![Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781260152647/9781260152647_largeCoverImage.gif)
a.
Find the expected monetary value for each decision.
a.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information, the probabilities for the state of nature are
Then, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
b.
Give the recommended decision.
b.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 11CE
The decision neither would be recommended.
Explanation of Solution
The expected monetary value for the decision both is greater when compared to the other decisions. But, the risk of loss is minimum for the decision neither. Then, the recommended decision is neither.
Thus, the decision neither would be recommended.
c.
Construct an opportunity loss table.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 11CE
An opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity loss table is obtained as follows:
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | |||
Product 1 only | |||
Product 2 only | |||
Both |
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 125 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $125 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 105 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $105 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 220 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 65 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $65 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 60 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $60 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 110 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 40 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
d.
Find the expected opportunity loss for each decision.
d.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information,
From the part c, the opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Then, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
e.
Find the
e.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected value of perfect information is –6.
Explanation of Solution
The expected value of perfect information is obtained by taking the difference between the expected value under conditions of certainty and expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
From the opportunity loss table in the part c, in the state of nature
Thus, these are taken as the decisions.
The expected value under conditions of certainty is calculated as follows:
State of Nature | Decision | Payoff | Probability | Expected payoff |
Both | 200 | 0.30 | ||
Both | 110 | 0.50 | ||
Both | 40 | 0.20 |
Then, the expected value under conditions of certainty is obtained by adding 60, 55 and 8. That is,
Thus, the expected value under conditions of certainty is $123.
From the part d, the decision both is recommended, because its expected opportunity loss is less when compared to other decisions. From the part a, it’s expected payoff value is $129. This is the expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
The expected value of perfect information is
Thus, the expected value of perfect information is –6.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
- Install RStudio: Begin by installing RStudio on your computer. If you haven't done so, please refer to the official RStudio website for download and installation instructions. Watch the Tutorial Video: Watch the provided video tutorial that explains how to run RStudio. Pay close attention to the steps for opening and managing data files. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhJp6vSZ7z0 Open RStudio: Once RStudio is installed, open the application. Load the Dataset: In RStudio, open a data file named "mtcars". To do this, type the command mtcars in the script editor and run the command. Attach the Data: Next, attach the dataset using the command attach(mtcars). Examine the Variables: Carefully review and note the names of all variables in the dataset. Examples of these variables include: Mileage (mpg) Number of Cylinders (cyl) Displacement (disp) Horsepower (hp) Research: Google to understand these variables. Statistical Analysis: Select mpg variable, and perform the following…arrow_forwardA marketing professor has surveyed the students at her university to better understand attitudes towards PPT usage for higher education. To be able to make inferences to the entire student body, the sample drawn needs to represent the university’s student population on all key characteristics. The table below shows the five key student demographic variables. The professor found the breakdown of the overall student body in the university’s fact book posted online. A non-parametric chi-square test was used to test the sample demographics against the population percentages shown in the table above. Review the output for the five chi-square tests on the following pages and answer the five questions: Based on the chi-square test, which sample variables adequately represent the university’s student population and which ones do not? Support your answer by providing the p-value of the chi-square test and explaining what it means. Using the results from Question 1, make recommendation for…arrow_forwardA marketing professor has surveyed the students at her university to better understand attitudes towards PPT usage for higher education. To be able to make inferences to the entire student body, the sample drawn needs to represent the university’s student population on all key characteristics. The table below shows the five key student demographic variables. The professor found the breakdown of the overall student body in the university’s fact book posted online. A non-parametric chi-square test was used to test the sample demographics against the population percentages shown in the table above. Review the output for the five chi-square tests on the following pages and answer the five questions: Based on the chi-square test, which sample variables adequately represent the university’s student population and which ones do not? Support your answer by providing the p-value of the chi-square test and explaining what it means. Using the results from Question 1, make recommendation for…arrow_forward
- A retail chain is interested in determining whether a digital video point-of-purchase (POP) display would stimulate higher sales for a brand advertised compared to the standard cardboard point-of-purchase display. To test this, a one-shot static group design experiment was conducted over a four-week period in 100 different stores. Fifty stores were randomly assigned to the control treatment (standard display) and the other 50 stores were randomly assigned to the experimental treatment (digital display). Compare the sales of the control group (standard POP) to the experimental group (digital POP). What were the average sales for the standard POP display (control group)? What were the sales for the digital display (experimental group)? What is the (mean) difference in sales between the experimental group and control group? List the null hypothesis being tested. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis based on the results of the independent t-test? Was the difference between the…arrow_forwardWhat were the average sales for the four weeks prior to the experiment? What were the sales during the four weeks when the stores used the digital display? What is the mean difference in sales between the experimental and regular POP time periods? State the null hypothesis being tested by the paired sample t-test. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis? At a 95% significance level, was the difference significant? Explain why or why not using the results from the paired sample t-test. Should the manager of the retail chain install new digital displays in each store? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardA retail chain is interested in determining whether a digital video point-of-purchase (POP) display would stimulate higher sales for a brand advertised compared to the standard cardboard point-of-purchase display. To test this, a one-shot static group design experiment was conducted over a four-week period in 100 different stores. Fifty stores were randomly assigned to the control treatment (standard display) and the other 50 stores were randomly assigned to the experimental treatment (digital display). Compare the sales of the control group (standard POP) to the experimental group (digital POP). What were the average sales for the standard POP display (control group)? What were the sales for the digital display (experimental group)? What is the (mean) difference in sales between the experimental group and control group? List the null hypothesis being tested. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis based on the results of the independent t-test? Was the difference between the…arrow_forward
- Question 4 An article in Quality Progress (May 2011, pp. 42-48) describes the use of factorial experiments to improve a silver powder production process. This product is used in conductive pastes to manufacture a wide variety of products ranging from silicon wafers to elastic membrane switches. Powder density (g/cm²) and surface area (cm/g) are the two critical characteristics of this product. The experiments involved three factors: reaction temperature, ammonium percentage, stirring rate. Each of these factors had two levels, and the design was replicated twice. The design is shown in Table 3. A222222222222233 Stir Rate (RPM) Ammonium (%) Table 3: Silver Powder Experiment from Exercise 13.23 Temperature (°C) Density Surface Area 100 8 14.68 0.40 100 8 15.18 0.43 30 100 8 15.12 0.42 30 100 17.48 0.41 150 7.54 0.69 150 8 6.66 0.67 30 150 8 12.46 0.52 30 150 8 12.62 0.36 100 40 10.95 0.58 100 40 17.68 0.43 30 100 40 12.65 0.57 30 100 40 15.96 0.54 150 40 8.03 0.68 150 40 8.84 0.75 30 150…arrow_forward- + ++ Table 2: Crack Experiment for Exercise 2 A B C D Treatment Combination (1) Replicate I II 7.037 6.376 14.707 15.219 |++++ 1 བྱ॰༤༠སྦྱོ སྦྱོཋཏྟཱུ a b ab 11.635 12.089 17.273 17.815 с ас 10.403 10.151 4.368 4.098 bc abc 9.360 9.253 13.440 12.923 d 8.561 8.951 ad 16.867 17.052 bd 13.876 13.658 abd 19.824 19.639 cd 11.846 12.337 acd 6.125 5.904 bcd 11.190 10.935 abcd 15.653 15.053 Question 3 Continuation of Exercise 2. One of the variables in the experiment described in Exercise 2, heat treatment method (C), is a categorical variable. Assume that the remaining factors are continuous. (a) Write two regression models for predicting crack length, one for each level of the heat treatment method variable. What differences, if any, do you notice in these two equations? (b) Generate appropriate response surface contour plots for the two regression models in part (a). (c) What set of conditions would you recommend for the factors A, B, and D if you use heat treatment method C = +? (d) Repeat…arrow_forwardQuestion 2 A nickel-titanium alloy is used to make components for jet turbine aircraft engines. Cracking is a potentially serious problem in the final part because it can lead to nonrecoverable failure. A test is run at the parts producer to determine the effect of four factors on cracks. The four factors are: pouring temperature (A), titanium content (B), heat treatment method (C), amount of grain refiner used (D). Two replicates of a 24 design are run, and the length of crack (in mm x10-2) induced in a sample coupon subjected to a standard test is measured. The data are shown in Table 2. 1 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Which factor effects appear to be large? (b) Conduct an analysis of variance. Do any of the factors affect cracking? Use a = 0.05. (c) Write down a regression model that can be used to predict crack length as a function of the significant main effects and interactions you have identified in part (b). (d) Analyze the residuals from this experiment. (e) Is there an…arrow_forward
- A 24-1 design has been used to investigate the effect of four factors on the resistivity of a silicon wafer. The data from this experiment are shown in Table 4. Table 4: Resistivity Experiment for Exercise 5 Run A B с D Resistivity 1 23 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I+I+I+I+Oooo 0 0 ||++TI++o000 33.2 4.6 31.2 9.6 40.6 162.4 39.4 158.6 63.4 62.6 58.7 0 0 60.9 3 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Plot the effect estimates on a normal probability scale. (b) Identify a tentative model for this process. Fit the model and test for curvature. (c) Plot the residuals from the model in part (b) versus the predicted resistivity. Is there any indication on this plot of model inadequacy? (d) Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals. Is there any reason to doubt the validity of the normality assumption?arrow_forwardStem1: 1,4 Stem 2: 2,4,8 Stem3: 2,4 Stem4: 0,1,6,8 Stem5: 0,1,2,3,9 Stem 6: 2,2 What’s the Min,Q1, Med,Q3,Max?arrow_forwardAre the t-statistics here greater than 1.96? What do you conclude? colgPA= 1.39+0.412 hsGPA (.33) (0.094) Find the P valuearrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337278461/9781337278461_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337282291/9781337282291_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337798310/9781337798310_smallCoverImage.jpg)