Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
1st Edition
ISBN: 9780078747663
Author: McGraw-Hill
Publisher: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 21AA
To determine
To discuss: The reason why society thrived as capitalism and didn’t convert to communism.
Expert Solution & Answer
Explanation of Solution
Capitalism: It is system wherein the factors of production are owned by the individuals.
Communism: It is a system wherein the property is owned by the community and individuals are paid as per their ability and need.
The society thrived as capitalism and didn’t convert to communism. This may be because communism require authoritarian type of leadership while capitalism require laissez-faire type of government. Individuals prefer to be free, work as per their will and earn as per their ability. While unfair income should be eliminated and provision for necessity should be provided to the society but individuals don’t wish to distribute their part of income to others when they can choose to keep it completely. Individuals prefer to own properties, earn as much as possible and want less interference by the government. On the other hand, the basic necessity is provided under communalism but government holds the power to control personal freedom when following authoritarian type of government.
Thus, the society thrived as capitalism and didn’t convert to communism.
Chapter 2 Solutions
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 1RCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2RCh. 2.1 - Prob. 3RCh. 2.1 - Prob. 4RCh. 2.1 - Prob. 5RCh. 2.1 - Prob. 6RCh. 2.2 - Prob. 1RCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2RCh. 2.2 - Prob. 4RCh. 2.2 - Prob. 5R
Ch. 2.3 - Prob. 1RCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2RCh. 2.3 - Prob. 3RCh. 2.3 - Prob. 4RCh. 2.4 - Prob. 1RCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2RCh. 2.4 - Prob. 3RCh. 2 - Prob. 1AACh. 2 - Prob. 2AACh. 2 - Prob. 3AACh. 2 - Prob. 4AACh. 2 - Prob. 5AACh. 2 - Prob. 6AACh. 2 - Prob. 7AACh. 2 - Prob. 8AACh. 2 - Prob. 9AACh. 2 - Prob. 10AACh. 2 - Prob. 11AACh. 2 - Prob. 12AACh. 2 - Prob. 13AACh. 2 - Prob. 15AACh. 2 - Prob. 16AACh. 2 - Prob. 17AACh. 2 - Prob. 18AACh. 2 - Prob. 19AACh. 2 - Prob. 21AACh. 2 - Prob. 22AACh. 2 - Prob. 23AACh. 2 - Prob. 24AA
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Find more solutions based on key concepts
E2-13 Identifying increases and decreases in accounts and normal balances
Learning Objective 2
Insert the mis...
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
•• B.4. Consider the following linear programming problem:
Operations Management
An experimental composite engine block for an automobile will trim 20 pounds of weight compared with a traditio...
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
What are assets limited as to use and how do they differ from restricted assets?
Accounting For Governmental & Nonprofit Entities
Net Operating Loss, Carryforward, Tax Rate Change. Hamilton Container Company reported the following income (lo...
Intermediate Accounting (2nd Edition)
CHAPTER CASE
S&S Air’s Mortgage
Mark Sexton and Todd Story, the owners of S&S Air, Inc., were impressed by the ...
Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? Carrow_forwardIt is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forward
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education