ECON MACRO
ECON MACRO
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781337430401
Author: William A. McEachern
Publisher: Cengage Limited
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 2, Problem 1.1P
To determine

To explain: If the thought of finishing an expensive meal even if the appetite is full is right or not.

Concept Introduction:

Sunk costs are costs which cannot be recovered once it’s incurred. The business does not consider sunk costs when planning on the production or selling of the goods, because they cannot alter these costs to reduce total costs or increase revenue. Sunk costs are a part of every business organization. Thus, one can work effectively to reduce these sunk costs.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Since the cost of the expensive meal is already incurred, it cannot be recovered. Thus, it is a sunk cost. Since now the sunk cost is already incurred, it should not be considered in the decision making to maximize utility. Thus, if an individual cleans their plate despite being full, they are reducing their utility because they have already received the maximum utility from the dish when they are full. Irrespective of eating the entire dish or leaving it halfway, still means you have paid for the entire dish. Thus, one can rather choose to share the dish or pack the leftovers to eat at home, thus, keeping their utility intact.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
The table below shows pizza topping preferences for Marcus, Dakota, and Austin, and that each individual has strictly transitive preferences. Suppose that three individuals make up our "society." In this society, prefer pepperoni to cheese pizza; _prefer cheese to supreme; and prefer supreme to pepperoni. This example illustrates that _ Person Marcus Dakota Austin 0000 First Preference Pepperoni Supreme Cheese Second Preference Cheese Pepperoni Supreme Third Preference Supreme Cheese Pepperoni two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences must also. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property,…
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. In 2020, every professor was offered a full insurance contract with no premium. In 2021, HU charged any employee who wanted to keep health insurance the actuarially fair premium based on 2020 expenditures. This premium would be equal to and, as a result,professors dropped their coverage in 2021. _ 2020 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes Yes $25,000 $15,000 000000 $15,000; criminology $25,000; econ $20,000; econ $15,000; econ $20,000; criminology $25,000; criminology ??? $28,000 ??? $10,000
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. There is evidence of 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures 2020 Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes. Yes $25,000 $15,000 0000 ??? ??? $28,000 $10,000 I. moral hazard because in 2021 criminology professors dropped their coverage and health expenditures went down. II. adverse selection because in response to rising premiums after 2020, the professors with lower health expenditure dropped coverage Both I and II neither I nor II
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Economics
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:Cengage