Number Op-1, M-1 Op-1, M-2 | Op-2, M-1 Op-2, M-2 | Op-3, M-1 Op-3, M-2 1 21 20 20 20 19 21 2 24 23 24 24 23 24 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 21 12 8222332 201 21 20 22 20 22 27 27 28 26 27 28 19 18 19 21 24 21 22 19 17 18 24 23 25 25 23 26 20 20 18 19 17 13 23 25 25 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 18 18 21 21 23 22 24 22 20 19 23 24 25 24 20 21 19 18 25 25 14 24 24 23 25 24 15 29 30 30 28 31 16 26 26 25 26 25 17 20 20 19 20 20 843882388 20 18 25 20 19 25 25 30 27 20 18 19 21 19 19 21 23 19 25 26 25 24 25 25 20 19 19 18 17 19 17 Question 9 A measurement systems experiment involving 20 parts, three operators (Op-1, Op-2, Op-3), and two measure- ments (M-1, M-2) per part is shown in Table 5. (a) Estimate the repeatability and reproducibility of the gauge. (b) What is the estimate of total gauge variability?" (c) If the product specifications are at LSL = 6 and USL 60, what can you say about gauge capability?arrow_forwardQuestion 5 A fraction nonconforming control chart with center line 0.10, UCL = 0.19, and LCL = 0.01 is used to control a process. (a) If three-sigma limits are used, find the sample size for the control charte 2 (b) Use the Poisson approximation to the binomial to find the probability of type I error. (c) Use the Poisson approximation to the binomial to find the probability of type II error if the process fraction defective is actually p = 0.20.arrow_forward
- Question 8 Ten parts are measured three times by the same operator in a gauge capability study. The data are shown in Table 4. (a) Describe the measurement error that results from the use of this gauge. I (b) Estimate total variability and product variability. (c) What percentage of total variability is due to the gauge? (d) If specifications on the part are at 100±15, find the P/T ratio for this gauge. Comment on the adequacy of the gauge. 3 Table 4: Measurement Data for Question 8 Part Number Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 1 2 100 95 101 100 93 97 3 101 103 100 4 96 95 97 5 98 98 96 6 99 98 98 7889 95 97 98 100 99 98 100 100 97 10 100 98 98 99arrow_forwardQuestion 6 The data shown in Table 3 are and R values for 24 samples of size n = 5 taken from a process producing bearings. The measurements are made on the inside diameter of the bearing, with only the last three decimals recorded (i.e., 34.5 should be 0.50345). Perform a process capability analysis using and R charts for the data from Table 3. Table 3: Data for Question 6 Sample Number R | Sample Number I Ꭱ 1 34.5 3 13 35.4 8 2 34.2 4 14 34.0 6 ∞∞ 31.6 15 37.1 5 4 31.5 4 16 34.9 7 56789 35.0 5 17 33.5 4 34.1 6 18 31.7 3 32.6 4 19 34.0 8 33.8 3 20 35.1 4 34.8 7 10 33.6 8 11 31.9 3 12 38.6 9 2232 21 33.7 2 32.8 1 33.5 24 34.2 2 32 3arrow_forwardQuestion 1 The commercial loan operation of a financial institution has a standard for processing new loan applications in 24 hours. Table 1 shows the number of applications processed each day for the last 20 days and the number of applications that required more than 24 hours to complete. Table 1: Loan Application Data for Question 1 Day Applications Late Day Applications Late 1 200 3 11 219 0 2 250 4 12 238 10 3 240 2 13 250 4 4 300 5 14 302 6 5 200 2 15 219 20 6 250 4 16 246 3 7 246 3 17 251 6 8 258 5 18 273 7 9 275 2 19 245 3 10 274 1 20 260 (a) Set up the fraction nonconforming control chart for this process. Use the variable-width control limit approach. Plot the preliminary data in Table 1 on the chart. Is the process in statistical control? (b) Assume that assignable causes can be found for any out-of-control points on this chart. What center line should be used for process monitoring in the next period, and how should the control limits be calculated?arrow_forward
- help me with ab please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answerarrow_forwardhelp me with ab please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answerarrow_forwardhelp me with abcd please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answerarrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,




