To explain:The setup and working of a new economic system similar to that of the U.S.
Answer to Problem 1AA
Formation of an economic system like the U.S. and adopting its workings as in the form of a mixed economy where the decisions are taken holding the views of both the sectors is important so as to make the country work under a free-enterprise system with the existence of laissez-faire. Capitalism requires the economy to be free from government rules and regulations for every decision in the market as well as the economy. The market should work with the profit incentive motive creating competition so that the market can expand and grow at a large scale.
But along with considering the profit motive, economic equity has to be maintained performing the circular flow of income and output which actually has no particular beginning or end because of the unlimited needs of the people. Along with satisfying the people with their demands and facilities, keeping the welfare and profit motive in balance, the standard of living can be enhanced which would take
Explanation of Solution
In the process of formation of a new country or a new economic system, there are various things to be taken care of:
- Initially, the functioning of the economic system should be done with the motive of overall growth along with providing democracy in the system.
- There should be a mixed economy if a system like the U.S is needed, where both the sectors contribute to the maximum.
- As a mixed economy is a preference, there should be a free enterprise economy where the working is based on the market forces and not on any regulations.
- To reach the level of being a developed country like the U.S., being a profit incentive is the need to increase the standard of living of the people.
Introduction:
MAJOR TERMS EXPLAINED:
Economic system: It is a system that performs the activities of production, allocation and distribution of commodities and even the services within an area assigned or worked for.
Capitalism: It is a system in which the working and control are done by the market economy. In this, private individuals handle working and not any central rule, which is said to be a command economy.
Laissez-faire: It is a practice in the economic system where no government intervention takes place in the business and the economy is known as free-market capitalism.
Mixed economy: It is an economic system that performs with the regulations of both the private and the public sectors.
Free-enterprise economy: It is a system in which all the economic activities are governed and performed by the forces of demand and supply of the market.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in Intro to Business)
Fundamentals of Cost Accounting
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
Gitman: Principl Manageri Finance_15 (15th Edition) (What's New in Finance)
Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (10th Edition)
- It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardanswerarrow_forward
- Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forward
- presentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forward
- compare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education