Contemporary Labor Economics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781259290602
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, David Macpherson
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 1QS
To determine
Indifference curve and budget line in the work-leisure model.
Expert Solution & Answer
Explanation of Solution
An indifference curve in work-leisure model represents the combination of real income and leisure time that provide the same level of satisfaction to the worker.
In work-leisure model, budget line represents all possible combinations of real income and leisure that the worker obtained from the given wage rate.
The indifference curve is downward sloping, which means that it is negatively sloped because the workers are willing to give up leisure time in order to get more income and maintain equal satisfaction. If the time spent on leisure is reduced, income will increase. Thus, the indifference curve will be downward sloping.
Another major feature is that indifference curve is convex to the origin. The convexity implies that the marginal rate of substitution between income and leisure time decreases as a worker moves along the indifference curve, where the marginal rate of substitution indicates that one is given up for another. Thus, the indifference curve is convex to the origin.
The graphical representation of indifference curve and budget line is represented as follows:
In the figure, the horizontal axis represents hours of leisure and work and the vertical axis represents income. The downward sloping curve is the budget line of the worker. IC1, IC2, and IC3 are the indifference curves. The tangent point of budget constraints and indifference curve indicates the optimal choice. Thus, in the figure, U1 is the optimal point, where the worker will work for 8 hours per day and 16 hours spend for leisure in order to get $16 each day.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Using indifference curve analysis, show the effects of an increase in the hourly wage rate on labor
supply (hours of work) and earnings. Identify the income and substitution effects.
A worker , who satisfies our normal assumptions , is indifferent between consuming 4 units of leisure while earning 100 dollars and consuming 12 units of leisure while earning 40 dollars . If both bundles are feasible , is this worker maximizing utility ? Why or why not ?
On average, people sleep 8 hours per day
meaning that each individual has 16 hours
per day to allocate between labour and
leisure. Assuming that the wage rate is $15
per hour and there are non-labor income is
zero. The utility function of an individual is
given by U(Y, L) = YL and for simplicity, the
price index for real income is 1. a.
Determine the budget constraint. b.
Determine the marginal rate of substitution.
c. What are the optimal labor and leisure
hours? d. At the optimal relationship, what
is the utility level for the individual?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Contemporary Labor Economics
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider the standard labor-leisure choice model. Consumer gets utility from consumption (C) and leisure (L). She has H total hours. She works NS hours and receives the hourly wage, w. She has some non-labor income T and pays lump-sum tax T. Further suppose (n-T)>0. The shape of utility function is downward-sloping and bowed-in towards the origin (the standard U-shaped case just like a cobb-douglas function) If this consumer decides to NOT WORK AT ALL, then it must be the case that O A. MUL = MUC O B. MRSL,CI 2 w OC. IMRSL,CIs w O D. MRSL,C = w O E. None of abovearrow_forwardMarley has 100 hours per week available she can spend either working or doing leisure activities. He can work at a wage rate of $50 per hour. Bob receives $1000 of rental income per week, no matter how much he works. Use leisure-income model to solve this:- i) draw Marley budget line and optimal choice of working 80 hours in a week then calculate the maximum and optimal amount of income ii.) And suppose Marley is suppose to share the household expenses and then be taxed 50% of her wage income. then draw another diagram to compare Marley choice in Part i) and the new labour supply decision of working 90 hours per week due to the tax. Clearly label out the income effect, substitution effect and total effect in the diagram.arrow_forwardAssume Lorena derives utility from consumption and leisure. Through the following utility function. U=VC-R where C is consumption and R is hours of leisure consumed per day (there are 24 hours in her day). Let w be the wage rate and H be the hours of work chosen. The price of consumption goods, C, is $1. In addition, assume Lorena has $M amount of non- wage income each day. Set up the utility maximizing Lagrangian needed to maximize utility subject to the budget constraint but do not solve for the demand for C and R. a b. Draw the consumer choice model for this situation (fully label the graph). Use it to graphically derive/describe/explain her labor supply function and explain what would be true for her labor supply to rise or fall when the wage rises (you may want to draw the graph twice. Measure and explain the loss in consumer surplus using the concept of compensating variation. g. h. What is the expenditure-price elasticity equation for y? That is, the elasticity for the % change…arrow_forward
- Consider the following labor-leisure choice model. Utility function over consumption (C) and leisure (L) U(C.L) = (1/3L1/3 Total hours: H = 40 Labor hours: NS = H - L Non-labor income: π = 30 Lumpsum tax: T = 10 Hourly wage: w = 4 Suppose the hourly wage changes to w = 3. What is the substitution effect of this change on labor supply? A. +2.65 B. -2.65 C. +3.48 D.-3.48 E. None of the abovearrow_forwardWhat factors influence an individual's decision to allocate time between work and leisure in the context of the work-leisure model?arrow_forwarda. Solve the household’s optimisation problem with respect to ct, nt , et and explain the economic rationale of your results.arrow_forward
- Problem 4 Consider the leisure demand/labor supply model studied in class, and let the consumer have a spccific utility function U(N, Y) = N2/3y!/3. As in lecture, let the price of consumption be normalized to 1, and let w denote the wage. (a) Say that w = 10. What are the optimal N* and Y*? How many hours does the agent work? Draw a sketch to illustrate this situation. (b) Solve for the general demand functions N(w) and Y(w) as a function of the wage, as well as the labor supply function H(w). Calculate the elasticity of labor supply with respect to the wage, w. Do you notice anything special about this particular example? (c) Say the wage rises to some w' > w. What is the change in leisure demand N(w)? Carefully draw a sketch that decomposes this into an income effect and a substitution effect. (d) Sketch the labor supply function. (e) Let H(w) be the labor supply as a function of the (take-home) wage w. Say now that the government imposes an income tax of a. Let T(a) denote the…arrow_forwardConsider the following Labour-Leisure Choice model. Utility function over consumption (C) and leisure (L) 1 3 U(CL) = cL4 Total hours H = 20 Labour hours: N = H-L Non-labour income: 1 = 20 Lump-sum tax T= 10 Hourly wage w = 3 Suppose that the hourly wage increases to 5 What is the substitution effect of this wage change on labour supply(N)? A. -1.10 B. -2.10 O C. +1.10 OD. +2. 10 O E. None of the abovearrow_forwardA significant number of economists assume that that typical workers initially increase their labor supply when their wage increases but ultimately they decrease their labor supply when their wage gets higher. Show on two different graphs with indifference curves and budget line, showing labor income tradeoff, how a worker that increases its labor supply when wage increases from a worker that decreases his labor supply.Do you think the assumption above is a reasonable assumption? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
- A significant number of economists assume that that typical workers initially increase their labor supply when their wage increases but ultimately they decrease their labor supply when their wage gets higher. Show on two different graphs with indifference Curves and budget line, showing labor income tradeoff, how a worker that increases its labor supply when wage increases from a worker that decreases his labor supply. Do you think the assumption above is a reasonable assumption? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardThe following utility function represents Rose's preference over consumption and leisure u(c, l) = √c + 4√l. Rose receives a real wage of 15 and a non-wage income of 2. As a qualified recipient, Rose gets an additional non-wage income of 5 from the government through a cash transfer program. What is Rose's optimal choice of labor supply?arrow_forwardThe AB line in the below graph represents a worker's budget constraint (AB line). A utility- maximizing worker chooses the consumption- leisure bundle at point P, where the indifference curve is tangent to the budget line. Please analyze the impact of a new unemployment benefit program that consists in an amount "AG" if the worker is unemployed. This benefit is lost if the worker finds a job (even if he only works for one hour). B G A U1 Hours of Leisurearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co