Consider the matching problem. Example 5m, and define A N to be the number of ways in which the N men can select their hats so that no man selects his own. Argue that A N = ( N − 1 ) ( A N − 1 + A N − 2 ) This formula, along with the boundary conditions A 1 = 0, A 2 = 1, can then be solved for AN, and the desired probability of no matches would be A N N ! Hint: After the first man selects a hat that is not his own, there remain N - 1 men to select among a set of N - 1 hats that does not contain the hat of one of these men. Thus, there is one extra man and one extra hat. Argue that we can get no matches either with the extra man selecting the extra hat or with the extra man not selecting the extra hat.
Consider the matching problem. Example 5m, and define A N to be the number of ways in which the N men can select their hats so that no man selects his own. Argue that A N = ( N − 1 ) ( A N − 1 + A N − 2 ) This formula, along with the boundary conditions A 1 = 0, A 2 = 1, can then be solved for AN, and the desired probability of no matches would be A N N ! Hint: After the first man selects a hat that is not his own, there remain N - 1 men to select among a set of N - 1 hats that does not contain the hat of one of these men. Thus, there is one extra man and one extra hat. Argue that we can get no matches either with the extra man selecting the extra hat or with the extra man not selecting the extra hat.
Solution Summary: The author explains how the desired probability of the number of matches is A_N!.
Consider the matching problem. Example 5m, and define
A
N
to be the number of ways in which the N men can select their hats so that no man selects his own. Argue that
A
N
=
(
N
−
1
)
(
A
N
−
1
+
A
N
−
2
)
This formula, along with the boundary conditions A1 = 0, A2 = 1, can then be solved for AN, and the desired probability of no matches would be
A
N
N
!
Hint: After the first man selects a hat that is not his own, there remain N - 1 men to select among a set of N - 1 hats that does not contain the hat of one of these men. Thus, there is one extra man and one extra hat. Argue that we can get no matches either with the extra man selecting the extra hat or with the extra man not selecting the extra hat.
Answer questions 8.3.3 and 8.3.4 respectively
8.3.4 .WP An article in Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise [“Electrostimulation Training Effects on the Physical Performance of Ice Hockey Players” (2005, Vol. 37, pp.
455–460)] considered the use of electromyostimulation (EMS) as
a method to train healthy skeletal muscle. EMS sessions consisted of 30 contractions (4-second duration, 85 Hz) and were carried
out three times per week for 3 weeks on 17 ice hockey players.
The 10-meter skating performance test showed a standard deviation of 0.09 seconds. Construct a 95% confidence interval of the
standard deviation of the skating performance test.
8.6.7 Consider the tire-testing data in Exercise 8.2.3. Compute a 95% tolerance interval on the life of the tires that has confidence level 95%. Compare the length of the tolerance interval with the length of the 95% CI on the population mean. Which interval is shorter? Discuss the difference in interpretation of these two intervals.
8.6.2 Consider the natural frequency of beams described in
Exercise 8.2.8. Compute a 90% prediction interval on the
diameter of the natural frequency of the next beam of this type
that will be tested. Compare the length of the prediction interval
with the length of the 90% CI on the population mean.
8.6.3 Consider the television tube brightness test described in
Exercise 8.2.7. Compute a 99% prediction interval on the brightness of the next tube tested. Compare the length of the prediction
interval with the length of the 99% CI on the population mean.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.