Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781260152203
Author: William J Stevenson
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 19, Problem 2P

a)

Summary Introduction

To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.

Introduction:

Linear programming:

Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.

a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

Minimize Z=1.80S+2.20TSubject to:5S+8T200gr(Potassium)15S+6T240gr(Carbohydrate)4S+12T180gr(Protein)T10gr(T)S,T0(Nonnegativity)

Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:

Constraint 1:

5S+8T200gr(Potassium)

Substituting S=0 to find T,

5(0)+8T=2008T=200T=2008T=25

Substituting T=0 to find S,

5S+8(0)=2005S=200S=2005S=40

Constraint 2:

15S+6T240gr(Carbohydrate)

Substituting S=0 to find T,

15(0)+6T=2406T=240T=2406T=40

Substituting T=0 to find S,

15S+6(0)=24015S=240S=24015S=16

Constraint 3:

4S+12T180gr(Protein)

Substituting S=0 to find T,

4(0)+12T=18012T=180T=18012T=15

Substituting T=0 to find S,

4S+12(0)=1804S=180S=1804S=45

Constraint 4:

T10gr(T)

Therefore T=10.

Objective function:

The problem is solved with iso-cost line method.

Let 1.80S+2.20T=99

Substituting S=0 to find T,

1.80(0)+2.20T=992.20T=99T=992.20T=45

Substituting T=0 to find S,

1.80S+2.20(0)=991.80S=99S=991.80S=55

Graph:

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 19, Problem 2P , additional homework tip  1

(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:

The coordinates for the cost line is (45, 55). The cost line is moved towards the origin. The lowest at which the cost line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.

5S+8T=200 (1)

15S+6T=240 (2)

Solving (1) and (2) we get,

S=8,T=20

The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.

Minimize Z=1.80(8)+2.20(20)=14.40+44=58.40

Optimal solution:

S=8T=20Z=58.4

(2)

None of the constraints are having slack. All ≤ constraints are binding.

(3)

Protein and T constraint have surplus.

Protein:

4(8)+12(20)180gr32+240180272180

The surplus is 92 (272 – 180).

T:

T102010

The surplus is 10 (20– 10).

(4)

The protein constraint is redundant because, it does not intersect at any point in the feasible region.

b)

Summary Introduction

To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.

Introduction:

Linear programming:

Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.

b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

Minimize Z=2x1+3x2Subject to:4x1+2x220(D)2x1+6x218(E)x1+2x212(F)x1,x20(Nonnegativity)

Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:

Constraint 1:

4x1+2x220(D)

Substituting x1=0 to find x2,

4(0)+2x2=202x2=20x2=202x2=10

Substituting x2=0 to find x1,

4x1+2(0)=204x1=20x1=204x1=5

Constraint 2:

2x1+6x218(E)

Substituting x1=0 to find x2,

2(0)+6x2=186x2=18x2=186x2=3

Substituting x2=0 to find x1,

2x1+6(0)=182x1=18x1=182x1=9

Constraint 3:

x1+2x212(F)

Substituting x1=0 to find x2,

(0)+2x2=122x2=12x2=122x2=6

Substituting x2=0 to find x1,

x1+2(0)=12x1=12x1=121x1=12

Objective function:

The problem is solved with iso-cost line method.

Let 2x1+3x2=24

Substituting x1=0 to find x2,

2(0)+3x2=243x2=24x2=243x2=8

Substituting x2=0 to find x1,

2x1+3(0)=242x1=24x1=242x1=12

Graph:

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 19, Problem 2P , additional homework tip  2

(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:

The coordinates for the cost line is (12, 8). The cost line is moved towards the origin. The lowest at which the cost line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.

4x1+2x2=20 (1)

2x1+6x2=18 (2)

Solving (1) and (2) we get,

x1=4.2,x2=1.6

The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.

Minimize Z=2(4.2)+3(1.6)=8.4+4.8=13.2

Optimal solution:

x1=4.2x2=1.6Z=13.2

(2)

Constraint F is having slack as shown below.

(4.2)+2(1.6)124.2+3.2127.412

The slack is 4.6 (12 – 7.4).

(3)

There are no surplus. D and E constraints with ≥ are binding.

(4)

There are no redundant constraints

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Summarize chapters 1 through 8 of the book "food and beverage cost control"
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this thoroughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that the LA warehouse becomes temporarily or even indefinitely disabled since facing a large-scale labor disruption. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary The Constraint Scenario exhibits a higher total cost of $7,424,575.45 compared to the What-if Scenario's total cost of $6,611,905.60, signifying a difference of approximately $812,669.85, which indicates a more expensive operation in the Constraint Scenario. The average service time is slightly higher in the Constraint Scenario (0.72 days vs. 0.70 days), suggesting that the What-if Scenario provides a marginally quicker service. Moreover, the average end-to-end service time…
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this throughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that Dallas plant has lost power. It cannot serve the DCs anymore and has to remain locked indefinitely. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary In comparing the Constraint Scenario to the What-if Scenario, a few key differences highlight the efficiencies evident in the supply chain. Firstly, the total cost in the Constraint Scenario is lower at $7,424,575.45, while the What-if Scenario incurs a total cost of $7,486,369.12, resulting in a cost delta of $61,793.67. Additionally, although both scenarios exhibit the same average service time of 0.72 days, the What-if Scenario has a more favorable average end-to-end service time of 2.41…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,