Equivalent voting systems . Two weighted voting systems are equivalent if they have the same number of players and exactly the same winning coalitions. a. Show that the weighted voting systems [ 8 : 5 , 3 , 2 ] and [ 2 : 1 , 1 , 0 ] are equivalent. b. Show that the weighted voting systems [ 7 : 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 ] and [ 5 : 3 , 2 , 1 , 1 ] are equivalent. c. Show that the weighted voting system discussed in Example 2.12 is equivalent to [ 3 : 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ] . d. Explain why equivalent weighted voting systems must have the same Banzhaf power distribution. e. Explain why equivalent weighted voting systems must have the same Shapley Shubik power distribution.
Equivalent voting systems . Two weighted voting systems are equivalent if they have the same number of players and exactly the same winning coalitions. a. Show that the weighted voting systems [ 8 : 5 , 3 , 2 ] and [ 2 : 1 , 1 , 0 ] are equivalent. b. Show that the weighted voting systems [ 7 : 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 ] and [ 5 : 3 , 2 , 1 , 1 ] are equivalent. c. Show that the weighted voting system discussed in Example 2.12 is equivalent to [ 3 : 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ] . d. Explain why equivalent weighted voting systems must have the same Banzhaf power distribution. e. Explain why equivalent weighted voting systems must have the same Shapley Shubik power distribution.
During busy political seasons, many opinion polls are conducted. In apresidential race, how do you think the participants in polls are generally selected?Discuss any issues regarding simple random, stratified, systematic, cluster, andconvenience sampling in these polls. What about other types of polls, besides political?
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Discrete Distributions: Binomial, Poisson and Hypergeometric | Statistics for Data Science; Author: Dr. Bharatendra Rai;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHhyy4JMigg;License: Standard Youtube License